A hilariously stupid video analysis of flight 175

[chippy]

Check out this video:

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4631948562959650929

It shows two camera views that are supposedly from the same spot and yet show different flight paths.

Um, except that they aren't in the same spot. A screen shot from the end of the video:

http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m80/911debunker/dumbasses.jpg

I don't even need to make specific measurements to show you that the widths of the towers are completely different, meaning that these two shots are clearly from quite different angles. Thus the flight paths don't line up exactly.

How do people get away with posting this crap?

[CHF]

How do people get away with posting this crap?

I believe its called desperation.

Remember that the twoof movement is mostly made up of social outcasts - Nazis, bigfoot/chem trail/moon landing hoax researchers, and basically loons of all stripes.

They see 911 twoof as their big chance to get attention and become admired among their peers.

The one with the latest big "discovery" gets the spot light and every kook wants to be that person.

This is the result.

[Unfit4Command]

The music from that video nearly drove me insane. I saw something like this a while ago, I didn't bother doing much research into since it's not hard to tell that the two shots are from different camera angles.

[Brainster]

That's Nico Haupt's work; he's the guy that even the Deniers think is crazy. He's probably my favorite single character in 9-11 Denial; he's like something out of Dickens. He got a lot of attention in the second Matt Taibbi piece in Rolling Stone. There's also an interview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBoA1FNzYyk) with him in a bar out there that has some entertainment value (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2HkO-QwQDk).

[beachnut]

That's Nico Haupt's work; he's the guy that even the Deniers think is crazy. He's probably my favorite single character in 9-11 Denial; he's like something out of Dickens. He got a lot of attention in the second Matt Taibbi piece in Rolling Stone. There's also an interview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBoA1FNzYyk) with him in a bar out there that has some entertainment value (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2HkO-QwQDk).

Nico Haupt is insane. He gets his information from the internet. The planes that eyes saw did not hit. 175 did not hit the WTC? Nico is insane.

Wow - what a real nut case.

[beachnut]

Check out this video:

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4631948562959650929

It shows two camera views that are supposedly from the same spot and yet show different flight paths.

Um, except that they aren't in the same spot. A screen shot from the end of the video:

I don't even need to make specific measurements to show you that the widths of the towers are completely different, meaning that these two shots are clearly from quite different angles. Thus the flight paths don't line up exactly.

How do people get away with posting this crap?

You are right. This is a great example of liars trying to make up stuff. If they think they are right; they are the dumbest CTers around.

There are many reasons this video is so wrong. At least if you meet this person you know they are dumb. They have left no doubt about their stupidity or fraud.

[LashL]

Unbelievable. Astounding, really, that someone can produce something so blatantly wrong, so blatantly dishonest, and even believe it himself, let alone believe that others would find it convincing. The only thing is convinces me of is that the guy who put the video together is a complete lunatic.

[eddyk]

From the guy that made that...there is also this amazing bit of evidence...

http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/7521/cnnforemanphotocontradictionww6.jpg

What idiots we have all been...

[beachnut]

http://video.google.de/videoplay?doc...48562959650929 (http://video.google.de/videoplay?doc...48562959650929)

These guys live in a 2D world. They have left out 3D and time.

Maybe their brains are just 2D too.