PDA

View Full Version : What caused the 47 intertwined core collums of the wtc buildings to collapse?


Pages : 1 [2]

cloudshipsrule
8th August 2007, 08:33 PM
Please explain.

F=M*A

Mince
8th August 2007, 08:47 PM
Mince, you said that I look like Johnny Depp on my Dylan Avery thread?

Interesting! :D


Yeah, that picture in the upper right of the page is spot on.


ETA: (Ack! You've removed your picture that was in the upper right)

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=192142566

JimBenArm
8th August 2007, 08:50 PM
still waiting for an answer that isnt bogus, which as well all know is impossible.

here is a picture...

http://physics911.net/images/9-11%20Picture6.jpg
Good job! You can recognize a picture now! I see the schooling is paying off. Maybe you can advance to the more complicated concepts, like gravity, next.

JimBenArm
8th August 2007, 08:53 PM
Ah the old standby, accuse new poster of being a sock. I can personally vouch that he isn't. He knows me and RedIbis and we wanted him to join to get a fairer balance on this forum.
Ah, just like on your forum! Yes, of course, where reasoned discourse is encouraged and allowed.

Oh, wait, that's where everyone who doesn't agree completely with you is immediately expelled, just like happened to you here.

Wait, no, that didn't happen. Well, hmm. Don't know that you have a real point there. Sorry, try again.

Pardalis
8th August 2007, 08:57 PM
Maybe you can advance to the more complicated concepts, like gravity, next.

He'll get around to that concept sooner or later, it's part of his learning process.

1LAb9enZz5g

Mince
8th August 2007, 08:58 PM
F=M*A


Hmmmm.

F=M*A

FEMA


I suppose this is just another "coincidence".

CptColumbo
8th August 2007, 09:00 PM
He'll get around to that concept sooner or later, it's part of his learning process.

1LAb9enZz5gLet me be the first to say, "ow."

cloudshipsrule
8th August 2007, 09:03 PM
F=m*a

Fema

Aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

CptColumbo
8th August 2007, 09:08 PM
Ah the old standby, accuse new poster of being a sock. I can personally vouch that he isn't. He knows me and RedIbis and we wanted him to join to get a fairer balance on this forum.

Ah, just like on your forum! Yes, of course, where reasoned discourse is encouraged and allowed.

Oh, wait, that's where everyone who doesn't agree completely with you is immediately expelled, just like happened to you here.

Wait, no, that didn't happen. Well, hmm. Don't know that you have a real point there. Sorry, try again.

Just remember, honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.

PhantomWolf
8th August 2007, 09:12 PM
the official explanations are botched, and there was explosives, and you guys cannot explain it without defying physics,

and even defying as you have many times the actual fema, and 9/11 commission reports.

you guys are not open minded enough to discuss this with

Hang on..... The offical reports were botched, but when when we point out an error in them that FatesWebb claims is true (dispite the fact a stopwatch would prove him wrong there too,) we aren't being open minded????? So if we disagree with a government report when Fates agrees with it, we're wrong, and if we agree with a government report when Fates disagrees with it we're wrong. Hmmm, seems to me that it's just that we disagree with Fates....

9/11 Chewy Defense
8th August 2007, 09:15 PM
Yeah, that picture in the upper right of the page is spot on.


ETA: (Ack! You've removed your picture that was in the upper right)

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=192142566


I actually made it a little better. The layout from the orignial kind of got messed up. I put in a new one!

Elizabeth I
8th August 2007, 09:29 PM
collums?

Precious.

Well, I have to admit that was my first thought, too. We hates Bagginses, we does, gollum.

(You're pretty cute too.)

What caused the 47 intertwined core collums of the wtc buildings to collapse?

Bombs.

Evidence?

Explosions.

Evidence?

Earwitnesses.

I say again, collums?

Corsair 115
8th August 2007, 10:45 PM
Because Belgium, Norway, Japan and New Zealand are insidious members of the New World Order of course.It’s PrisonPlanet, not PrisonCountry!


Perhaps, but I'd really like to hear their explanations in their own words.

PhantomWolf
8th August 2007, 10:48 PM
Because Belgium, Norway, Japan and New Zealand are insidious members of the New World Order of course.

We are? I thought that we were well known for our Anti-Americanism (No Nukes, Free Trade, No Support for Iraq, and Keith Loche). It's Australia that's part of the NWO.

jaydeehess
9th August 2007, 06:00 AM
The first rule of intelligence: You aren't as much as you think you are.

In the normal course of development one has proved this to one's self by surviving what one recognizes as completely bone-head thoughts and actions that one experienced in the first 25-30 years of existance.

Occassionally though a person does not experience this learning pattern and continues with bone-head thoughts and/or actions sometimes into old age.

mortimer
9th August 2007, 07:23 AM
Heh, I was only looking for names of real people. That is clearly a made up name! :p

Oh, you mean like Sillius Soddus, or Biggus Dickus?

FramerDave
9th August 2007, 10:13 AM
One of the people on the list was actually a WTC victim. I wonder what their explaination for that is.

Come on now. I am so tired of victim hood automatically conferring expert knowledge. Ok, so they were in the WTC. How exactly does that give them the knowledge of structural engineering to understand how the collapse occurred and why? Does victim status give them some omniscient power allowing them to see and hear everything that happened that day?

Are all the Katrina victims now qualified as meteorologists?

jaydeehess
9th August 2007, 10:28 AM
We are? I thought that we were well known for our Anti-Americanism (No Nukes, Free Trade, No Support for Iraq, and Keith Loche). It's Australia that's part of the NWO.

Another ploy to divert suspicion. I also notice that no large bridges have collapsed, and no large buildings have collapsed in NZ. In fact New Zealand is rarely even in the news. It is therefore quite obvious that the NWO world headquaters is actually in the mountains of New Zealand.

