View Full Version : Troofers: Why hasn't the FBI fabricated evidence against Osama?
Sword_Of_Truth
30th August 2007, 05:11 PM
Y'all make this big stink about what you think it says on OBL's wanted poster. So why then, doesn't this conspiracy that is able to rig 3 major skyscrapers for demolition without anybody noticing make something up to nail OBL with just so that you'll all shutup about it??
NYCEMT86
30th August 2007, 05:21 PM
Y'all make this big stink about what you think it says on OBL's wanted poster. So why then, doesn't this conspiracy that is able to rig 3 major skyscrapers for demolition without anybody noticing make something up to nail OBL with just so that you'll all shutup about it??
Thats because someone in the NWO missed the ultra secret meeting at the holiday inn. :zombie:
slyjoe
30th August 2007, 05:22 PM
Thats because someone in the NWO missed the ultra secret meeting at the holiday inn. :zombie:
The NWO is currently negotiating more favorable rates at the holiday inn EXPRESS. Then we won't have this problem. :)
Drudgewire
30th August 2007, 05:25 PM
Because if they "catch him" they won't still have the symbol of terror to sell their corrupt war with, silly.
I may not be good with sciencey stuff, but it's nice to know my standing as "reformed conspiracy theorist" can occasionally provide some insight into the goofy thought process behind them. :cool:
twinstead
30th August 2007, 05:57 PM
Because if they "catch him" they won't still have the symbol of terror to sell their corrupt war with, silly.
I may not be good with sciencey stuff, but it's nice to know my standing as "reformed conspiracy theorist" can occasionally provide some insight into the goofy thought process behind them. :cool:
Ah, but theoretically they could fabricate evidence against him, yet still not "catch him".
Best of both worlds.;)
Drudgewire
30th August 2007, 06:00 PM
Best of both worlds.;)
Yes but... well... um...
OK, you got me. Twoofer stupidity has advanced far beyond the kooks I hung with in the 90s.
Sword_Of_Truth
30th August 2007, 06:05 PM
Yes but... well... um...
OK, you got me. Twoofer stupidity has advanced far beyond the kooks I hung with in the 90s.
Seems you and I were in the same leaky boat. Dare I ask what got you out of the CT crowd?
For me it was a guy who told me at one of our meetings that the holocaust never happened and that blacks and whites who sleep together should be executed. That was when I started putting some distance between myself and those people. Time did the rest.
johnny karate
30th August 2007, 06:05 PM
I think issues like this, or the fact that no qualified experts on the planet support the CT, or not a single witness reports seeing anything that would indicate a CD, are way less important than the fact that a handful of people, at some point during the immediate and chaotic aftermath, say they heard explosions.
This is really what we should be focused on.
Drudgewire
30th August 2007, 06:08 PM
For me it was a guy who told me at one of our meetings that the holocaust never happened and that blacks and whites who sleep together should be executed. That was when I started putting some distance between myself and those people. Time did the rest.
I had a boss in the production studio I worked for claim he had the real Zapruder film that did indeed prove Cooper's claims about JFK being shot by the driver.
Months later he told me he was sorry he'd planted that new seed into a mind that really didn't need it but someone had done the same thing for him when he was a stupid conspiracy nut. Then he warned me to stop it because "it rots your brain."
Two years later it finally sank in he was giving me some of the best advice anyone ever would. :)
johnny karate
30th August 2007, 06:09 PM
Seems you and I were in the same leaky boat. Dare I ask what got you out of the CT crowd?
For me it was a guy who told me at one of our meetings that the holocaust never happened and that blacks and whites who sleep together should be executed. That was when I started putting some distance between myself and those people. Time did the rest.
I actually had a similiar experience that got me out of the CTer cult. Not that I have a problem with Holocaust denial, it's just that I love sleeping with black people.
[/bad joke]
twinstead
30th August 2007, 06:15 PM
I actually had a similiar experience that got me out of the CTer cult. Not that I have a problem with Holocaust denial, it's just that I love sleeping with black people.
[/bad joke]
:D
Drudgewire
30th August 2007, 06:18 PM
Seems you and I were in the same leaky boat.
I like to think, at least in some ways, it gives us a little more objectivity than a lot of the folks here. I don't know about you, but I'm still brain-damaged enough to hop right back on the wacko train if it wasn't so painfully obvious they have nothing more than the same puffs of smoke we used to swear the answers were right behind.
When you can look at something critically AND paranoid wooally, it just makes them look soooooo much more pathetic. :p
Pardalis
30th August 2007, 06:21 PM
They were already busy planting the fake evidence at Ground Zero, Shanksville and the Pentagon, they thought that would be enough for people to connect all this to Osama, duh. :rolleyes:
VespaGuy
31st August 2007, 06:36 AM
I've asked the "FBI" question plenty of times. Truthers don't seem to have an answer. They scream that the FBI is involved in the cover-up, but somehow the same FBI can't 'lie' about Osama on their most-wanted list?
Truthers run into the same problem with the NIST and FEMA. They claim that they are also involved in the cover-up, yet they cite the 'problems' with WTC7. They point to the explaination of WTC7 as a "low probability". Again, if these organizations are involved in the cover-up, why are they doing such a horrible job of covering up? Why not report that there was a "high probability"?
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.