View Full Version : Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal of Microchopped Population
Iggy
1st February 2007, 07:36 AM
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal .htm (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm)
Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller's creation of women's lib, and the elite's ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, January 29, 2007
Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who personally told him that the elite's ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.
Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.
Russo is perhaps best known for producing Trading Places starring Eddie Murphy but was more recently in the spotlight for his exposé of the criminal run for profit federal reserve system, the documentary America From Freedom to Fascism.
Arkan_Wolfshade
1st February 2007, 07:55 AM
Does Russo have any actual evidence to back up his claim?
SwissSkeptic
1st February 2007, 08:03 AM
So we're all going to be microchopped? :eye-poppi Sounds scary!
Lisa Simpson
1st February 2007, 08:04 AM
So we're all going to be microchopped? :eye-poppi Sounds scary!
Pulverized to dust less than 100 microns!!
Anti-sophist
1st February 2007, 08:05 AM
Uh oh, looks like we got one of the hit-n-run woo-vertisement posters here. Ridiculous headline. Post a blurb. Provide a link. Sometimes throw in an image or two... and post it on every forum in sight.
HeyLeroy
1st February 2007, 08:10 AM
[:tinfoil ]Don't you sheeple GET IT?!? Part of Trading Places was filmed at the WTC!!! :eek: :hypnotize :eye-poppi :jaw-dropp [/:tinfoil ]
SwissSkeptic
1st February 2007, 08:10 AM
Pulverized to dust less than 100 microns!!
I should have known, you just can't trust the elite and their plans of "population reduction" these days.
CurtC
1st February 2007, 08:19 AM
... and Glora Steinem was a CIA agent.
Your ideas intrigue me, and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.
jhunter1163
1st February 2007, 08:26 AM
There's a setting for "microchop" on my Cuisinart, right next to "frappe". I must have gotten one of the NWO models.
JAStewart
1st February 2007, 08:37 AM
I wouldn't mind having a trackable microchip in me, like if I was kidnapped or something. Would help to find me.
Iggy
1st February 2007, 08:38 AM
I wouldn't mind having a trackable microchip in me, like if I was kidnapped or something. Would help to find me.
Your wish is their command.
ponderingturtle
1st February 2007, 08:42 AM
Pulverized to dust less than 100 microns!!
WIth normal human bodies that would be a thin goo, not a dust.
Anti-sophist
1st February 2007, 08:43 AM
As I said on the other forum when one of these drive-by piles of nonsense was posted... I'm glad Russo has moved away from lying about Income Taxes and is back into something a little more crazy. Unlike his Income-Tax lies, people who buy into this nonsense aren't stamping their 1-way ticket to jail.
uk_dave
1st February 2007, 08:44 AM
We found that there was no point in implanting microchips in people, because all of the 'fearless warriors for truth' we want to keep an eye on use computers, email, search engines, forums, messenger, operating systems, media players etc etc, and we already control ALL of those!
Muhahahahahahahahahaha!
DarkMagician
1st February 2007, 08:44 AM
Ahh prisonplanet.com. When you hate the government, who needs evidence and logic?
JonnyFive
1st February 2007, 08:45 AM
Oh, would you look at that, the only source on this seems to be prison planet.
Iggy, could you please provide additional confirmation? How about the actual interview with Nick Rockefeller, perhaps? How about some evidence?
Kiwiwriter
1st February 2007, 08:53 AM
I should have known, you just can't trust the elite and their plans of "population reduction" these days.
If the goal of the NWO is to reduce the world's population, they're doing a lousy job of it. The population of third-world countries with neither medicine nor food nor schools is exploding, which does not provide the New World Order with obedient and educated (read: socially engineered) drones to run their microchip factories and monitor the chips and prepare reports on their readouts and information. It seems to me it would be a lot easier for the NWO if they whacked the population of the third world and tripled it in the first and second.
And if they really are trying to exterminate the people, they'll have to use the methods of the Holocaust instead of just relying on AIDS or drugs to do it...oh, wait a second...they can't use the methods of the Holocaust. It never happened, remember? :boggled:
Firestone
1st February 2007, 08:58 AM
Ok, so everyone is making fun of this Russo, and rightly so.
