Skunkrider: WTC7: Freefall

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed

Skunkrider,

Please provide a clear definition by what you mean by the phrase, "collapsed partly in free fall speed" and provide substantiating evidence to support your definition and conclusions.

[HeyLeroy]

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/619745a54bbe44f13.gif

[Loss Leader]

"free fall speed"

Free fall isn't a speed. It's a rate of acceleration.

That's why I never understood why the Enterprise went anywhere at 1/4 impulse speed. If you turn on your engines in space, you don't go a "speed," you accelerate at a fixed rate.

[HeyLeroy]

Everyone knows the Enterprise was remotely piloted.

[Pardalis]

Oh please, we've been through this a thousand times already!

:faint:

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Well, skunkrider either does not agree with the previous discussions or feels that (s)he has information that renders them null. I'm giving him/her a chance to defend the statement made in another thread. :D

[MG1962]

Everyone knows the Enterprise was remotely piloted

And judging from the hole, it was a disguised space shuttle anyway

[DarkMagician]

Okay, this is why I hate myself.
Okay, one thing that people keep on forgetting is that the debris pile cuts down on time, since the top of the building now mostly ends up at the top of the pile. Also, I use 12 stories and 6 stories as the size of the debris pile. I believe LC uses 6 stories, but better sources have 12 as a minimum. Neither one is short enough to promote the freefall myth.

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/thum_177245b97601f40e3.gif (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3814)