Troops in Iraq face Pay-Cut

[svero]

This should go a long way to boosting moral.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/14/MN94780.DTL

"Washington -- The Pentagon wants to cut the pay of its 148,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, who are already contending with guerrilla-style attacks, homesickness and 120- degree-plus heat.

Unless Congress and President Bush take quick action when Congress returns after Labor Day, the uniformed Americans in Iraq and the 9,000 in Afghanistan will lose a pay increase approved last April of $75 a month in "imminent danger pay" and $150 a month in "family separation allowances.""

[Malachi151]

Originally posted by svero
This should go a long way to boosting moral.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/14/MN94780.DTL

"Washington -- The Pentagon wants to cut the pay of its 148,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, who are already contending with guerrilla-style attacks, homesickness and 120- degree-plus heat.

Unless Congress and President Bush take quick action when Congress returns after Labor Day, the uniformed Americans in Iraq and the 9,000 in Afghanistan will lose a pay increase approved last April of $75 a month in "imminent danger pay" and $150 a month in "family separation allowances.""

LOL, sounds like a setup for Bush to come in the "save the day" for the troops :rolleyes:

[svero]

Heh... well that didn't last too long :-)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2003/08/15/PAY.TMP

"Washington -- The White House quickly backpedaled Thursday on Pentagon plans to cut the combat pay of the 157,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan after disclosure of the idea quickly became a political embarrassment.

The Pentagon's support for the idea of rolling back "imminent danger pay" by $75 a month and "family separation allowances" for the American forces by $150 a month collapsed after a story in some editions of The Chronicle Thursday generated intense criticism from military families, veterans groups and Democratic candidates seeking to unseat President Bush in 2004. "

So now suddenly there is the budget for it? How about that! I guess I just don't get economics...

[Malachi151]

Originally posted by svero
Heh... well that didn't last too long :-)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2003/08/15/PAY.TMP

"Washington -- The White House quickly backpedaled Thursday on Pentagon plans to cut the combat pay of the 157,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan after disclosure of the idea quickly became a political embarrassment.

The Pentagon's support for the idea of rolling back "imminent danger pay" by $75 a month and "family separation allowances" for the American forces by $150 a month collapsed after a story in some editions of The Chronicle Thursday generated intense criticism from military families, veterans groups and Democratic candidates seeking to unseat President Bush in 2004. "

So now suddenly there is the budget for it? How about that! I guess I just don't get economics...

We all know the liberal press hates the military... ;)

(Will miltary people thank the press for saving their ass now?)

[American]

Originally posted by Malachi151

Will miltary people thank the press for saving their ass now?


There should be a draft. Because of you alone, we should all suffer a burden for your stupidity.

[Mr Manifesto]

Originally posted by American



There should be a draft. Because of you alone, we should all suffer a burden for your stupidity.
Oh American, now what are you crapping on about this time. I swear your mother should smack some hush into you.