But I do have questions.
Is Russo simply making the statements of Nick Rockefeller up? :confused:
Is Russo taking real statements totally out of context?
And can he just do it? Is this covered by free speech, or can Nick Rockefeller sue him for this? (Theoretically speaking, I guess that Rockefeller will not sue a nobody like Russo.)
Overman
1st February 2007, 08:58 AM
Didn't I see this on the Food network, but it wasn't population, it was chicken...DAMN YOU MR. POPIEL!!!!
CurtC
1st February 2007, 09:04 AM
Oh, would you look at that, the only source on this seems to be prison planet.Their source is an interview with Aaron Russo, who describes a conversation he supposedly had with this Nick Rockefeller guy. It makes me wonder if Rockefeller might have actually said that stuff, knowing he was talking to a kook. Sounds like fun: "You know that whole women's lib thing? That was us. We put the RFID tracking strips in currency. Also, Sony, Nintendo, and Sega are all wholly owned by us, and their purpose is to turn kids' minds to goo so that they won't be able to object to our plans. Bwaahaahaa!"
pchams
1st February 2007, 09:20 AM
Their source is an interview with Aaron Russo, who describes a conversation he supposedly had with this Nick Rockefeller guy. It makes me wonder if Rockefeller might have actually said that stuff, knowing he was talking to a kook. Sounds like fun: "You know that whole women's lib thing? That was us. We put the RFID tracking strips in currency. Also, Sony, Nintendo, and Sega are all wholly owned by us, and their purpose is to turn kids' minds to goo so that they won't be able to object to our plans. Bwaahaahaa!"
Don't forget chemtrails.
You can't have govt. poulation controls without chemtrails... :boxedin:
JonnyFive
1st February 2007, 09:22 AM
Their source is an interview with Aaron Russo, who describes a conversation he supposedly had with this Nick Rockefeller guy. It makes me wonder if Rockefeller might have actually said that stuff, knowing he was talking to a kook. Sounds like fun: "You know that whole women's lib thing? That was us. We put the RFID tracking strips in currency. Also, Sony, Nintendo, and Sega are all wholly owned by us, and their purpose is to turn kids' minds to goo so that they won't be able to object to our plans. Bwaahaahaa!"
Yes, that is technically correct. Prison Planet's only source is the Aaron Russo interview. Mind you, not his supposed interview with Nick Rockefeller. A minor detail, I'm sure. ;)
jon
1st February 2007, 09:46 AM
Ahh prisonplanet.com. When you hate the government, evidence and logic?
Quote modified for increased accuracy :D
Gravy
1st February 2007, 09:46 AM
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal of Microchopped PopulationDon't mince your words.
stateofgrace
1st February 2007, 09:50 AM
And what,exactly,is wrong with microchip implants?
http://www.animationalley.com/images/prints/mpa/mpa_trek9.jpg
TellyKNeasuss
1st February 2007, 10:16 AM
Sounds like a grate idea.
R.Mackey
1st February 2007, 10:18 AM
Bah.
Typical CTish rubbish. We don't need to "microchip" (or even "microchop") anyone. We can track you just fine right now. Those tinfoil helmets you've all got make splendid radar reflectors.
Sleep tight, nutball.
All kidding aside, it gets harder and harder every day not to use the "Ignore" feature.
Kiwiwriter
1st February 2007, 11:05 AM
Their source is an interview with Aaron Russo, who describes a conversation he supposedly had with this Nick Rockefeller guy. It makes me wonder if Rockefeller might have actually said that stuff, knowing he was talking to a kook. Sounds like fun: "You know that whole women's lib thing? That was us. We put the RFID tracking strips in currency. Also, Sony, Nintendo, and Sega are all wholly owned by us, and their purpose is to turn kids' minds to goo so that they won't be able to object to our plans. Bwaahaahaa!"
