PDA

View Full Version : Interview with psychiatrist who evaluated Jose Padilla


kalen
16th August 2007, 10:56 AM
A psychiatrist that evaluated Jose Padilla's fitness to stand trial is interviewed (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/16/1416242) on Democracy Now.


DR. ANGELA HEGARTY: What happened at the brig was essentially the destruction of a human being's mind. That’s what happened at the brig. His personality was deconstructed and reformed.


And essentially, like many abuse victims, whether it’s torture survivors or battered women or even children who are abused by parents, as long as the parents or the abuser is in control in their minds, essentially they identify with the primary aims of the abuser. And all abusers, whoever they are, have one absolute requirement, and that is that you keep their secret. I mean, it’s common knowledge that people who abuse children or women will say, “Look at what you made me do,” putting the blame on the victim, trying to instill guilt. “People will judge you. People will think you’re crazy if you tell them about this. You will be an enemy. You will be seen as an enemy. You will be seen as a bad person if this comes out. There will be dire and terrible consequences, not only for you.” Jose was very, very concerned that if torture allegations were made on his behalf, that somehow it would it interfere with the government's ability to detain people at Guantanamo, and this was something he couldn't sign onto. He was very identified with the goals of the government.
Not surprising, since this is exactly what they wanted to do to him.



... a quote in the Jacoby declaration (http://www.pegc.us/archive/Padilla_vs_Rumsfeld/Jacoby_declaration_20030109.pdf) that caught my attention as a forensic psychiatrist. And that -- essentially it says that the purpose of keeping Mr. Padilla isolated was to foster a sense of dependence on his interrogators and to essentially foreclose in his mind utterly any hope of rescue. And it makes reference to the fact that, given that people who have had contact with the criminal justice system will expect to see an attorney and be rescued by an attorney, they want to essentially disabuse him of the notion that he will ever be rescued. They want him to believe that he is in their power forever. And I believe, in a sense, they succeeded.

Darth Rotor
16th August 2007, 02:29 PM
A psychiatrist that evaluated Jose Padilla's fitness to stand trial is interviewed (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/16/1416242) on Democracy Now.


Not surprising, since this is exactly what they wanted to do to him.
Funny, Everett Alvarez didn't have that problem. He was isolated, abused, and treated most heinously, but he managed to keep his stuff together.

Was this Padilla guy some kind of a wimp, or is this doctor playing a political card? Hard to say.

"Was essentially." That's a flag.

This psychiatrist plays the child victim gambit, but then, if she hadn't, I doubt Democracy Now would have printed her remarks. I smell a Bonfire of the Vanities honor student ploy here.

On the other hand, there some fouls with the way some of the people taken in the early part of the WoT have been handled in general. No glory.

I smell a Bonfire of the Vanities honor student ploy here.

DR