PDA

View Full Version : Why People Believe Weird Things


Kahalachan
22nd July 2007, 05:49 PM
Shermer prefaces Why People Believe Weird Things with a brief anecdotal tour of his pseudoscientific and mystic encounters along with an introduction of what his book will entail. Science and skepticism is defined, not as an object, but as a process of discovering provisional and tentative truth. Science and pseudoscience is contrasted by their methods of change and manner in which ideas are supported. Ubiquitous logical fallacies and problems in pseudoscience are presented and defined.

Pseudoscientific concepts and superstitions are exposed as products of natural phenomena, chance, group think, and dogmatism. Near death experiences, alien encounters, and cult-like behavior are among the issues explored. The evolution and Creation controversy is given attention, not as scientific rivals, but as different modalities in supporting conclusions. The remarkable paralells drawn between Creationism and holocaust denial offer an avenue for a transition to the next section of the book.

Shermer investigates holocaust denial and describes the differences between history and pseudohistory. Photographic and documental evidence is provided within the book to serve as powerful evidence, in conjunction with the historical narratives and statistics, to support the notion that the holocaust happened as reported. Shermer's book closes with a discussion on how even highly intelligent individuals can still fall prey to irrational thinking; yet he provides an optimistic conclusion that hope can be channeled with reason to provide a better future.


One of the main strengths of Why People Believe Weird Things is that it can be digested by a wide audience, spanning from the layperson to the scholar. Shermer clears up misunderstandings concerning the naive opinions about science and history, as well as the misconceptions skeptics may possess about proponents for pseudoscientific and pseudohistoric claims. His non-confrontational but intellectually honest approach to many of these issues is likely to appeal to both the skeptic and believer. The book's greatest strength lies in the unbiased and rational assessment of differing convictions.

Conversely, the book's greatest weakness is that it primarily answers the "what" and not the "why" of weird beliefs, with the exception of the beginning and the end. An initial glance at the title might presuppose one to assume that a comprehensive psychological or sociological evaluation will be presented, when this is not the case. Shermer provides sufficient, but not an in depth, analysis of why people believe in weird things. Depending on one's expectations, this book may fall within the range of moderate to excellent.

Overall, one would be remised if they did not read this book and gain from its enlightening and informative content. I consider Why People Believe Weird Things to be such a triumph, that it is the closest possible text to serve as a skeptic's manual.


<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=thejamesrandi-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0805070893&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&lc1=AF0717&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr&nou=1" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>

canadarocks
23rd August 2007, 02:35 PM
Reading this book got me into visiting web-sites like this one to learn about debunking the paranormal. I thought it was well written and I enjoyed it.

Elizabeth I
9th September 2007, 04:05 PM
This book was an enjoyable read, but I thought a better title would have been The Weird Things People Believe. I didn't think Shermer did a very good job of investigating or explaining the why of their beliefs.

letsthink
4th December 2007, 10:00 AM
People have mentioned the fact that "why" people believe weird things is not answered.

The best book I have read lately that discusses the "why" question is Mistakes were Made (But not by Me).

tomwaits
6th December 2007, 02:20 AM
I enjoyed the part about Holocaust Denial. I thought he really did an objective account of the inaccuracies and paradox within the community. It wasn't just a "they're a bunch of jew-hating nazis"-type critique. He pointed out how David Irving could easily interact with jews with no prejudice, yet harbor a bizarre suspicion towards "THE JEWS" as a collective group...and Irving didn't seem to find this strange at all. Great book.

Cincinnatus
4th March 2008, 02:11 AM
I think i'm going to check this book out shortly.

GreyICE
17th March 2008, 06:05 PM
Amazing book. Its interesting how he gives the various woos in the book a reasonably fair hearing. He never tries to paint them in a negative light, he just discusses their words, and lets them fall on their own merits (sometimes he even seems to feel sorry for them).

byrrha
3rd May 2008, 08:25 PM
This is one book of very few that I've felt the need to read twice. It's concise, entertaining, and doesn't have a mean spirit that I'm finding increasingly prevelant in newer books which discuss various 'belief' systems.

Skeptiger
16th June 2008, 07:24 AM
I really enjoyed this book, it was thoroughly researched and really well written. I particularly liked the aspects of being skeptical of the skeptics, particularly the Holocaust deniers. Shermer was really balanced in his discussion.