reprise
1st July 2003, 07:23 PM
So 54 asylum-seekers are now going to be detained on Christmas Island indefinitely because Coastwatch somehow failed to detect them before they entered our exclusion zone, let alone before they entered Australian waters.
More asylum seekers arrive (http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,6687151%255E421,00.html)
Boat arrival an isolated incident : Ruddock (http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/02/1056825430694.html)
Television news bulletins report that the government has stated that it knew the boat was heading towards our shores - why the hell was the order not given to intercept it before it entered Australian waters? As least if the boat had been turned back before it entered Australian waters it could have been given safe passage to Christmas Island or one of the other Pacific Islands - or even all the way back to Indonesia, if necessary - thus ensuring that its occupants didn't become virtual prisoners of the Australian government for an indefinite period of time. On humanitarian grounds alone, this vessel should never have been allowed to enter our waters.
More asylum seekers arrive (http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,6687151%255E421,00.html)
Boat arrival an isolated incident : Ruddock (http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/02/1056825430694.html)
Television news bulletins report that the government has stated that it knew the boat was heading towards our shores - why the hell was the order not given to intercept it before it entered Australian waters? As least if the boat had been turned back before it entered Australian waters it could have been given safe passage to Christmas Island or one of the other Pacific Islands - or even all the way back to Indonesia, if necessary - thus ensuring that its occupants didn't become virtual prisoners of the Australian government for an indefinite period of time. On humanitarian grounds alone, this vessel should never have been allowed to enter our waters.