Merc and his four Citgo witnesses

[mortimer]

Here's a conversation Merc and I had over on the pentacon.info board. He hasn't confirmed my summation of his position yet. Of course he hasn't. It totally blows his whole little "theory" out of the water.

The damage, all the way to the C-ring, as outlined by the asce report only works exclusively with a plane on the south side coming in low into the first floor.

It also prevents the low level to the ground surveillance video craft from jiving.

Wouldn't your same witnesses have seen another plane approaching from the other side of the Citgo? Did any of them mention another plane to the south?

Yes and Nope.

OK, let me sum this up. Your 4 Citgo witnesses saw a plane pass to the north of the Citgo. You also say that the damage to the Pentagon "only works exclusively with a plane on the south side". And you have answered that your witnesses would have seen a plane coming from the south side, but they didn't see one.

Is that correct?

If the damage to the Pentagon, by Merc's admission, could only be caused by a plane passing to the south of the Citgo, and his star witnesses didn't see this plane, although they would have HAD to have seen it, how reliable can these witnesses be?

[CHF]

If the damage to the Pentagon, by Merc's admission, could only be caused by a plane passing to the south of the Citgo, and his star witnesses didn't see this plane, although they would have HAD to have seen it, how reliable can these witnesses be?

It's all he's got.

It's sort of like how one of Dylan Avery's Pentagon witnesses says he saw the plane.

Just imagine arguing a case from that weak a position...

[Bobert]

Yes but Grand Juries will be called as a result of this film people!

[babazaroni]

Lyte thinks the pentagon security camera video was tampered by the removal of frames. Presumably, these missing frames would have identified the object as something other than an AA airliner.

I think they believe something came from south of citgo to cause the damage, while the airliner was north of citgo and flew over.

All very silly of course.

[gumboot]

Lyte thinks the pentagon security camera video was tampered by the removal of frames. Presumably, these missing frames would have identified the object as something other than an AA airliner.


Kinda funny. The cameras were running at 1fps. About normal for a security camera.

Blurry images, can't see nuttin.

-Gumboot

[mortimer]

Lyte thinks the pentagon security camera video was tampered by the removal of frames. Presumably, these missing frames would have identified the object as something other than an AA airliner.

I think they believe something came from south of citgo to cause the damage, while the airliner was north of citgo and flew over.

All very silly of course.

But he admits that it was an airliner that went south of the Citgo that hit the Pentagon. And that his witnesses should have seen it, but didn't.

[alexg]

Lyte thinks the pentagon security camera video was tampered by the removal of frames. Presumably, these missing frames would have identified the object as something other than an AA airliner.

I think they believe something came from south of citgo to cause the damage, while the airliner was north of citgo and flew over.

All very silly of course.

Something other than an airliner maybe, but I guess he also has to account for the lack of a Boeing flying through or above the explosion and cloud? You think?

[Gravy]

Yes but Grand Juries will be called as a result of this film people!Only at Cannes! Le Palme de ***** pour les idiots!

[babazaroni]

But he admits that it was an airliner that went south of the Citgo that hit the Pentagon. And that his witnesses should have seen it, but didn't.

OK, he thinks the airliner came from south of citgo, and maybe he thinks the missing frames shows the north of citgo flyover?

All stupid, but fun to guess the mind of a dedicated CT'er.

[Totovader]

Here's a conversation Merc and I had over on the pentacon.info board. He hasn't confirmed my summation of his position yet. Of course he hasn't. It totally blows his whole little "theory" out of the water.

If the damage to the Pentagon, by Merc's admission, could only be caused by a plane passing to the south of the Citgo, and his star witnesses didn't see this plane, although they would have HAD to have seen it, how reliable can these witnesses be?

What will be interesting to watch is to see how badly they manipulate the witnesses and their statements to make their position look infallible. They most certainly will not discuss the contradictions in their theory- because it will show just how ridiculous it is.

Not a single witness is saying what they're saying- but they're just going to take what the witnesses do say completely out of context and insert their own graphics during the statements in order to make it look like the witnesses mean something else.