PDA

View Full Version : Those who veil women and those who let them walk around with bare breasts (Serious)


FireGarden
23rd July 2003, 04:11 AM
I decided to start a new thread, because it would have got less attention in AtheistWorld.Com's thread since he is not a troll worthy of people's attention.

AW.C has some ligitimate gripes about the way atheists are treated in some parts of the world. But he decides not to attack the behaviour. Instead he attacks a group that seems to be rapidly becoming the 21st century's whipping boy.


You might find this account interesting:
http://waf.gn.apc.org/journal8p16.htm
In the late fifties and early sixties, most of us - my Algerian friends and fellow students colleges activists - were openly secularists, not religiously inclined, and certainly not practising; we were engaged in a liberation struggle in the name of nationalism and socialism, not in the name of religion. In the elder generation, the practising Muslims we knew and did activist work with were generous and humane, drawing from their faith the strength to banish racial hatred from their hearts even under colonisation, even during the liberation war - they were a world apart from todays fundamentalists.

[...]
In other words, my political upbringing was shaped by women and men who - atheists, Muslims, Christians or Jews - stood for principles, drawn from indeed different sources but leading them all to common positions on rights of people to decide for themselves, on anticolonialism, on social justice and human rights.

[...] Visitors of the newly independent Algeria were amazed at the absence of racism or feelings of hatred, revenge and retaliation, after a seven year long war which killed 2 million Algerian people, according to FLN sources.

It is therefore even more surprising to witness the monopolisation of these values by Islamic fundamentalists, slowly but surely within nearly forty years after independence, and to track similar trends in so many other Muslim countries. Intolerance prevails against Algerians who are non Muslims and, worse, non believers, against agnosticists and atheists. Xenophobia against foreigners has led to their recent killing; explosion of violence and murder of intellectuals and of women who have become the main targets of fundamentalism, is justified by their not being 'good Muslims', or not enough, be it in their day to day and private behaviour or in their political stands. While we fought a seven year war to be able to call ourselves 'Algerians' -and no more 'Muslims' or 'indigenous' as the French colonisers did - we have now gone back to colonial labels and fundamentalists have imposed on all the Algerian people a single forced 'Muslim' identity, exclusive of any other.

Moreover, this label is being adopted by many people outside Algeria who, a few decades ago would not have dared call us a Muslim (but respectfully an Algerian), and now feel thoroughly dissatisfied with our sole national identity and insist on labelling us by religion, ethnicity or tribe (it happened to me so many times), and do not even see any problem in insisting on it.

[...]
Is one a Muslim by birth? Is it as unwashable [as] the original sin? Is it a race? a colour? A culture? If it were a culture, does it mean that all Muslims of the world are alike? Those who veil women and those who let them walk around with bare breasts; those who practice female genital mutilation and those who have never heard of this practice; those who seclude women and those who export them as domestic workers in the Gulf countries; those who have women as heads of state and of political parties and those who forbid them to drive a car; those who believe in God and those who are communists and atheists. Can anyone declare against your will that you are or should be a Muslim? Because of your birth place, your family origins, your country?

I should add that I have Muslim parents. Since I was about 12, they have prayed five times a day (or as close to that as they could manage). Some would automatically call me Muslim, but I have never had religious faith - I don't even know how to pray. Two of my sisters have married Christians, one of my uncles married a Jew. My sisters are highly educated, all of them work, one as a doctor.

I have been openly atheist with my family for as long as I can remember. I seem to have gotten less stick than some of the Americans in Christian families on this forum.

Islam is much too broad a "church" to be considered a single culture.

MRC_Hans
23rd July 2003, 04:26 AM
Originally posted by GoodPropaganda
*snip*
Islam is much too broad a "church" to be considered a single culture. Of course! Those who try to claim that are bigots, only marginally better than the Moslem fundies they are talking against (marginally better, because they are usually less violent).

In medieval Europe, it was the Moslem dominated countries, like Spain, where tolerance and culture thrived and prospered. Once the Christians came back in power, darkness descended.

However, I think moderate (and secular) Moslems all over the World can be blamed for not being more outspoken. Their failure to do so is part of the reason why the bigots can brandish their prejudices without meeting much opposition.

Hans

AtheistWorld.Com
23rd July 2003, 04:32 AM
So, do you and your parents live in a Muslim country? cause i doubt you and your siblings would get away with such liberalism in the family in a Muslim country.

Max

FireGarden
23rd July 2003, 10:22 AM
So, do you and your parents live in a Muslim country? cause i doubt you and your siblings would get away with such liberalism in the family in a Muslim country.
Why not?
I was in Syria (where most of my extended family live) when I was 12. The most fuss anyone made is that my mother's aunt wanted to show me how to pray. No hostility at all.

Only the older generation of women put on headscarves, nobody at all covered up in a black parachute.

My most religious uncle played music at my sister's birthday, along with a pretty large band of his friends. Great rhythms, very entertaining. It would have made the Taliban spit blood, but there you have it. And they didn't have to play in a secret, sound-proofed room.



On a different topic,
I've been trying to find out what religion Megawati Sukarnoputri, President of Indonesia, is. I know that she was head of the Christian-nationalist Indonesian Democratic Party in 1995. And here it says that she sung carols at Christmas. http://asiapacificuniverse.com/features/person_year02.htm

But she can't be Christian (or a woman) because Indonesia's religious make-up is:
Muslim 88%, Protestant 5%, Roman Catholic 3%, Hindu 2%, Buddhist 1%, other 1% (1998)
according to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/id.html

(Admittedly, there was some hassle making her president even after she won the majority of the vote, but she got there in the end! She was blocked by a Muslim group leader, Hamzah Haz, who later became her Vice-President! http://www.pakistanlink.com/nayyer/08032001.html)

Dancing David
23rd July 2003, 10:33 AM
I think that from the contact that I have had with our local iman, Islam is a compassionate faith like many faiths, it is misinterpreted by many.

