PDA

View Full Version : history denial


ruslan
24th September 2007, 10:17 AM
Chronology Issue

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we live with. Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician and boasted to have solved the classical “ancient” mathematical ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem that was subsequently proven insoluble.

Snipped per rule 4

Please review your membership agreement. Do not post copyrighted material in entirety. You may provide a small section and a link to the rest.

madurobob
24th September 2007, 10:38 AM
This looks like it gonna be a fun thread to watch, I intend to do just that. Except for one thing:
Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, when was He crucified?
You have mathematically verifiable evidence this person existed?

Wildy
24th September 2007, 10:42 AM
Anything that you care to add? Say the second post from here (http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/AS9P9D6BJLJFV)?

What are we supposed to discuss?

ETA: Were you the guy who wrote that?

Crossbow
24th September 2007, 10:43 AM
Chronology Issue

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we live with. Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician and boasted to have solved the classical “ancient” mathematical ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem that was subsequently proven insoluble.

... snipped for brevity



How very interesting! The post above sounds exactly like the post below.

Welcome to JREF 'ruslan' and you may want to note the rule about posting spam and/or material that has copyrights.

Acad Dr Prof Anatoly Fomenko's Amazon Blog

http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/AS9P9D6BJLJFV

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we live with. Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician and boasted to have solved the classical “ancient” mathematical ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem that was subsequently proven insoluble.

...

kmortis
24th September 2007, 10:44 AM
I think the better question would be:

Have you mathematically proven that you have a freakin' point? Seriously, what are you getting at here? Is there a question? I see a lot of preamble, but little body.

kmortis
24th September 2007, 10:45 AM
How very interesting! The post above sounds exactly like the post below.

Welcome to JREF 'ruslan' and you may want to note the rule about posting spam and/or material that has copyrights.

Acad Dr Prof Anatoly Fomenko's Amazon Blog

http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/AS9P9D6BJLJFV

Ooo, good catch.
Oops, sorry, wildly, I didn't mean to ignore your post.

Wildy
24th September 2007, 10:49 AM
kmortis

Darn. That's what I get for not having a fancy avatar or a signature...

(I saw your reply when I was writing this but I still want to say it)

Crossbow
24th September 2007, 11:16 AM
Thanks much 'Miss Anthrope'!

You are waaaay cool.

:)

madurobob
24th September 2007, 11:26 AM
I this (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66394) the same discussion?

Curious....

kmortis
24th September 2007, 11:48 AM
kmortis

Darn. That's what I get for not having a fancy avatar or a signature...

(I saw your reply when I was writing this but I still want to say it)

Go on over to Humor. Check out a thread entitled "The Last Person To Post In This Thread Wins". You'll have your postcount up in no time.

Wildy
24th September 2007, 10:31 PM
I know. I just won the thread. About half of my posts here would have to be on that thread.

ruslan
25th September 2007, 02:10 AM
tons of stats moving JC human prototype to a.d. 1153-1186, constantinople alias rome:cool:. google>books>fomenko

Zep
25th September 2007, 02:17 AM
tons of stats moving JC human prototype to a.d. 1153-1186, constantinople alias rome:cool:. google>books>fomenkoReported for spamming.

Wildy
25th September 2007, 02:28 AM
ruslan

Do you have anything of your own to say? Or are you just going to plagiarize someone else and say it is your own opinion?

dudalb
25th September 2007, 03:24 PM
Check out the Wikipedia article on Formenko. The guy is a textbook example of Crackpot.Among his other bizarre beliefs is that all of ancient History (Egypt,Rome,etc) was faked by Renassiance scholars,and that the Medieval period is the earliest "real" period of history. A total loon.
Wikipedia is not the most reliable of sources,but the case for Formenko's being a crackpot is overwhelming..even when his supporters have been constanly rewriting the Wikipedia article his craziness shines through.

Doc Daneeka
28th September 2007, 09:42 PM
Actually, all of history up to January 19th, 1958 was faked by historians and scientists at MIT and Johns Hopkins. Any memories you claim to have that predate that time were implanted by the scientists. The world was really created in 1958.

If nothing else, I have learned from this thread that morality sucks. Had I no sense of morality, I could have taken the above drivel, written it up, and created a cult that would follow my every word and whim. I could have been the Hubbard of historians.

I can prove it mathematically:)