Wartrac
3rd April 2007, 10:49 PM
I know this has more or less been gone over time and again. But there is just one thing I guess I don't understand......
If it has been proven that 9/11 was an inside job and been proven with science......why is there more than one theroy? I mean I hear "we have experts etc etc". Well then why is there multiple groups with their own ideas......if we are talking physics and science.....how can there be more than one "truth"?
I would like to see one fact on any dubious claim that 9/11 was an inside job.....just one. I mean if you people can't agree amoungst yourselves lol.......there really isn't much hope is there?
I know the answer to this.... so it's semi-rhetorical I just wonder if any twoofers know the answer to this......and woo calling something woo isn't going to fly or using the "fringe" answer.
If it isn't people pushing their own ideas to sell more books/dvds than the next guy......tell my why your "experts and scientists" can't agree on one theroy.....I guess that's cause that's all that it is.....unfounded and baseless speculation.
And if you back out with "we never said it was proven we just want another investigation".....stop.......because you need evidence to reopen an investigation. Not to mention almost all twoofers use the "WTC7 is enough evidence to know it's an inside job". So stop backpeddling, stand up to the bar and present your case with facts. No quote mining, no speculation...........you're all about 12 miniutes into your 15.
If it has been proven that 9/11 was an inside job and been proven with science......why is there more than one theroy? I mean I hear "we have experts etc etc". Well then why is there multiple groups with their own ideas......if we are talking physics and science.....how can there be more than one "truth"?
I would like to see one fact on any dubious claim that 9/11 was an inside job.....just one. I mean if you people can't agree amoungst yourselves lol.......there really isn't much hope is there?
I know the answer to this.... so it's semi-rhetorical I just wonder if any twoofers know the answer to this......and woo calling something woo isn't going to fly or using the "fringe" answer.
If it isn't people pushing their own ideas to sell more books/dvds than the next guy......tell my why your "experts and scientists" can't agree on one theroy.....I guess that's cause that's all that it is.....unfounded and baseless speculation.
And if you back out with "we never said it was proven we just want another investigation".....stop.......because you need evidence to reopen an investigation. Not to mention almost all twoofers use the "WTC7 is enough evidence to know it's an inside job". So stop backpeddling, stand up to the bar and present your case with facts. No quote mining, no speculation...........you're all about 12 miniutes into your 15.