CIT claims AA77 remotely piloted into Pentagon

[Bobert]

On the Jeff Rense Show Craig Ranke (Lyte Trip) claims that AA77 was was not "moved" by a "human".

He seemed to be implying that the plane was under some sort of remote piloting.

I am no expert in the ability to remote pilot a plane but I thought that I read once where Boeing indicated that this was impossible.

I am hoping that Craig will address his claims and maybe provide evidence, witnesses etc to his claims.

[Bobert]

I stand corrected on one point....
He didnt specifically say into the pentagon but rather that no human was controlling AA77

[Minadin]

To be fair, he could possibly be referring to Reptilian Overlords, Vulcans, Asgaard, Jedi Master Yoda, or any number of things, in addition to remote control piloting via computer.

[rwguinn]

To be fair, he could possibly be referring to Reptilian Overlords, Vulcans, Asgaard, Jedi Master Yoda, or any number of things, in addition to remote control piloting via computer.
To be absolutely correct, you are right.
Even computer-control requires a human hand behind it.
Therefore, aliens from "Out there" were responsible for 9/11

[Darth Rotor]

To be absolutely correct, you are right.
Even computer-control requires a human hand behind it.
Therefore, aliens from "Out there" were responsible for 9/11
Or, AA77 was flown remotely by the NWO operative sitting at the Citgo station, who was manipulating the joystick on the remote control, a sophisticated control package that had been suppeptitiously attached to the flight control computer of AA77. :rolleyes: Poor Captain Burlingame was unable to simply disconnect/disable the flight controls using the pickle switch, or by pulling a circuit breaker, and was not strong enough to overcome the control movements with his hands.

Do these people have any clue?

No.

DR

[Bobert]

WOW
Some people will claim ANYTHING to make a buck.

[uk_dave]

To be fair, he could possibly be referring to Reptilian Overlords, Vulcans, Asgaard, Jedi Master Yoda, or any number of things, in addition to remote control piloting via computer.

I think lyte would prefer Reptilian Overlords, Vulcans, Asgaard, Jedi Master Yoda, or any number of things, so long as it isn't remote control.

That's Russell Pickerings pet theory....and they, you know, like, aren't talkin' right now

[Myriad]

Since CIT also claims that AA77 flew over the Pentagon rather than crashing into it, what reason is there to believe that the plane was remotely piloted? I don't mean what evidence is there, I know there's none, but what would the advantage of remote piloting be for the evil genius conspirators?

if the plan were to really crash the plane into a building. then remote piloting, if it were physically possible, would at least make sense conceptually. NWO pilots capable of pulling off high-speed high-precision maneuvers in a jetliner a few meters from a building don't exactly grow on trees, after all. But...

It occurs to me that I've seen similar confusion in people who are trying to invent explanations for magic tricks they've seen. Several unsatisfactory and mutually incompatible partial explanations somehow add up to one sufficient explanation.

"He can't really be sawing the woman in half, the saw must be fake."

"Okay, but a fake saw can't explain how he..."

"And he gives her a bunch of antibiotics and painkillers first."

"But if it's a fake saw, why would he need..."

"And the woman is really a robot."

"Uh, yeah. There's just no fooling you, is there?"

Respectfully,
Myriad

[Bobert]

Well Lyte does not appear as if he is going to address this.