NoAstronomer
5th October 2007, 08:37 AM
I came across this article (http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2007/10/your_friday_dose_of_woo_the_fuzziness_of.php) at Respectful Insolence. The article refers to a web site at Biolumanetics.net (http://www.biolumanetics.net/). The short story is that this guy believes he has found a way to tell how healthy people are by taking pictures of them and looking at how fuzzy they appear.
Quite apart from the woo aspect, my opinion of this is that the guy is knowingly defrauding his 'patients'. The case study pictures are clearly the result of deliberate manipulation of lighting and shutter speeds. I should know I screw stuff like that up all the time. Notice how the in-animate objects in the pictures are also fuzzy.
Any comments? There is a phone number to contact on the Biolumanetics website but I'm too chicken to call.
I did search the forums for Biolumanetics and 'Patrick Richards' before posting, apologies if this issue has been raised before.
Quite apart from the woo aspect, my opinion of this is that the guy is knowingly defrauding his 'patients'. The case study pictures are clearly the result of deliberate manipulation of lighting and shutter speeds. I should know I screw stuff like that up all the time. Notice how the in-animate objects in the pictures are also fuzzy.
Any comments? There is a phone number to contact on the Biolumanetics website but I'm too chicken to call.
I did search the forums for Biolumanetics and 'Patrick Richards' before posting, apologies if this issue has been raised before.