A flow chart of science versus faith

[Faustina]

Can't get any simpler. (http://stupidevilbastard.com/Images2/sciencevsfaith.png)

[Beady]

Saved for future plagiarism.

[Davidjayjordan]

Tis true, false science is rampant with faith rather than facts as they even try to manufacture evidence to prop up their belief system and gain admiration among their congregations, and fill their pockets with rersearch money if they just keep promoting the false science, the false scientists want to hear.

Oh well true science goes on and keeps connecting up truths and laws together as ONE.

IE String theory or unfied field theory. Or in the study of any true science topic.

[Foster Zygote]

Or in the study of any true science topic.

Like astronomy? How far away is the moon again?

[Davidjayjordan]

Like astronomy? How far away is the moon again?

Von Braum and NASA confirmed exactly that the Earth is exactly 216,000 miles away from the Earth moon combination or barry center. exactly what the ancients said, exactly. Amazing confirmation.

No wonder 216 was used to represent the Moon.

But this thread is about false science and their false faith in noithingness and how evolution fakes evidence for their congregation's praise.

or was the poriginal poster talking about something else that false skeptics believe and false science believes

[Foster Zygote]

Von Braum and NASA confirmed exactly that the Earth is exactly 216,000 miles away from the Earth moon combination or barry center. exactly what the ancients said, exactly. Amazing confirmation.

No wonder 216 was used to represent the Moon.

But this thread is about false science and their false faith in noithingness and how evolution fakes evidence for their congregation's praise.

or was the poriginal poster talking about something else that false skeptics believe and false science believes

No it is not. The barycenter (note the spelling) is located below the surface of the Earth. Please examine this illustration from Space.com.

[Kopji]

We discussed this the other day somewhere on another thread. (It happened to coincide with me needing some practice in Excel).

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/106145d7f9a56e2f5.jpg

I think that it is a flawed idea that 'faith' is simple. Faith is very complex, especially compared to science. Faith based decisions need to be supported and propped up by authority, reinforced and repeated.

[jjramsey]

Can't get any simpler. (http://stupidevilbastard.com/Images2/sciencevsfaith.png)

The thing is that the right-hand flowchart describes generic confirmation bias, not faith. Religion is all over the map in how it responds to evidence. Sometimes it is ignored. Other times it is challenged by apologetics, and still other times, the tenets of the faith are modified or reinterpreted to accommodate the evidence, albeit in an often inelegant fashion.