headscratcher4
29th August 2007, 11:10 AM
Ok, Helmsley wasn't the most warm and fuzzy person...but she did go to jail and paid her debt to society. Now, she's dead and I'm listening to the reports on the TV news. It is all "Queen of Mean" and outrage that she left $12 million for the care and upkeep of her pet, $5 million to two Grandchildren (so long as they visit their father's grave once a year...) and ZIP to two other grandchildren (for reasons "known to them...").
BUT she left the bulk of her nearly or over billion dollar estate to a charitable foundation! Hardly any mention of the foundation, how it uses the money...what good works it supports, etc. Just that the dog got money and the grand kids didn't. Maybe the grand kids didn't deserve the money. They didn't earn it after all...maybe it is better for their charachters to earn their own living (or marry rich like Granny).
Anyway, I don't have much to say about Ms. Helmsley one way or the other...but I appreciate that she left the vast majority of her money to charity (where the dog's money will go when he is no longer with us)...and that doesn't seem so mean.
BUT she left the bulk of her nearly or over billion dollar estate to a charitable foundation! Hardly any mention of the foundation, how it uses the money...what good works it supports, etc. Just that the dog got money and the grand kids didn't. Maybe the grand kids didn't deserve the money. They didn't earn it after all...maybe it is better for their charachters to earn their own living (or marry rich like Granny).
Anyway, I don't have much to say about Ms. Helmsley one way or the other...but I appreciate that she left the vast majority of her money to charity (where the dog's money will go when he is no longer with us)...and that doesn't seem so mean.