Severian
4th January 2007, 03:33 PM
This is a useful site - publiceye.org - which deals with conspiracy theories among other political topics. It points out some of the common features of numerous conspiracy theories. And the faulty assumptions behind the worldview that claims that vast, improbably perfect conspiracies make the world go around.
Summary: Conspiracism is a narrative form of scapegoating that portrays an enemy as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good. Conspiracism assigns tiny cabals of evildoers a superhuman power to control events, frames social conflict as part of a transcendent struggle between Good and Evil, and makes leaps of logic, such as guilt by association, in analyzing evidence. Conspiracists often employ common fallacies of logic in analyzing factual evidence to assert connections, causality, and intent that are frequently unlikely or nonexistent. As a distinct narrative form of scapegoating, conspiracism uses demonization to justify constructing the scapegoats as wholly evil while reconstructing the scapegoater as a hero.
Conspiracism portal page (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/index.html) with links to the various pages and articles on the subject
Some highlights:
Dynamics of Conspiracist Scapegoating (http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/conspiracism.html)
Conspiracism as a Flawed Worldview (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/conspiracism.html)
The Political Assumptions of Conspiracism (http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/conspiracism-07.html#P99_30362)
Post 9/11 Conspiracism (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/conspiracism-911.html)
I'd be happy to discuss any of that material with anyone who has comments on or questions about it.
Summary: Conspiracism is a narrative form of scapegoating that portrays an enemy as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good. Conspiracism assigns tiny cabals of evildoers a superhuman power to control events, frames social conflict as part of a transcendent struggle between Good and Evil, and makes leaps of logic, such as guilt by association, in analyzing evidence. Conspiracists often employ common fallacies of logic in analyzing factual evidence to assert connections, causality, and intent that are frequently unlikely or nonexistent. As a distinct narrative form of scapegoating, conspiracism uses demonization to justify constructing the scapegoats as wholly evil while reconstructing the scapegoater as a hero.
Conspiracism portal page (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/index.html) with links to the various pages and articles on the subject
Some highlights:
Dynamics of Conspiracist Scapegoating (http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/conspiracism.html)
Conspiracism as a Flawed Worldview (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/conspiracism.html)
The Political Assumptions of Conspiracism (http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/conspiracism-07.html#P99_30362)
Post 9/11 Conspiracism (http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/conspiracism-911.html)
I'd be happy to discuss any of that material with anyone who has comments on or questions about it.