PDA

View Full Version : I cannot dispute it. WTC1 collapse was controlled.


cloudshipsrule
20th June 2007, 05:18 AM
In fact WTC1, 2 and 7 were all controlled collapses....

Controlled by the laws of physics.

Factors which contributed to the mechanism, initiation and manner of these collapses include the actual design of the buildings, the damage sustained from plane impacts and fire temperatures. Not to mention the fact that gravity was 100% functional that particular day.

Yup, controlled collapses! :D

Dave Rogers
20th June 2007, 05:28 AM
No, no, no. WFC1, 2 and 3 were the controls. WFC1 and 2 weren't hit by planes, and WFC3 wasn't hit by parts of WFC1. None of them collapsed. A perfect control sample.

Dave

MG1962
20th June 2007, 05:34 AM
In fact WTC1, 2 and 7 were all controlled collapses....

Controlled by the laws of physics.

Factors which contributed to the mechanism, initiation and manner of these collapses include the actual design of the buildings, the damage sustained from plane impacts and fire temperatures. Not to mention the fact that gravity was 100% functional that particular day.

Yup, controlled collapses! :biggrin:


So what are you saying here. Gravity was following it's handlers instructions that day????

Dave Rogers
20th June 2007, 05:46 AM
So what are you saying here. Gravity was following it's handlers instructions that day????

Undoubtedly. But who was gravity's handler? Who were the real culprits?

Is it just a coincidence that "Gravity Handler" is an anagram of "Gravy and Hitler"?

Dave

Architect
20th June 2007, 09:19 AM
No more than Danzig is an anagram of Gdansk.

CurtC
20th June 2007, 02:04 PM
Is it just a coincidence that "Gravity Handler" is an anagram of "Gravy and Hitler"?
Hmmm, your ideas intrigue me and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

shuize
20th June 2007, 02:57 PM
Since we're making confessions:

I, too, must confess. I recently met a truther in person. After asking him (repeatedly) if it bothered him that so few in the scientific community supported his views of how the towers collapsed, he angrily insisted that there were "many" who did. So I asked him to give me his best "expert" in the field who could explain in scientific terms how it was in fact a controlled demolition. He mentioned Judy Wood. Now, I remember hearing that name kicked around but I couldn't exactly place her with her theory, so after I got home I did a quick internet search.

Ladies and gentlemen, laser beams from space. It's so obvious. How could any of us have missed it?

Part of me is giddy from laughter. And, yet, another part of me is sad to think that someone I've met in person could believe something so retarded. I mean, really, after investing so much of himself in the truth movement, and willingly accusing the U.S. government of the murder of 3,000 fellow citizens, it all hinges on this? His best "expert" opinion says laser beams from space? How pathetic.

chippy
20th June 2007, 03:49 PM
Undoubtedly. But who was gravity's handler? Who were the real culprits?

Is it just a coincidence that "Gravity Handler" is an anagram of "Gravy and Hitler"?

Dave

Yeah, well, Dave Rogers is an anagram of "sad ogre rev". So there!