View Full Version : "there is a huge lack of facts and evidence to base any theory upon"
greyleonard
15th March 2007, 03:17 AM
I just think this is an interesting specimen.
Andre II : Ever considered the possibility that I don't have any theory on this issue cause there is a huge lack of facts and evidence to base any theory upon.
So even if it hurts the feeling of critical thinkers who prefer to laugh about other people's hypothesises I'm sorry to tell you that all I want an all I'm asking for is that
there is finally an official statement concerning the issue
evidence presented
We have so many people in arabica countries having the same name and sharing part of the identities of the alleged hijackers who right after 9/11 appeared in the media stressing the fact that they have nothing to do with 9/11. Why has not one of the alumnis come forward to tell that he has nothing to do with 9/11 and why has the media never bothered to investigate this?
link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=147404&mesg_id=149007)
Zep
15th March 2007, 03:24 AM
Arabica countries?? :confused: What has coffee beans got to do with it now??
Gravy
15th March 2007, 03:54 AM
With the amount of information available on the internet, people like Andre could answer their own questions in little more than the time it takes to write them. But because they frequent conspiracist sites, they get the impression that questions that were answered five years ago remain mysteries.
And if he wants to see some "Alumnis," he should go to Al Qaeda Homecoming Week, which is held each October.
gumboot
15th March 2007, 05:38 AM
Is it just me, or is he suggesting the Administration may have carried out 9/11 because none of them have denied it?
And is that, or is that not the most absurd thing you ever heard?
I notice George Bush has never once denied responsibility for Hiroshima. Clearly GUILTY!
-Gumboot
ref
15th March 2007, 05:43 AM
Is it just me, or is he suggesting the Administration may have carried out 9/11 because none of them have denied it?
And is that, or is that not the most absurd thing you ever heard?
I notice George Bush has never once denied responsibility for Hiroshima. Clearly GUILTY!
-Gumboot
He is suggesting that after an Air Force Statement reported that the alleged hijackers are not identical to the alumnis of U.S. military courses, the media ceased to report on the issue. He says this is part of some grand conspiracy, because no media has interviewed these non-hijackers.
MRC_Hans
15th March 2007, 05:49 AM
Wouldn't "There is a huge lack of facts and evidence on which to base any theory" be better English?
Hans
chippy
15th March 2007, 06:03 AM
With the amount of information available on the internet, people like Andre could answer their own questions in little more than the time it takes to write them. But because they frequent conspiracist sites, they get the impression that questions that were answered five years ago remain mysteries.
And if he wants to see some "Alumnis," he should go to Al Qaeda Homecoming Week, which is held each October.
Aaaahahaha, your answers are always the best.
gumboot
15th March 2007, 06:35 AM
He is suggesting that after an Air Force Statement reported that the alleged hijackers are not identical to the alumnis of U.S. military courses, the media ceased to report on the issue. He says this is part of some grand conspiracy, because no media has interviewed these non-hijackers.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks.
Yes, I can imagine that...
NEWSCASTER: Tonight on CNN, a special report, as our Criminal Correspondant, Nick Jones, interviews a man who claims he wasn't one of the alleged hijackers on 9/11.
JONES: Thanks Michael. As we know, the 19 hijackers who carried out the September 11 attacks all died when their aircraft crashed, killing all aboard. But there's a little known post script to this American tragedy that has, until now, been ignored by the media. With me today is Alhijah Mukhtar, a resident in Florida. How does this man fit into the 9/11 terrorist attacks? When I began investigating his story early last month, I came across a startling revelation; Mr Mukhtar has no connection whatsoever to the September 11 hijackers. Indeed, despite being of Middle Eastern origins, and a practising Muslim, Mukhtar is not a member of Al Qaeda, and has never met a member of the international Islamic terror group. But his story doesn't end there. Prior to never having any contact with the September 11 hijackers, Mr Mukhtar graduated from an American Military training course. The very same course that none of the 9/11 hijackers were ever on.
NEWSCASTER: Startling revelations, Nick. We'll return in just a moment with a startling story of non-involvement from the man who wasn't at the centre of the worst terrorist attacks in American history. But first, breaking news, as we cross live to Chicago where an enormous lizard is not terrorising the city...
-Gumboot
steve s
15th March 2007, 03:56 PM
Wouldn't "There is a huge lack of facts and evidence on which to base any theory" be better English?
Hans
Not to mention dropping the 's' from the word "alumnis." :p
Steve S
Regnad Kcin
15th March 2007, 04:23 PM
gumboot, you slay me!
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.