9/11 Mysteries - "Sophia cut my work up into disinfo segments"

[The Doc]

Creator of the film "9/11 Eyewitness", Rick Siegel, is not happy at all with the segments of his film that were used in 9/11 Mysteries. Why? Because Sofia butchered them. Much like the Phillip Moreli interview. Not that I agree with anything in 9/11 Eyewitness at all though lol.

Wow, check this out! After stealing my footage and editing it into a piece of misinformation Sophia has decided to hire a lawyer rather than pay for the rights she took without even a free DVD.

After seeing what a piece of disinfo this was I asked her how the hell she got that in there and she claims that the office boy in the US gave her the rights. An office boy! Jim the guy who does the shipping in the USA is who gave her the copyrights to my work? Come on Sophia you can do better than that. You have NOTHING in writing or you would have showed me already.


This will be interesting to follow.

[uk_dave]

wow the woowoos are really turning on each other today!!

:D:D:D:D

[~enigma~]

Creator of the film "9/11 Eyewitness", Rick Siegel, is not happy at all with the segments of his film that were used in 9/11 Mysteries. Why? Because Sofia butchered them. Much like the Phillip Moreli interview. Not that I agree with anything in 9/11 Eyewitness at all though lol.



This will be interesting to follow.This is rich...entertainment is brewing on the horizon :D

[The Doc]

Lol that's what I was thinking.

On the note of alteration, would cutting up Phillip Morelli's interview the way they did constitute fair use and copyright infringement? I'm not a lawyer by any means but I was under the impression that removing certain sections of footage to change the context is a pretty serious offense?

You can see what they did to Phillip Morelli's interview here (coded to play at the exact spot).

http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-6243624912447824934#51m09s (http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-6243624912447824934#51m09s)

[MG1962]

On the note of alteration, would cutting up Phillip Morelli's interview the way they did constitute fair use and copyright infringement? I'm not a lawyer by any means but I was under the impression that removing certain sections of footage to change the context is a pretty serious offense?



You would be a 100 percent right. The whole fair usage arguement is based around media sources sharing resourses. Part of that sharing is not to alter the context. I am not sure how that would work with CT doco's. Or doco's in general. But news items are usually limited to 30 or 60 second slabs.

[orphia nay]

wow the woowoos are really turning on each other today!!

:D:D:D:D

Splitters! Splitters! Again!

Where's Oliver with the :pythonfoot: video of John Cleese as the woman with the Brontosaurus theory?

[Brainster]

I note that he specifically complains about her ridiculous mistake of showing the times Siegel claims that there were explosions from the South Tower, while showing the North Tower's collapse. Talk about amateur hour! BTW, here's the link to Rick's post (http://www.ricksiegel.com/web/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=147).

[T.A.M.]

I'd say "dog eat dog", but given they are all doing this on the backs of the victims and their families, it is more like "Hyena eat Hyena" or "Vulture eat Vulture".

TAM

[StoneWT]

Good times. Let the fools devour themselves.

[CHF]

The best twoofer civil war so far has been the laser beamers vs the demolition people.

A logical battle straight out of kindergarden.

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Splitters! Splitters! Again!

Where's Oliver with the :pythonfoot: video of John Cleese as the woman with the Brontosaurus theory?

Well. You know. Stonehendge, if you bend down just right, does sort of look like a dinosaur. Tried it the most recent time I was there. Of course I had been to the Swan Inn in Enford for lunch just before and had had a couple of pints if apple juice (or was it cider?) It's all a question of perspective. ;)