Lone Lantern Society of the US - Evidence of CD

[T.A.M.]

Anyone hear of these guys. According to the article below, they claim to have evidence that the USG brought the towers down via demolition, using 880 detonators.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/28/stories/2007012801030700.htm

For your "indigestion".

TAM

[~enigma~]

Anyone hear of these guys. According to the article below, they claim to have evidence that the USG brought the towers down via demolition, using 880 detonators.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/28/stories/2007012801030700.htm

For your "indigestion".

TAMDid I miss the evidence??????????????????????

[The Demon's Head]

I totally believe it now.

[babazaroni]

Lone Lantern Society of US has a 9/11 section here (http://lonelantern.org/site/index.php?option=com_magazine&func=show_magazine&id=2&Itemid=33).

Look under the evidence section.

[T.A.M.]

So their evidence is the same old boring "squib" thing again...geeeesh.

So why do they use the number 880...you would think they'd have some method behind such an odd number.

TAM

[babazaroni]

Yes, everywhere they see a puff, either as the aircraft hits, or during the collapse, they claim explosives were responsible.

[Oliver]

That´s it. Show is over. Forum closed.
The last one turns off the light, please.

[babazaroni]

They even point to broken windows on WTC 7 that broke after the building has started collapsing as evidence.

[ConspiRaider]

The math proves it.

2 Towers times 110 floors equals 220 floors.

220 floors times 4 corners = 880 corners.

880 corners divided by 880 detonators equals 1 detonator for each corner.

Wait a minute. Don't detonators have to detonate something? Like - oh maybe - explosives?!? Fine, the detonator goes off but what the hell good is that? It's like plunging a toilet that has no water in it!!!

Maybe we should look a little more into this, now I'm not so sure the Solitary Compact-Fluorescent-Bulb Society did all their homework...

[~enigma~]

Lone Lantern Society of US has a 9/11 section here (http://lonelantern.org/site/index.php?option=com_magazine&func=show_magazine&id=2&Itemid=33).

Look under the evidence section.Thanks..after looking at that, I need to turn my stereo to an ungodly volume and listen to Slayer through my headphones. That should raise my IQ back to normal :)

[Childlike Empress]

So why do they use the number 880

8 is the number of the sun worshippers. Two eights, three digits - that's 23, dude! Illuminati code. Damned shills. :shocked:

Td_fN_u6jDM

[LashL]

No way, no how, am I clicking on a link from a guy who calls himself "childlike empress" and uses an actress' photo as his avatar, without knowing where that link is going... sorry. :rolleyes:

[Childlike Empress]

Well, you are brutally limiting your experiences - but that's your choice.

[CurtC]

On their "evidence (http://lonelantern.org/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=33)" page, the top left photo supposedly shows the supposed demo charges (which they call "squibs") on one of the towers. Did anyone else notice that the animated graphic has been modified to make it look more explosive? In the videos of this, the dust/smoke appears to be squeezed out gradually, instead of the sudden blasting you'd expect with demo charges. But in that animation, they cut out the frames between when it first starts and when it's fully formed, making it look like it got to that shape all sudden-like. I wonder if this was intentional? ;)

Down the page, there's another animation labelled "MSNBC's north view" which shows some frames of the South Tower being struck, from the side of the tower opposite where the plane hit. You can see the windows at the sky lobby of floor 78 just below where the main impact was, but in the last frame, it looks like the windows of the 78th floor are bursting outwards. This is the same floor where Orio Palmer reached and reported numerous bodies, but two isolated pockets of fire, which we hear so much about from the Troothers. If that view shows what I think it does, I can understand the numerous deaths on that floor.

[beachnut]

:shocked: Stop using WTC as a squib demo! Air does not qualify!

u2KsASkHDBM

real squibs! ?

[gumboot]

8 is the number of the sun worshippers. Two eights, three digits - that's 23, dude! Illuminati code. Damned shills. :shocked:

Td_fN_u6jDM


The sun worshippers? Which ones?

-Gumboot

[gumboot]

If that view shows what I think it does, I can understand the numerous deaths on that floor.


According to survivors from that floor between 50 and 200 people were killed instantly when the wing tip of UA175 slammed through the building.

-Gumboot

[Childlike Empress]

The sun worshippers? Which ones?

-Gumboot

Just for the record and to prevent certain smartasses quoting me and forcing me to explain it in the future: i was joking. I tried to make fun of TAMs remark and numerology at the same time.

"8 is the the number of the sun worshippers" is a quote from the AFAIK most paranoid radiohost on the planet, Gary Bell AKA "Spaceman" of Toronto, to whose shows i occasionally listen for amusement and did so last night. I was a little bit deranged because he just revealed that Angela Merkel, my beloved chancellor, is in fact the daughter of Adolf Hitler, produced in an act of artificial insemination by a mad nazi scientist involving Hitler's semen and Eva Braun's sister. Sorry for that. :p

[Cl1mh4224rd]

On their "evidence (http://lonelantern.org/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=33)" page, the top left photo supposedly shows the supposed demo charges (which they call "squibs") on one of the towers. Did anyone else notice that the animated graphic has been modified to make it look more explosive?
Yep. They cut some frames out.

[LashL]

Well, you are brutally limiting your experiences - but that's your choice.

I seriously doubt that choosing not to click on unspecified links posted by a guy who calls himself "childlike empress" and who uses an actress' photo as his avatar, is "brutally limiting my experiences" but thanks for your concern.

:rolleyes:

[Childlike Empress]

I seriously doubt that choosing not to click on unspecified links posted by a guy who calls himself "childlike empress" and who uses an actress' photo as his avatar, is "brutally limiting my experiences" but thanks for your concern.

:rolleyes:

Are you playing a little revenge on me for adressing you as "dude" months ago, or what? The actress is the wonderful Anna Karina and that never was a secret - did i say it was me? Are you Stonehenge?