PDA

View Full Version : Simple question for the twoofers....


Wartrac
3rd April 2007, 10:49 PM
I know this has more or less been gone over time and again. But there is just one thing I guess I don't understand......

If it has been proven that 9/11 was an inside job and been proven with science......why is there more than one theroy? I mean I hear "we have experts etc etc". Well then why is there multiple groups with their own ideas......if we are talking physics and science.....how can there be more than one "truth"?

I would like to see one fact on any dubious claim that 9/11 was an inside job.....just one. I mean if you people can't agree amoungst yourselves lol.......there really isn't much hope is there?

I know the answer to this.... so it's semi-rhetorical I just wonder if any twoofers know the answer to this......and woo calling something woo isn't going to fly or using the "fringe" answer.

If it isn't people pushing their own ideas to sell more books/dvds than the next guy......tell my why your "experts and scientists" can't agree on one theroy.....I guess that's cause that's all that it is.....unfounded and baseless speculation.

And if you back out with "we never said it was proven we just want another investigation".....stop.......because you need evidence to reopen an investigation. Not to mention almost all twoofers use the "WTC7 is enough evidence to know it's an inside job". So stop backpeddling, stand up to the bar and present your case with facts. No quote mining, no speculation...........you're all about 12 miniutes into your 15.

CHF
3rd April 2007, 11:11 PM
Yeah they do seem to have a fair bit of trouble coming to any sort of agreement, don't they?

But the reason for that is simple: every twoofer thinks their truth is the real truth and that everyone else is "disinfo."

In other words the government has apparently hired a *&#% load of disinfo agents!

The only twoofer who isn't an agent? Bob from Nebraska. He figured it all out.

westprog
4th April 2007, 02:54 AM
Yeah they do seem to have a fair bit of trouble coming to any sort of agreement, don't they?

But the reason for that is simple: every twoofer thinks their truth is the real truth and that everyone else is "disinfo."

In other words the government has apparently hired a *&#% load of disinfo agents!

The only twoofer who isn't an agent? Bob from Nebraska. He figured it all out.

There's nothing inherently wrong with having different interpretations of the evidence. The weird thing is that they can differ totally about what the evidence is, and still think they have a coherent theory.

For example - they have the sound of explosions - but they also have the molten steel. This requires two seperate explanations - thermite or bombs - but they never clarify which they think actually happened.

Because it it were bombs, then there's no explanation for the molten steel. If it were thermite, then there's no explanation for the explosions. So if one of the anomalies has to be spurious, why not both?

(To be fair, Scooby has proposed the thermite+bomb theory. But that's not the mainstream approach, if there is such a thing).

The Great Hairy One
4th April 2007, 03:01 AM
Don't you think that this fact would be a clue to these guys?

Let's hypothesize that it actually was an inside job, and WTC7 was brought down by as CD event. Then surely:

1) The truth should be consistent, and
2) The evidence should lead to the same conclusions

So, rather than the huge number of different theories put forward by every single CTer, we should see a single, coherent theory which is supported by whatever evidence these guys are using.

Rather, it seems that the CT movement as a whole can not agree on a single theory. They all argue their own personal theories with each other with just as much vehemence as they argue with us skeptics. And they don't seem to be able to convince anyone else about how 'true' their own personal theory is.

Cheers,
TGHO