That makes Australia your Bit(rule 8)

jaydeehess
9th August 2007, 10:30 AM
Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

The world IS a loaded gun, and they're pointing it at me!

jujigatami
9th August 2007, 10:31 AM
Come on now. I am so tired of victim hood automatically conferring expert knowledge. Ok, so they were in the WTC. How exactly does that give them the knowledge of structural engineering to understand how the collapse occurred and why? Does victim status give them some omniscient power allowing them to see and hear everything that happened that day?

Are all the Katrina victims now qualified as meteorologists?

Uh, Dave,

I think he meant that one of the names on the list DIED in the WTC on 9/11.

At least thats how I took it.

FramerDave
9th August 2007, 10:32 AM
Uh, Dave,

I think he meant that one of the names on the list DIED in the WTC on 9/11.

At least thats how I took it.

If so, I stand corrected and admit my mistake. However my sentiments still stand.

Alferd_Packer
9th August 2007, 11:04 AM
I say again, collums?

It's all part of Judy the elf's "Space Bean Theory."

FatesWebb
9th August 2007, 12:25 PM
Aloha and Mahalo Nui Loa

anytime you see someone with 808 in their name, you can bet they originated or are from hawaii. 808 is the area code of Hawaii.

here is another person saying they were blown down the block by the blast... for which I have been called a liar for saying in this thread that this happened to someone else. here is a video with a hero also making the same claim, so this hero is lying?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7471885217846396761

RedIbis
9th August 2007, 12:28 PM
here is another person saying they were blown down the block by the blast... for which I have been called a liar for saying in this thread that this happened to someone else. here is a video with a hero also making the same claim, so this hero is lying?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7471885217846396761

Apparently, around here, the word "lie" is used for anything that does not conform to the official story.

Also, anyone who presents info which contradicts the official is referred to as a "liar."

Other than that, I still haven't been told what a "stundie" is, but when I get the explanation I'm sure it will produce a very healthy dose of nerdchills. The slang around here is often tedious and juvenile.

pomeroo
9th August 2007, 12:30 PM
here is another person saying they were blown down the block by the blast... for which I have been called a liar for saying in this thread that this happened to someone else. here is a video with a hero also making the same claim, so this hero is lying?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7471885217846396761


Just wondering: The overwhelming majority of first-responders despise conspiracy liars. Are those firefighters and rescue-workers also "heroes"?

Pardalis
9th August 2007, 12:30 PM
Apparently, around here, the word "lie" is used for anything that does not conform to the official story.

Also, anyone who presents info which contradicts the official is referred to as a "liar."


No, a liar is someone who continues to present the same false information even though they know it has been debunked many times.

See the difference?

Hokulele
9th August 2007, 12:33 PM
here is another person saying they were blown down the block by the blast... for which I have been called a liar for saying in this thread that this happened to someone else. here is a video with a hero also making the same claim, so this hero is lying?


Please give the time mark in this video where this person claims to have been blown for "blocks" by a "pyroclastic flow" as this was your original claim. I have already agreed that some people were blown a few feet by wind from the collapse.

chillzero
9th August 2007, 01:56 PM
Stop the bickering and personal taunts, or the thread gets moderated, or binned to AAH

FatesWebb
9th August 2007, 02:29 PM
Apparently, around here, the word "lie" is used for anything that does not conform to the official story.

Also, anyone who presents info which contradicts the official is referred to as a "liar."

Other than that, I still haven't been told what a "stundie" is, but when I get the explanation I'm sure it will produce a very healthy dose of nerdchills. The slang around here is often tedious and juvenile.

from what I am getting a stundie is a idiotic comment made in a post, for which they have a contest... if someone mentions stundie in relation to you it is a insult I believe

FatesWebb
9th August 2007, 02:30 PM
Please give the time mark in this video where this person claims to have been blown for "blocks" by a "pyroclastic flow" as this was your original claim. I have already agreed that some people were blown a few feet by wind from the collapse.

it is in the video torwards the end, it is also in another video called 9/11 mysteries

RedIbis
9th August 2007, 02:32 PM
from what I am getting a stundie is a idiotic comment made in a post, for which they have a contest... if someone mentions stundie in relation to you it is a insult I believe

Have you discerned the derivation of this curious epithet?

Hokulele
9th August 2007, 02:38 PM
it is in the video torwards the end, it is also in another video called 9/11 mysteries


Do you know the exact time mark? It is a 49 minute video, and I don't care to sit all the way through the whole thing. Ditto for 9/11 Mysteries. My husband tried to watch that one, and gave up in disgust. I generally try to trust his judgement. :)

Regnad Kcin
9th August 2007, 03:28 PM
Apparently, around here, the word "lie" is used for anything that does not conform to the official story.

Also, anyone who presents info which contradicts the official is referred to as a "liar."

Other than that, I still haven't been told what a "stundie" is, but when I get the explanation I'm sure it will produce a very healthy dose of nerdchills. The slang around here is often tedious and juvenile.Still no evidence of an "inside job," eh? How sad for you.

jaydeehess
9th August 2007, 03:46 PM
Have you discerned the derivation of this curious epithet?

Come now, you can't venture a guess?

Someone makes a comment say like Killtown's adding two different quantities and coming up with a third (IIRC he added a length and a velocity and got a velocity) that illustrates a complete and utter lack of mathematical knowledge. Such a person is often refered to as being "stunned" and therefore the remark is a "Stundie".

At least that is how I understand it.

We also have another poster who seems to have claimed that air pressure is responsible for producing the effect of gravity, though he so far refuses to verify what he meant by the remark.

"Pyroclastic flow" as a description of the dust cloud emanating from the collapses of the towers is also so far away from reality that it deserves to be in the running for a 'Stundie'.