Davidjayjordan won't name the book.

[Mr.D]

I like real skeptics not the false ones. I like people with courage and strength of mind and heart. I don;t see your names anywhere as starting any thread. have you not found one truth to which base one topic thread on..


Is the title of this thread a truth or not? Discuss.

So what's the name of the book?


The deceivers hate to answer questions


So what's the name of the book?


Come on someone be brave enough to want to know cause and the eventual effect.


So let's start with the cause; What's the name of the book?

[Alareth]

Do we really need him avoiding the same question in two threads?

[Davidjayjordan]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads. And I am hardly a subjective title for a NEW THREAD. get your act together.
As I already long ago posted what book was pro-suicide and being forced on students in Canada. I opposed it, but nobody and mean nobody else opposed it on 'True Skeptics versus false skeptics' suggesting they all must therefore approve of it.

I oppose making me a TITLE in a NEW THREAD. If you want to mock so be it, go to the appropriate thread on this BOARD.

Learn proper discussion board rules

[Alareth]

See? Avoiding the answer to a simple question in two threads.

I predicted it. Where's my $1,000,000?

[Davidjayjordan]

As posted long ago, on the True Skeptics thread, the book was entitled "Essays of the Future' a compilation of essays and short stories.

That's all I will tell you, as anyone could eventually trace my personal information if I tell you more.....

And it is a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE..

NUMBER NINE...



You will not post a person's private information that is not otherwise publicly available. And so if I continue to give you more information, you could find out my personal information.... by trying to ridicule and harass me into saying more that what I have given you.

By doing so it would leave me vulnerable for further threats as already mentioned in the other thread.

For similarly vile wrathful posters on a different newsgroup tried to get me fired by tracing me down from personal information they gleaned.

So I am appealing this THREAD to the Moderators.

Remove this now !!!!

[LashL]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads. And I am hardly a subjective title for a NEW THREAD. get your act together.
As I already long ago posted what book was pro-suicide and being forced on students in Canada. I opposed it, but nobody and mean nobody else opposed it on 'True Skeptics versus false skeptics' suggesting they all must therefore approve of it.

I oppose making me a TITLE in a NEW THREAD. If you want to mock so be it, go to the appropriate thread on this BOARD.

Learn proper discussion board rules

The answer is simple, DavidJayJordan. Name the book and post the relevant details about where and when it was allegedly part of any school curriculum so that your allegations can be fact checked.

I am also in Canada, and I have found nothing whatsoever that supports your allegations about any such book as you've described being "forced on students in Canada" or ever being part of any school curriculum, and, frankly, I think that you're full of crap.

You can, of course, prove me wrong by providing proper facts and evidence in support of your claims but so far, you have failed and refused to do so.

You have claimed that you "fought" against this as yet unidentified book as a result of a tearful episode in a supermarket, and you have claimed that it was written by some as yet unidentified columnist employed by the Toronto Star newspaper. I have not been able to independently locate a single piece of evidence in support of your claims, and you have not proffered a single piece of evidence in support of your claims.

Thus, is it fair to say that you should either back up your claim with facts and evidence or retract your unsubstantiated claims. It's as simple as that, really.

[Zep]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads.But you just did! More than once!

Get your act together - sheesh!

[Hokulele]

At least he figured out where the apostrophe is on his keyboard.

[Gravy]

As posted long ago, on the True Skeptics thread, the book was entitled "Essays of the Future' a compilation of essays and short stories.Nothing in the Library of Congress catalog, nothing in Alibris, nothing in Google, nothing in the New York or Brooklyn Public library catalogs. I think you got the title wrong, David.

[fuelair]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads. And I am hardly a subjective title for a NEW THREAD. get your act together.
As I already long ago posted what book was pro-suicide and being forced on students in Canada. I opposed it, but nobody and mean nobody else opposed it on 'True Skeptics versus false skeptics' suggesting they all must therefore approve of it.

I oppose making me a TITLE in a NEW THREAD. If you want to mock so be it, go to the appropriate thread on this BOARD.

Learn proper discussion board rules

I could have sworn you said you were going away - ah well, it was just another silly bit of fluff in your writings I guess. Another inaccuracy/untruth also.

[fuelair]

Get mocked. and -as so often state in so many threads, you don't get to make the rules in your own or others threads. If this annoys you, you are free to go away. - as you already said you were doing.

[fuelair]

Nothing on Dogpile or Amazon.com either. Just another in the pile of error that makes up DJ. Checked as both on and of (benefit of doubt concept)

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

As posted long ago, on the True Skeptics thread, the book was entitled "Essays of the Future' a compilation of essays and short stories.

That's all I will tell you, as anyone could eventually trace my personal information if I tell you more.....

And it is a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE..

NUMBER NINE...


You will not post a person's private information that is not otherwise publicly available. And so if I continue to give you more information, you could find out my personal information.... by trying to ridicule and harass me into saying more that what I have given you.