Loki
23rd July 2003, 07:07 PM
Dancing Dave,

...Islam is a compassionate faith like many faiths, it is misinterpreted by many.
But what is the criteria used to determine "correctly interpreted Islam" from "misinterpreted Islam" (or any other religoin, for that matter)?

If you use "the interpretation currently supported by the greatest number of people" you get a religion that can mean anything at anytime.

If you use "the interpretation supported by the greatest number of scholars and theologians" you get a elitest view of the religion that (may) lack day-to-day relevence.

If you use "the interpretation closest the original" you have the twin problems of (a) determining what precisely the original was; and (b) creating a religon that cannot evolve.

In the end, I think most people use the criteria "The correct interpretation of Religion 'X' is whatever I personally find 'most acceptable'". Religion is in the eye of the beholder, in other words. How can it be any other way? In the case of Islam, it is what it's followers want it to be.

FireGarden
24th July 2003, 01:23 AM
Loki,
If you use "the interpretation currently supported by the greatest number of people" you get a religion that can mean anything at anytime.
Or, if you use "the interpretation locally (or individually) favoured" you get a religion that means something different to different people. So "Religion is in the eye of the beholder, in other words". Which is the point I'm trying to make.

Just as Christians choose those parts of Christianity that suite their tastes, you'll find Muslims do the same. If they need to go to war, the text is there. If they need to co-operate, the text is there. If they need to modernise and grow, the text is there. If they need to stay with what is comfortable and familiar, the text is there.

It's a religion like any other, so it has to cover all the bases.

reprise
24th July 2003, 02:07 AM
But she can't be Christian (or a woman)because Indonesia's religious make-up is:
Muslim 88%, Protestant 5%, Roman Catholic 3%, Hindu 2%, Buddhist 1%, other 1% (1998) according to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications...ok/geos/id.html

Indonesia is not an Islamic republic, even though the vast majority of its citizens are of the Muslim faith; the government of Indonesia is secular and so there is no inherent conflict in the country having a leader who is not a member of the nation's dominant religion. I did a quick search for details on Megawati's personal religious convictions, but didn't find anything (Christian would be an pretty good guess, though, I suspect) relevant.

FireGarden
24th July 2003, 12:09 PM
reprise,
My point was that she is popular. Which contradicts the frequent misconceptions about how Muslims regard other faiths.

(And of course, I never doubted she was a woman - but you probably new that :p)

RCNelson
24th July 2003, 01:37 PM
reprise:
Christian would be an pretty good guess, though, I suspect Megawati Sukarnoputri is not Christian, but a progressive Muslim at the opposite end of the Islamic spectrum from the Wahabis.

Google: "Muslim Women" AND "Megawati Sukarnoputri"

Sundog
24th July 2003, 01:44 PM
I want to complain about the total lack of tittilating material in this thread.

reprise
24th July 2003, 03:47 PM
Originally posted by GoodPropaganda
reprise,
My point was that she is popular. Which contradicts the frequent misconceptions about how Muslims regard other faiths.

(And of course, I never doubted she was a woman - but you probably new that :p)

One point worth remembering is that although Indonesia has its fair share of Muslim extremists (who do - indeed - regard those of other faiths as "infidels"), they are not in the majority. As Muslim populations go, Indonesia's is moderate and doesn't seek to impose the strict doctrines of fundamentalist Islam on either its own Muslim population or those Indonesians who are of other faiths (Bali, in particular, would cease to exist as we know it if Muslim extremists were in the majority in Indonesia).

FireGarden
24th July 2003, 05:18 PM
RCNelson: Internet Detective!
Thanks for the googling lesson!

I found this site http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/word/mcelroy4.html which focuses on the diversity of women in Islam. I liked this quote:
In Lebanon "it is not uncommon to see two girls in Beirut, one in complete hijab, the other in heavy make-up and tight dress, walking hand-in-hand. Lebanon's diversity is reflected in strange ways."
I suppose I'll have to resort to Tariq Aziz as a prominant Christian politician in a predominantly Muslim country. Unfortunately, I don't think he was popular as Megawati. :D

Motorhead's Lemmy:
The eight of spades!
The eight of spades!
Alright!!

Loki
24th July 2003, 05:22 PM
Good Propaganda,

Motorhead's Lemmy:
The eight of spades!
The eight of spades!
Alright!!
That would "Ace of Spades" - or am I missing a subtle 'in-joke' here?

FireGarden
25th July 2003, 01:28 AM
Tariq Aziz was the eight of spades in the US deck of wanted Iraqis http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/24/sprj.irq.aziz.bio/

Lemmy did actually go through a period of singing "eight of spades" just to see if anyone would notice the difference.

They didn't..

Loki
25th July 2003, 03:08 AM
GoodPropaganda,

Tariq Aziz was the eight of spades in the US deck of wanted Iraqis
Ah....I suspected a joke, but didn't get the context. Thanks!

Lemmy did actually go through a period of singing "eight of spades" just to see if anyone would notice the difference.
In the same vein he has also used "The Face is Better Than The Snatch" on occasion! But that has no (obvious) reference to Islam, etc, so I probably didn't need to mention it. :D