Bear in mind that CTers lack a real sense of humor, except for laughter of derision or triumph over enemies. They cannot separate hyperbole and hilarity from hysteria and hatred. Being laughed at by their audience infuriates them. Remember their inflated sense of self-importance. Each CT leader thinks that he is the sole bearer of truth to the planet, and he is standing in the gap in the final battle between Good and Evil, flaying away at a multi-headed dragon on behalf of all mankind. It's horrible for him when the multi-headed dragon turns into a Chihuahua and mankind is just laughing at him instead of cheering him on.
TellyKNeasuss
1st February 2007, 11:27 AM
Those NWO folks are such a bunch of cut-ups!
Alt+F4
1st February 2007, 03:16 PM
Who is Nick Rockefeller? Where is the evidence that he's a member of the well known American industrialist/philanthropic family?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_family#Descendants_of_John_Davison_Roc kefeller
hellaeon
1st February 2007, 03:30 PM
* chuckle * prisonplanet! good source. Any actual evidence we could use?
PerryLogan
1st February 2007, 03:46 PM
The word "admitted" gives the article away as an Alex Jones production. If you listen to Alex rap, you'll notice he is always saying "It's admitted!" and things like that. Apparently, the bad guys are going around admitting everything, but only Alex Jones can hear it.
Alex goes to the secret websites where the New World Order tells you everything it's going to do. That's how he predicts the future, chirp-chirp.
Alex has long been predicting a big media blitz for microchips. But it hasn't materialized yet.
Architect
1st February 2007, 03:50 PM
I wouldn't mind having a trackable microchip in me, like if I was kidnapped or something. Would help to find me.
Because, like, kidnapping is such a problem on Shetland and there are so many places to hid folk?!?! :confused:
beachnut
1st February 2007, 03:52 PM
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal .htm (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm)
Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller's creation of women's lib, and the elite's ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society
Only really dumb guys believe anything from prisonplanet. Which part of this statement resembles you?
PJ Watson is the most unreliable source in the world. I do not understand how prisonplanet gets every story wrong. News is bad enough but prisonplanet has a way of not getting anything right. It must be a dumb guy site.
When you post and cite the prisonplanet site you are debunked out of the gate. Before anyone reads it they can just tell you it is junk.
Even if a miracle happen and prisonplanet did have a true story no one will ever believe it since they have cried wolf too many times.
Wolf, wolf... prisonplanet is warning the world they are dumb and here they get dumber. Only thing dumber than prisonplanet are those who spread the stories.
Who could be that dumb?
fuelair
1st February 2007, 05:33 PM
The word "admitted" gives the article away as an Alex Jones production. If you listen to Alex rap, you'll notice he is always saying "It's admitted!" and things like that. Apparently, the bad guys are going around admitting everything, but only Alex Jones can hear it.
Alex goes to the secret websites where the New World Order tells you everything it's going to do. That's how he predicts the future, chirp-chirp.
Alex has long been predicting a big media blitz for microchips. But it hasn't materialized yet.
They are making their emissions oops! admissions at 27K Hz which only certain non-human animals, and, possibly alien life forms can hear. You decide which covers (in both ways) Alex.:D :D :D :jaw-dropp :D :D :D
Dog Town
1st February 2007, 05:50 PM
Who could be that dumb?
The same people, who burn twenties... in a microwave?
Because...What is confirmed is the public policy to embed US and European money with high tech tracking devices as part of the hulking surveillance society.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/022904rfidtagsexplode.html
Pictures and all. Theses nutters, are quite comical! Now if they would only search, for the secret chips, in them in the same manner.
Parsman
1st February 2007, 06:22 PM
Because, like, kidnapping is such a problem on Shetland and there are so many places to hid folk?!?! :confused:
Actually this week, after Up Helly Aa, microchips might come in handy for most Shetlanders so they could know where they were and who they are after the celebrations! :D
coalesce
1st February 2007, 06:56 PM
Who is Nick Rockefeller?
Hercules Rockefeller's cousin.
Michael
Gord_in_Toronto
1st February 2007, 07:24 PM
Pulverized to dust less than 100 microns!!