By doing so it would leave me vulnerable for further threats as already mentioned in the other thread.

For similarly vile wrathful posters on a different newsgroup tried to get me fired by tracing me down from personal information they gleaned.

So I am appealing this THREAD to the Moderators.

Remove this now !!!!

Your name and picture are available the website to which you link in your own sig.

[CurtC]

Your name and picture are available the website to which you link in your own sig.Shhhhh! Mentioning that's a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE!:boggled:

[T.A.M.]

As posted long ago, on the True Skeptics thread, the book was entitled "Essays of the Future' a compilation of essays and short stories.

That's all I will tell you, as anyone could eventually trace my personal information if I tell you more.....

And it is a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE..

NUMBER NINE...



You will not post a person's private information that is not otherwise publicly available. And so if I continue to give you more information, you could find out my personal information.... by trying to ridicule and harass me into saying more that what I have given you.

By doing so it would leave me vulnerable for further threats as already mentioned in the other thread.

For similarly vile wrathful posters on a different newsgroup tried to get me fired by tracing me down from personal information they gleaned.

So I am appealing this THREAD to the Moderators.

Remove this now !!!!


Lighten up. Noone here is even interested in your identity, let alone actively persuing it. Noone here has broken the rules, nor are they asking you to. Trying to accuse people here of "forcing you into violating the rules" is rediculous. I have seen many "Usernames" placed in the title of threads here, so I cannot see it being a violation either. Both Skeptics and Truthers have been listed in the titles here. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

TAM:mad:

[milesalpha]

I'm pretty sure the book can be found in Christophera's unnamed documentary.

[Kiwiwriter]

Your personal information is already given up, with you putting your e-mail address and web page in your signature block.

And yes, I went to the web page, and it has the photograph of you and your wife, and a lot of material on sex and magic, a guest book, visit counter, links, and prophecies. From what I've read, you've got a lot on the line already.

For example, your mathematics tells us that the Battle of Armageddon will take place on August 4-5, 2016. Let's see, August 4th. Right. That's the anniversary of both the outbreak of the First World War and the opening of the Panama Canal. The same day, back in 1914.

It's also the birthday of Roger Clemens. Bummer. I guess his family won't get to celebrate. He'll be 54.

I'll check back on August 6, 2016, to see how you explain the failure of the world to end.

So don't give me any rubbish about fearing for your safety and needing to remain anonymous. You've put yourself in the public arena. When you do so, you can expect to receive comment, both positive and negative.

Jesus dealt with it. Now it's your turn.

[T.A.M.]

KIWI:
Now you had to go and tell me that (I never noticed his website in his sig).

DJJ:
Your site certainly lets me know what perspective you are coming from. I find it pointless to argue with you on anything from here on in.

TAM:)

[NobbyNobbs]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads.


Too late.

[Free Thinkr]

And yes, I went to the web page, and it has the photograph of you and your wife, and a lot of material on sex and magic
Anything on blood and sugar?

[NobbyNobbs]

And yes, I went to the web page, and it has the photograph of you and your wife, and a lot of material on sex and magic, a guest book, visit counter, links, and prophecies. From what I've read, you've got a lot on the line already.


From his website:


Once you realize that Jesus himself created sex, then your whole attitude
about the most pleasurable experience in life should change. For it is not evil
but good. Sex didn’t come about by accident or evolutionary mutations but by
design. Evolution didn’t create sex, nor did the Devil who tries to take the credit for it, but theKing of Kings, Jesus created Sex.


Wow. So all those people listed in the bible who came before Jesus? Spontaneous generation.

Or perhaps he was the last virgin birth, rather than the first. I wonder, does "begat" have a meaning we didn't know about?

[chipmunk stew]

From his website:




Wow. So all those people listed in the bible who came before Jesus? Spontaneous generation.

Or perhaps he was the last virgin birth, rather than the first. I wonder, does "begat" have a meaning we didn't know about?
It's a Trinitarian thing. Since the Father and the Son are both God, and God created sex, then the Son created sex.

[jmercer]

Shhhhh! Mentioning that's a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE!:boggled:

No, it's not.

[Irony]

This is not my thread, I don't post on other people's threads.

Must...resist...urge...to...point...out...obvious.

[Kiwiwriter]

KIWI:
Now you had to go and tell me that (I never noticed his website in his sig).

DJJ:
Your site certainly lets me know what perspective you are coming from. I find it pointless to argue with you on anything from here on in.

TAM:)



Well, someone always has to go and say, "Hey, the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes!" :D

[NoZed Avenger]

Well, someone always has to go and say, "Hey, the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes!" :D



Couldn't it JUST ONCE be an empress?!


Preferably, played by Alessandra Ambrosio.


Is that too much to ask?!

[T.A.M.]

well there is always "Child-Like", but I doubt she'd appreciate us seeing her naked.

TAM;)

[JimBenArm]

well there is always "Child-Like", but I doubt she'd appreciate us seeing her naked.

