PDA

View Full Version : Valid research or disrepectful speculation?


stateofgrace
21st June 2007, 02:27 AM
I have decide to satrt this thread becuase of these commnets by Lyte


Where did I say anything about voice morphing? Maybe that technology was used in some cases or maybe it wasn't. Most of the conversations were brief and not interactive. Some could have been pre-recorded.

As far as the passengers go........most are probably pure victims while some might even be fabricated identities (do you know anyone that has heavily researched them all and their backgrounds?), some may be expendable patsies or dupes, while others completely complicit operatives for control. We can not rule out the possibility that a few of the family members were involved.

I am not accusing anyone specific and they may have all been victims.

Perhaps it offends people for me to speculate that but bottom line if 9/11 was an inside job we will never know the full situation with all the passengers and it HAD to involve a significant amount of operatives whether or not the passengers are all innocent victims.



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11107&st=50

It would be easy to get annoyed by these remarks and simply hurl a load of insults at this individual, but in the interests of fair and impartial debate, I have decided not to. I feel it is only fair and correct that Lytes speculative remarks be addressed.

So Lyte, which families have you got doubts about?

Can you be more specific when you say you cannot rule out the possibility that a few of the families were involved in the murder of their loved ones?

Which victims could be considered to be expendable patsies?

Which victims were fabricated, had fake identities?

I am asking this to give you Lyte, a platform to show how you figure you are after to justice for the families when you suspect that some of them could be involved in the murder of their loved ones.

The platform is yours Lyte and any other conspiracy theories who likes to speculate about this. Do any other cter agree with Lyte?

Do your theories fall apart unless the victims and families are involved?

How does this form of speculation in anyway further your agenda and win the hearts and minds of those that do not believe you?

Maybe a cter could or Lyte can tell me exactly why there is any need to extensively research those that got caught up in this terrible event.

Is this really valid research or disrespectful speculation?

uk_dave
21st June 2007, 02:36 AM
It's a lack of empathy with the families of the victims: 'They're not people, they're pawns to be used to bolster my paranoid fantasies.'

Lyte believes he has the smoking gun which proves the official account to be a fabrication.
Therefore the official account about all of the events on 911 must be a fabrication.
Therefore the telephone calls made by the victims to their families must be fabricated.
Therefore he feels justified in questioning the validity of those victims and their families.

I wonder if it works the other way round?
Would Lyte accept that his smoking gun is false if the telephone conversations can be proved to be true?

Somehow I doubt it.