View Full Version : Impeaching George Bush
tamiO
8th February 2003, 04:04 AM
Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General during the Johnson Administration has drafted articles of impeachment setting forth high crimes and misdemeanors by President Bush and other civil officers of his administration.
http://votetoimpeach.org/
Supercharts
8th February 2003, 06:42 AM
Ramsey Clark is an Assho*e.
Jedi Knight
8th February 2003, 06:48 AM
Originally posted by tamiO
http://votetoimpeach.org/
Clark is a communist. I don't take anything that guy says seriously.
JK
rikzilla
8th February 2003, 06:53 AM
Ahhh
The "movement" to impeach GWB has a website. Well then, it must be serious! :rolleyes: :p :D
gimme a break!
-z
shanek
8th February 2003, 07:03 AM
The impeachment process has already been made a joke by the Republicans who were so desperate to get Clinton out of office. This was inevitable.
rikzilla
8th February 2003, 07:33 AM
Originally posted by shanek
The impeachment process has already been made a joke by the Republicans who were so desperate to get Clinton out of office. This was inevitable.
Too true. Sometimes,...maybe even most times,...American in-fighting is America's biggest most powerful enemy.
-z
crackmonkey
8th February 2003, 07:41 AM
Why does anyone take anything Clark does seriously? The guy's out of his tiny little mind...
Advocate
8th February 2003, 08:35 AM
Personally, I will take impeachment seriously when/if it ever comes up for debate in the House, and not until then. Clark is a loon. Listen to him rant for 5 minutes and this becomes obvious.
RandFan
8th February 2003, 10:20 AM
Sorry, but to get impeached you have to get the poll polished by a fat intern.
Shanek is right though, what goes around comes around. Rember Bork, Lani Guiner was the pay back. And it will never end.
I wouldn't pay much attention to Clark. I hear he lost his aluminum foil hat recently. Maybe someone will find it but untill then it's best to just ignore the guy.
subgenius
8th February 2003, 11:11 AM
Originally posted by shanek
The impeachment process has already been made a joke by the Republicans who were so desperate to get Clinton out of office. This was inevitable.
Yes, another slippery slope.
I'm so old I remember a time when if your candidate lost, you accepted defeat graciously (because you at least believed you had been heard because your vote counted), united for the good of the country and supported the winner as best you could.
No one accepts a loss anymore: recalls, impeachment, etc. In many venues a person can get recalled by fewer votes than were cast in the election. WTF.
Aggravating this trend is the discounting of the power of the vote by campaign funding and the "election irregularities" ala Florida.
Impeachment of a president who got fewer popular votes is somewhat inevitable, and maybe more understandable.
As always I reserve the right to be completely wrong.
Teetop
8th February 2003, 11:35 AM
Originally posted by crackmonkey
Why does anyone take anything Clark does seriously? The guy's out of his tiny little mind...
Apparently there are alot of anti-war protestors who take him seriously---I''ll bet alot of the poor souls who are protesting are unaware that they are being duped by various Communist organizations.
Advocate
8th February 2003, 12:04 PM
Originally posted by subgenius
Yes, another slippery slope.
I'm so old I remember a time when if your candidate lost, you accepted defeat graciously (because you at least believed you had been heard because your vote counted), united for the good of the country and supported the winner as best you could.
No one accepts a loss anymore: recalls, impeachment, etc. In many venues a person can get recalled by fewer votes than were cast in the election. WTF.
Aggravating this trend is the discounting of the power of the vote by campaign funding and the "election irregularities" ala Florida.
Impeachment of a president who got fewer popular votes is somewhat inevitable, and maybe more understandable.
As always I reserve the right to be completely wrong.
IMHO both parties now see politics as basically a war. Their actions make sense only in this light. This has been going on at least since the 1980s and possibly longer. Thats just how far back I remember it. And both sides think the other currently has the upper hand in this war.
"The Left at its core understands in a way Grant understood after Shiloh that this is a civil war, that only one side will prevail, and that the other side will be relegated to history. This war has to be fought with the scale and duration and savagery that is only true of civil wars. While we are lucky in this country that our civil wars are fought at the ballot box, not on the battlefield, nonetheless it is a true civil war." - Newt Gingrich, 1988
"They have a destruction machine. We don't have a destruction machine." - Bill Clinton, 2002
It seems to me that we are fighting this civil war even now and both sides have unleashed their destruction machines. I wonder if we haven't become so polarized in this country that such a political war is necessary. At least it hasn't become a shooting war this time around.
corplinx
8th February 2003, 12:49 PM
If a republican controlled senate couldnt convict a simple case of perjury that was more clear-cut than the OJ's guilt, they will never convict one of their own on a bunch of farcical charges.
shanek
8th February 2003, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by Teetop
I''ll bet alot of the poor souls who are protesting are unaware that they are being duped by various Communist organizations.
The Libertarian Party is encouraging anti-war protests. Are you really saying that Libertarians are Communist? :rolleyes:
subgenius
8th February 2003, 04:13 PM
Originally posted by shanek
The Libertarian Party is encouraging anti-war protests. Are you really saying that Libertarians are Communist? :rolleyes:
Anyone who feels threatened by communists these days needs to get out more often.
Supercharts
8th February 2003, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by subgenius
Anyone who feels threatened by communists these days needs to get out more often.
In Columbia some people did get out and went to a nightclub. It was blown up by a car bomb by Marxists.
Iwentsouth
8th February 2003, 04:51 PM
Massacres all the time in Nepal because Marxists too.
AWNSER is a front for the World Workers Party.
RandFan
8th February 2003, 09:03 PM
Originally posted by subgenius
Anyone who feels threatened by communists these days needs to get out more often.
Originally posted by Supercharts
In Columbia some people did get out and went to a nightclub. It was blown up by a car bomb by Marxists. Come on sub, say it, "touché". That was damn funny!
crackmonkey
8th February 2003, 09:38 PM
*applause*
subgenius
8th February 2003, 10:41 PM
I was mugged by a crackhead does that make them a global threat or something to live your life in fear over?
subgenius
8th February 2003, 10:42 PM
Do you need an enemy to fear to define your life?
subgenius
8th February 2003, 10:44 PM
Watch "Defending Your Life", conquer your fears.
Live for something, not against something.
Skeptic
9th February 2003, 06:30 AM
http://votetoimpeach.org/
(shrug)
In texas last week, a woman sued both George W. Bush and his wife, claiming that both repeatedly had sex with her when he was governor, and influenced her thoughts by aiming mind-controlled lazer beams at her head.
Both of these legal actions have about the same chance of removing Bush from office, IMHO.
subgenius
9th February 2003, 07:33 AM
Originally posted by Skeptic
http://votetoimpeach.org/
(shrug)
In texas last week, a woman sued both George W. Bush and his wife, claiming that both repeatedly had sex with her when he was governor, and influenced her thoughts by aiming mind-controlled lazer beams at her head.
Both of these legal actions have about the same chance of removing Bush from office, IMHO.
Oh I don't know. OJ might find the real killers yet.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.