TAM;)
I'm not sure I'd appreciate seeing it, either!

[Blackwell]

...That's all I will tell you, as anyone could eventually trace my personal information if I tell you more.....

And it is a VIOLATION OF THE RULES HERE..

NUMBER NINE...



You will not post a person's private information that is not otherwise publicly available. And so if I continue to give you more information, you could find out my personal information.... by trying to ridicule and harass me into saying more that what I have given you...

a. No one is posting your private information, and no one is asking YOU to post your private information.

b. If your identity has been revealed in a published book, then I think that would be considered "publicly available."

[Horatius]

a. No one is posting your private information, and no one is asking YOU to post your private information.

b. If your identity has been revealed in a published book, then I think that would be considered "publicly available."

Not to mention that that rule doesn't say a single thing about asking someone for their personal information. There's no rule against asking, and I seriously doubt anyone would get in trouble for posting their own information. This rule simply prevents others from posting that info, if they learned it through some other means.

Of course, I don't expect this lying liar to admit the difference.

[chipmunk stew]

And yes, I went to the web page, and it has the photograph of you and your wife, and a lot of material on sex and magic, a guest book, visit counter, links, and prophecies. From what I've read, you've got a lot on the line already.
Strangely, though, there's also this disclaimer:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/djj.png (http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/IMO.html)

Wow, no wonder he's so concerned about his safety! Take a look at his and his wife's horrible testimonies!
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Ourwildridetestimony.html
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/IwasaRussianspy.html
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Iwasoneofcanadatenmostwanted.html
http://www.geocities.com/goddess_trixie2000/DeliveredfromPrison.html

[Björn Toulouse]

For example, your mathematics tells us that the Battle of Armageddon will take place on August 4-5, 2016...


I'll check back on August 6, 2016, to see how you explain the failure of the world to end.


2009
http://www.eliyah.com/forum2/Forum1/HTML/003174.html

2011
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/MathematicaldatesofEndTime.html

2012
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/LastGeneration.html


Even a broken clock (analog) shows the correct time twice a day.

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Strangely, though, there's also this disclaimer:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/djj.png (http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/IMO.html)

Wow, no wonder he's so concerned about his safety! Take a look at his and his wife's horrible testimonies!
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Ourwildridetestimony.html
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/IwasaRussianspy.html
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Iwasoneofcanadatenmostwanted.html
http://www.geocities.com/goddess_trixie2000/DeliveredfromPrison.html

What about this one (http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Graduation.jpg) though?

[Kiwiwriter]

Couldn't it JUST ONCE be an empress?!


Preferably, played by Alessandra Ambrosio.


Is that too much to ask?!

Can I take Gabrielle Union instead? Hubba-hubba! :D

[Kiwiwriter]

2009
http://www.eliyah.com/forum2/Forum1/HTML/003174.html

2011
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/MathematicaldatesofEndTime.html

2012
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/LastGeneration.html


Even a broken clock (analog) shows the correct time twice a day.

Well, there you have it, more proof that you can say anything you want with numbers and statistics.

When I was a kid, Willie Stargell's wife Dee was going around warning people on behalf of the Jehovah's Witnesses that 1975 would be the year of the "tribulation." She told an interviewer she didn't know if she should install a swimming pool in her house for her family. When I heard this, I wanted to send her a telegram saying, "Go ahead. Install the pool."

So my questions for David Jay Jordan on his end-time prophecies:

1. Are you still putting money away into the retirement account?
2. Ever heard of the Millerites?
3. What are you going to do when the world does not end on schedule?

[jaydeehess]

Because some people just don't understand that the system or the world just isn't a nice place run by nice people and that the justice system is run by mere mortals who aren't always moral, so allow me to write down my experiences with the San ****** and Los ******** Police Departments. But it isn't on any official records, nevertheless it is true so help me God.

'True skeptics' will always take the phrase 'so help me God' to mean that the lack of any corroborating evidence is completely unneccessary because they know that if he was not telling the objective truth about this event he would be struck and killed on the spot by a bolt of lightning.

DJJ' s biggest problem with skeptics seems to be that we won't automatically take DJJ at his word.

[Comsat Angel]

A stopped clock is not right twice per day if it's a 24-hour clock.
August 6th 2016 would also constitute the centenary of the Battle of the Somme (but it did last from 24/6/16 to 18/11/16, so it's a sort of moveable feast) with all the woe that incurs.

[jhunter1163]

I'm sorry, I came in late. Did he ever name the book?

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I'm sorry, I came in late. Did he ever name the book?
Yes. "Essays of the Future". The only mention anyone can seem to find of a book by that name is one that's "dedicated to Nick Metropolis, the sole survivor of the original Los Alamos group. (http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1999/rota.html)"

This likely isn't the book he's talking about, though.

[Unsecured Coins]

I tried to see his page but as soon as I heard Celene Dion I had to drown it out with some Corrosion Of Conformity