View Full Version : Conservapedia Examined
Foster Zygote
28th March 2007, 02:05 PM
I don't know if this (http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2007/02/conservapedia.html) has been linked to before but it cracked me up. Check out the (currently) seventh comment from the top by 'anonymous'.
Miss Anthrope
28th March 2007, 02:07 PM
I do recall a thread about this a while back. Conservapedia is pure comedy.
Foster Zygote
28th March 2007, 02:51 PM
I do recall a thread about this a while back. Conservapedia is pure comedy.
I'd get more of a laugh out of the 'Law of Mass Conversation' if they weren't serious about it. At least Jon Swift's parody is gold.
Madalch
28th March 2007, 03:22 PM
I don't know if this (http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2007/02/conservapedia.html) has been linked to before but it cracked me up. Check out the (currently) seventh comment from the top by 'anonymous'.
While conservapedia was discussed, I don't think this blog was mentioned.
Also notice how many people point out an "error" which is obviously sarcasm.
Gregory
28th March 2007, 03:29 PM
Conservapedia is a work of art.
Raphael was a great painter who lived from 1482-1520. He painted The School of Athens, and greatly influenced Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci.
Raphael studied with the top student of Hamato Yoshi, who was known for his perfect technique.
Raphael wrote often as an art critic. Known for his (often racist) feuds, Raphael regularly made enemies in the art world. These include Ha'ntaan, Ch'rell, and Oroku Saki [1].
↑ Watkins, Theodore J. C., "Art Through History, Vol. 12: The Florentine School" Oxford University Press, 1924 (p. 534)
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/Raphael"
Apathia
28th March 2007, 09:16 PM
Raphael was a great painter who lived from 1482-1520. He painted The School of Athens, and greatly influenced Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci.
Raphael studied with the top student of Hamato Yoshi, who was known for his perfect technique.
Raphael wrote often as an art critic. Known for his (often racist) feuds, Raphael regularly made enemies in the art world. These include Ha'ntaan, Ch'rell, and Oroku Saki [1].
↑ Watkins, Theodore J. C., "Art Through History, Vol. 12: The Florentine School" Oxford University Press, 1924 (p. 534)
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/Raphael"
This sounds about fifth grade.
Axiom_Blade
28th March 2007, 09:52 PM
Hhhmmm. This is just great.
What if everybody who disagreed with Wikipedia just started their own wikipedia?
Just think...hippie wikipedia, neo-Nazi wikipedia, conspiracy wikipedia...
Kage
28th March 2007, 10:37 PM
This sounds about fifth grade.
Good christian homeschooled fifth grade that is.
Gregory
28th March 2007, 11:11 PM
This sounds about fifth grade.
If that's your only reaction, I think you're missing the real beauty of the article.
Madalch
28th March 2007, 11:16 PM
This sounds about fifth grade.
Most fifth graders know the difference between Raphael the painter and Raphael the Ninja Turtle.
Student of Hamoto Yoshi, indeed!
Apathia
28th March 2007, 11:18 PM
If that's your only reaction, I think you're missing the real beauty of the article. Not a Ninja Turtles fan, I take it?
You got me. I didn't see the Turtles in it.
(I'm a product of the '50s.)
I thought it was a real entry and worth a turtle's egg.
Hydrogen Cyanide
28th March 2007, 11:36 PM
Well, they kind of fixed the Stealth bomber article, except they have the wrong company:
http://www.conservapedia.com/B-2_Spirit
... which was developed by Northrop Grumman Corp... NOT Lockheed Martin.
Why do they get it so wrong when the information is so easily available at http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=82 ?
Hatchet
29th March 2007, 02:49 AM
Hhhmmm. This is just great.
What if everybody who disagreed with Wikipedia just started their own wikipedia?
Just think...hippie wikipedia, neo-Nazi wikipedia, conspiracy wikipedia...
Hippiepedia... I love it. Who wants to start one?
MaxHardcore
29th March 2007, 09:50 AM
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hippies&oldid=23711
those dirty hippies
JoeTheJuggler
29th March 2007, 10:08 AM
The one for child molesters would be pedophilpedia, and the one for doctors specializing in children would be pediapedia.
Then after there are hundred of "pedias" there would have to be one just about them--"wikipediapedia".
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.