And then spread 10 inches thick all over Manhattan. Oh the HORROR! :cool:
ktesibios
1st February 2007, 07:36 PM
Who is Nick Rockefeller? Where is the evidence that he's a member of the well known American industrialist/philanthropic family?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_family#Descendants_of_John_Davison_Roc kefeller
Well, if you Google "Nicholas Rockefeller" you find this guy (http://www.pacificcouncil.org/interior.aspx?pageID=About&subID=31&itemID=12870)
Nicholas Rockefeller is a partner in the technology group of the law firm of Perkins Coie, and managing director of Rockvest Development Group, an investment company with multinational interests in banking and venture capital. He previously was at the law firm of Troop, Steuber, Pasich, Reddick & Tobey. He is chairman of the Los Angeles Committee on Foreign Relations, serves on the boards of several public and private corporations and is active with a number of nonprofit organizations, including his alma mater, Yale University. Mr. Rockefeller is a frequent lecturer on issues relating to venture capital, the world economy, e-commerce and technology ventures. A participant in the World Economic Forum, he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
It doesn't matter what his relationship to John D., Nelson A. etc. is. His name is Rockefeller and he's a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. That alone is enough to send a traditional conspira-loon into meltdown. The Wikipedia article on Nicholas Rockefeller has already been vandalized with Russo's claims.
OTOH, if you Google "Nick Rockefeller", you come up with multiple pages of conspiracist cybermetastasis of Russo's claim and a freshman swim team member at Wabash College (http://www.wabash.edu/sports/swimming/roster).
Alt+F4
1st February 2007, 07:43 PM
...if you Google "Nick Rockefeller", you come up with multiple pages of conspiracist cybermetastasis of Russo's claim.
Very true. There is NO evidence that the Nick Rockefeller Russo refers to is a member of the John D. Rockefeller family.
T.A.M.
1st February 2007, 08:12 PM
The only question worth asking on this is...
Which one is lieing? Paul Watson (likely)? Russo (very likely)? Nick Rockefeller (possible, but likely not)?
TAM
WildCat
1st February 2007, 08:43 PM
I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats.
JonnyFive
2nd February 2007, 07:36 AM
I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats.
But you wouldn't want them to have kittens. ;)
We had our new cat microchopped a couple months ago. They took her little cat ovaries and now she doesn't pee on the bed anymore.
JonathanClement
6th August 2008, 03:03 AM
http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/
Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.
Lopakhin
6th August 2008, 03:11 AM
And can he just do it? Is this covered by free speech, or can Nick Rockefeller sue him for this? (Theoretically speaking, I guess that Rockefeller will not sue a nobody like Russo.)
My understanding is that you can't sue dead people - certainly that's how it is in the UK, don't know about elsewhere.
JonnyFive
6th August 2008, 06:32 AM
http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/
Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.
Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah...
Registrant:
Zaba, Inc.
2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: NICHOLASROCKEFELLER.NET
Created on: 13-Mar-07
Expires on: 13-Mar-09
Last Updated on: 13-Mar-08
Administrative Contact:
Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com
Zaba, Inc.
2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States
(310) 691-2373
Technical Contact:
Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com
Zaba, Inc.
2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States
(310) 691-2373
Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org (http://www.nicholasrockefeller.org) which is listed as "another" site on the .net.
However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California."
Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection?
Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up?
Alt+F4
7th August 2008, 01:45 AM
http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/
Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.
I saw no evidence on that page that the person in question in a member of the John D. Rockefeller family. Anyone put a link to John D. Rockefeller on a website.
Blender Head
7th August 2008, 09:17 AM
Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah...
Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org (http://www.nicholasrockefeller.org) which is listed as "another" site on the .net.
However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California."
Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection?
Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up?
Funny, that site went up less than a few months after the late Russo's PP article.
dudalb
7th August 2008, 01:10 PM
Did Rockerfeller hire Jarvis Twitch, aka "The Mad Hatter" to design his mind control chips?
IF so, someone tell Batman, for Heaven's sake.
At times I really think CTers take a LOT of their theories from Comic Books.
