PDA

View Full Version : 911 blogger today - WTC7

Panoply_Prefect
2nd April 2007, 03:27 PM
911 blogger today posts (http://www.911blogger.com/node/7471) a pic I havent seen before. Anyone see that picture (they are trying to make a case against the damage shown on a NIST wtc7 photo)?

I'd like to add to that, that you can see the damage from this pic as well:

http://judi.kw.nl/uploads/fok/wtc7-sw-corner2.jpg

EDIT: Looks like this is the original from which they draw their conlusions:

http://www.debunking911.com/wtcc.jpg

/S
Jaguar
2nd April 2007, 06:25 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.
e^n
2nd April 2007, 06:28 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.

Did you miss this? http: //judi.kw.nl/uploads/fok/wtc7-sw-corner2.jpg
T.A.M.
2nd April 2007, 06:29 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.

The photo may be fake, who knows. The damage was not. have you not seen the actual VIDEO FOOTAGE recently that shows the 20-30 storey gash?

TAM?
pomeroo
2nd April 2007, 06:34 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.



You tell 'em, Ace.
A W Smith
2nd April 2007, 09:03 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.

thats because they were answering it over on another thread

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=2484676&postcount=1721

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=2484676#post2484676
Pardalis
2nd April 2007, 09:19 PM
Jaguar, you haven't introduced yourself yet.

A simple "Hi" would have been nice.
DarkMagician
2nd April 2007, 09:21 PM
Why am I not surprised that no skeptics have replied to this thread? It is absolute proof that the photo of the damage was fake.

Hey, I don't need to do laundry. I just found some :socks:
LashL
2nd April 2007, 09:46 PM
Hey, I don't need to do laundry. I just found some :socks:

Indeed.

:socks: :socks: :socks: :socks: :socks: :socks: even
Unfit4Command
2nd April 2007, 10:18 PM
If you watch the video (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U) Factcheck showing fires and damage dealt to WTC 7, at 1:40 through the video you might be able to see the very top of the Southwest corner damage and it lines up with the NIST photo.

Look at the NIST photo and at the black window I circled with yellow, and a red arrow pointing to where the building appears to first be scooped out:
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t181/facebook99/damage1-2.jpg

Then look at the video screenshot with the same window circled, and a red arrow pointing to where the building first appears to be scooped out:
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t181/facebook99/damage2-2.jpg

It's not very clear, but it appears to show the beginnings of the damage a few floors down. Anyone else see it or am I just imagining things?
Panoply_Prefect
3rd April 2007, 02:03 AM
Im not 100%, who can be judging from unmarked internet photos, but the Zafar pic appears to be taken earlier than the NIST one. You can see that from the smoke on the top windows:

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u194/SLOB_2007/damage-comparison.gif


The original picture was taken by Aman Zafar, and is a scanned 35 mm picture published on his site:

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm

/S