Crockett Grabbe and why Nist & Garcia are wrong

[Redtail]

A truther posted this (On a Harley Davidson forum oddly enough)

http://innworldreport.net/video_launcher.php?2007-04-23i

Has anyone heard of this guy before?

ETA: I did a search here but I didn't find anything on him.

[Gravy]

Crockett Grabbe is a name for the ages. But "collapsed in less than seven seconds" is a statement unworthy of that name.

[Alt+F4]

Has anyone heard of this guy before?

He seems to believe that WTC 1 & 2 were brought down by explosives planted by Islamic terrorists themselves well before 9/11:

However, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a different conclusion: this collapse was in fact caused by explosive devices planted well in advance - explosives just waiting there to be triggered by the heat of the airplanes crashing into the towers to result in their collapse.
Terrorists were likely bringing those explosives in over a period of time, sealing and hiding them at convenient locations that could not be spotted. These probably included sealing them inside concrete and metallic structures, where they would not be detected for a long time.
Having cells of terrorists working to hide these explosives over time is quite consistent with their methodical development of the plans of terror through meticulously studying plane flights and by learning to fly airplanes over time. Their failed effort to destroy the towers in 1993 showed them the importance of having the explosives strategically placed. Their intent all these years was the same as they described in the 1993 attack: to knock down and destroy the twin towers.
Linky: http://www.sealane.org/

[CurtC]

Obviously, he's disinfo.

[The Doc]

There is no way anyone could have planted enough explosives to bring those buildings down completely unnoticed. It's just not possible.

[Brainster]

Sander Hicks (The Big Wedding) used to do interviews for INN World Report.

[gumboot]

A common misconception this guy presents is that Al Qaeda were behind the 1993 WTC bombing. They weren't. 9/11 was the first time Al Qaeda attacked domestic or civilian US targets.

-Gumboot

[beachnut]

My Perturbation analysis, -

The dumbest show, with the dumbest expert, and to top it off they cite Rosie. Makes this the top dumb news cast for the ages. He even shows fires burning all over the building, not being fought? Exclusive photos of fires not fought; he missed the real story to expose these idiots, who come with no calculations, no proof of melted/vaporized steel, no proof of tons of molten metal, and no proof of squibs.

Big lines -
"Steel to melt and vaporize"
"the amount of melting steel were massive"
"Steven Jones make a lot of sense"
"molten metal"
"evaporated steel"

[Aggs]

Big lines -
"Steel to melt and vaporize"
"the amount of melting steel were massive"
"Steven Jones make a lot of sense"
"molten metal"
"evaporated steel"

My favorites:

"like the building would have turned into liquid water" (if it turned into ice, then I would be suspicious)
"energy and momentum would not allow you to get a collapse in 7 seconds" (have energy and momentum been determined to actually be inhibitors of velocity?)
"let's consider wtc1...it was hit by a plane, but the plane almost missed the building" (and thus, the buildings almost didn't fall)
"I've talked about the evidence of these squibs, suggesting that the building actually exploded" (yesterday squibs meant implosion, what will tomorrow bring?)
"there is evidence of evaporated steel" (it's kind of wispy and smells like cherry incense)

I'm sure he's well respected and incredibly intelligent, too bad we lost him to the dark side...

[Spindrift]

"Evaporated Steel" - sounds like a 60's acid rock band.

ETA: Or an impotent porn star.