JonathanClement
7th August 2008, 02:42 PM
Not mind controll. "Tracking chips".
boloboffin
7th August 2008, 09:44 PM
Nick Rockefeller? I thought it was Julian Rockefeller that wanted to microchop everybody.
albie
8th August 2008, 03:52 AM
So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying.
albie
8th August 2008, 04:02 AM
"it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model."
I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents.
Can't say that I love the state though.
Nor do most people.
I suppose they are talking about nursery school. Who could afford that?
JonnyFive
8th August 2008, 08:21 AM
So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying.
Other than the fact that no evidence seems to exist to verify what he says, and all the "evidence" shown seems to lead in a circle back to various non-authorities, and the fact that nobody can even verify that Nicholas Rockefeller is even who Russo says he is...
No, other than those things I guess we can't discredit Russo. Like, Russo hasn't actually said "yeah, all that stuff I said was a load of crap."
Still, he's pretty much batting 0.000 here.
Well, maybe 0.010 since there does seem to actually be a "Nicholas Rockefeller" somewhere out there.
JonnyFive
8th August 2008, 08:23 AM
"it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model."
I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents.
Eh? I don't recall any of my schooling being designed to indoctrinate me into accepting the state as anything.
Beerina
8th August 2008, 11:56 AM
And what,exactly,is wrong with microchip implants?
http://www.animationalley.com/images/prints/mpa/mpa_trek9.jpg
Ehhh, only if you like ultra-gorgeous females with huge lips, long blonde hair, and magnificent, curvy hips who are physically strong enough to throw you around and do what they want with you.
...if you are lucky.
I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101.
That free society economics supports growing a population (http://juliansimon.org/writings/Ultimate_Resource/TCHAR25.txt) over the long-term faddish prudery with respect to it really relegates this thought to full-blown woo-woo-ism, both from the CT aspect of it, and the eco-nut aspect of it.
Cuddles
15th August 2008, 07:26 AM
I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101.
To be fair, shrinking your neighbouring populations would work just as well. Which is presumably why we see the populations of rivals like China and India shrinking so quickly that they are well on their way to becoming the least populous countries in the world. Or something.
Confuseling
15th August 2008, 08:52 AM
There's a setting for "microchop" on my Cuisinart, right next to "frappe". I must have gotten one of the NWO models.
My microwave has a button on it labelled "Chaos defrost". Honestly.
I'm too frightened to press it.
INRM
17th August 2008, 11:21 AM
Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?
I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?
INRM
Jontg
17th August 2008, 01:09 PM
They can't--an RFID chip doesn't do that. All it does is verify that the bill is genuine.
Foolmewunz
17th August 2008, 05:21 PM
Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?
I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?
INRM
Alex? Alex? Is that you?
That's Prison Planet type gold, that is. RFID can be active or passive. To actively track every bill in circulation would probably cost more than those bills are worth.
"Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells."
ktesibios
17th August 2008, 06:33 PM
Alex? Alex? Is that you?
"Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells."
Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads.
JonnyFive
18th August 2008, 07:59 AM
Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?
I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?
INRM
I know like three people beat me to it, but RFID chips don't work like that. An active RFID chip requires a power supply to actively transmit, and even so would be limited in range. A long-range transmitter of the type needed to track someone would require a power supply and antenna a bit larger than would conventionally fit into, say, a dollar bill.
The RFID chips being discussed are similar to those you might find a in DVD movie in a store. It will respond to a particular signal within a very short range to allow for bill verification. Any claims of global RFID tracking networks are pure hooey - it simply isn't physically possible with a device that small.
I suppose you could develop an immense network of passive RFID reading stations. You'd need one every thirty feet or so in order to read the RFID tags, and you'd need a way to uniquely identify and track every single piece of money in circulation.
Did I mention that a moderately strong magnet will fry the RFID circuit?
Billdave2
18th August 2008, 09:48 AM
Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads.
That lightweight junk? you should do what I do, I have all my assets in these.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones
abenja1
18th August 2008, 03:26 PM
Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence.
JonnyFive
19th August 2008, 06:28 AM
Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence.
The government microwave death rays destroyed all his film, I'm sure.
© 2001-2008, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.