PDA

View Full Version : LOL: LCFer I 'Turned In' Got Hot and Bothered (+ More JREF Definitions!!)


Good Lt
10th October 2007, 09:19 PM
Here's where I "turned him in (http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3043738&postcount=30)" (mentioned him in a post).

And now, IT'S ON: (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=17050)

Funny things that happen on the internet and forums.
To the JREFer that turned me in, why don't you come clean and raise your hand....so that I can stay away from you. The JREF site is so bogus and if you are a JREFer trolling here, one word 'BRAINLESS'.

Thanks for turning me in, didn't want anything to do with you guy's anyway because I am a twoofer.

I guess what everyone said about JREF is correct and thank you for proving LC is right about you.
Hey Lisa Simpson, my name is Troy McClure, you may remember me in such films as the voice of Crusty the Clown.
- - -
Dear DarkDragon,

*Automated response*

Unfortunately we couldn’t complete your registration for the JREF Forum.

We do not retain details of accounts that have not been approved however the most likely reason is that some required information wasn’t entered during the registration process (First name, Last name, Country and State if in the USA).

Please either try again to register or drop me an email and I will do my best to sort out any problems you may be experiencing.

**Note** my email address is lisa_simpson@randi.org, if you reply to the email address this email was sent from (jrefweb@gmail.com) it will cause a delay in our response to any query you may have,

Regards

Lisa Simpson
lisa_simpson@randi.org
JREF Forum Administrator

Apparently, he can't figure out how to fill out the registration fields for these forums, so he thinks it's a deliberate attempt to keep him out.

:hit:

Superior. Minds.

And as a bonus, here's another 'definition of JREFer' for an inquisitive mind:

They are the janitors, engineers, and plumbers of the empire's death star. You know the ones brought down by the rebel alliance and thermite. The one's who said that a weakness and the death star was imperviable and it was impossible.

:eek: They're onto us!! OH NOZ!!

Actually, there's a LOT of new definitions up for our entertainment. Let us have it, 4%ers!

Jingoists Regurgitating Excrement Forever

:duck:

Generally speaking,the term JREFer describes an individual that uses emotion to determine what is fact and what is fiction. To the JREFer, reason is subordinate to emotion in determining truth.

The JREFer "feels" like the 9/11 Commission Report is the truth, therefore, it is true.

Essentially, facts don't matter to the JREFer.

JREFers have a website dedicated to emotional rants and personal attacks directed
towards individuals pursuing the facts concerning 9/11.

:faint: That's what we call projection in the real world.

Thank You honway....I could not find any words to describe JREF's. If you have any questions about JREF's please don't ask me..like honway wrote they are exactly that.

brb...feel so dirty for even going there...need a loooonnngg shower, then again I think I'll sign off, just the thought of JREF's made me sick to my stomach.
Need to go RALPH.

He doesn't know that we secretly put Ipecac (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrup_of_ipecac) in teh Internetz. Muwahaha!

An actual JREFer is a member of the James Randi Educational Foundation...

But regarding 9/11 truth, it is the branch of said skeptic organisation which tends to go against actual skepticism and what the Foundation stands for, and instead uses a predetermined assumption to describe everything.

The word of the day is "irony."

Keep it up, LCFers. You're making it too easy.

lordofwaffles
10th October 2007, 09:43 PM
So, if we all work for the Evil Empire, I've got one question.

Where in the heck is my AT-AT? I mean the AT-STs are more practical, but have proven vulnerable to small intelligent mammals, and plucky rebel scum. The AT-AT doesn't even need guns, it just makes things go squish.

Regardless. I love the victim complex people get. "Oh no! They're secretly not letting me on a forum (because I can't register correctly)!" It's nearly as bad as the people who claim there's a war on Christmas, or dealing with the whiny little hippies in my college classes who, without a hint of irony referred to the FBI as the gestapo, or the United States of America as some kinda Hitler's Germany restored (because of course, the PATRIOT act and other stuff so works out to mass genocide, the deliberate slaughter of millions, the total suppression of basic human rights, and plunging most of the western world into war).

The claim to victim-hood is often a key element of an argument, establishing a grievance to be dealt with. However, truthers have to stoop pretty low, and find the stupidest asinine aspects to make themselves anything but the offending nuisance.

Good Lt
10th October 2007, 09:52 PM
Where in the heck is my AT-AT? I mean the AT-STs are more practical, but have proven vulnerable to small intelligent mammals, and plucky rebel scum. The AT-AT doesn't even need guns, it just makes things go squish.

No - you're totally right. If you're going to go for an instrument of destruction, go AT-AT. It's the difference between an A-1 Abrams and a Hum-Vee.

lordofwaffles
10th October 2007, 10:14 PM
With respect intended, it's the M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. A-1 is a steak sauce.

She still is a beauty though.

steve s
10th October 2007, 10:37 PM
The one's who said that a weakness and the death star was imperviable and it was impossible.

Aren't they the ones who are always talking about how indestructable the towers were?

Steve S.

Good Lt
10th October 2007, 11:11 PM
With respect intended, it's the M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. A-1 is a steak sauce.

Yeah. That's what I said. :footinmou

Ratatoskr
10th October 2007, 11:15 PM
The word of the day is "irony."


Isn't that the word of every day at the LCF?

defaultdotxbe
10th October 2007, 11:17 PM
Where in the heck is my AT-AT? I mean the AT-STs are more practical, but have proven vulnerable to small intelligent mammals, and plucky rebel scum. The AT-AT doesn't even need guns, it just makes things go squish.

yeah, but the AT-AT is vunerable to a dart with a string on it

http://pics.xbehome.com/albums/Upload/kittyATAT.jpg

Cl1mh4224rd
10th October 2007, 11:31 PM
Apparently, he can't figure out how to fill out the registration fields for these forums, so he thinks it's a deliberate attempt to keep him out.


Sounds like makker from the Screw Loose Change blog...

OldTigerCub
10th October 2007, 11:37 PM
Muahhahahahah......(evil laugh...ok lame evil laugh)
Dang it! I have the munchies for a steak with A1 now!:mad:

....and yeah....sorta sounds like makker...always complaining about jref and dancing jooooos......

Wildy
11th October 2007, 01:22 AM
yeah, but the AT-AT is vunerable to a dart with a string on it

That's why you go with a Star Destroyer. You get pretty much everything you need to assault a planet.

SpaceMonkeyZero
11th October 2007, 06:35 AM
He probably put his real name down as:
First: Insoidyob
Last: Eleventyoneesss1111

I mean, Lisa rejected my first attempt to register because I didn't put in my real last name. So it's pretty obvious... Lisa Simpson is an inside job!!!

Unsecured Coins
11th October 2007, 07:54 AM
She still is a beauty though.

indeed


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/Jaye77/m1a2.jpg

grmcdorman
11th October 2007, 09:06 AM
indeed


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/Jaye77/m1a2.jpg

Woot! Flying flaming tanks! :cool:

zombiebex
11th October 2007, 09:09 AM
They are the janitors, engineers, and plumbers of the empire's death star. You know the ones brought down by the rebel alliance and thermite. The one's who said that a weakness and the death star was imperviable and it was impossible.

Heeeey... he stole that from Clerks!

USAFMXOfficer
11th October 2007, 09:12 AM
With respect intended, it's the M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. A-1 is a steak sauce.

She still is a beauty though.

A1's are good but the M1A2 with the TUSK mod is awesome.

Fnord
11th October 2007, 09:40 AM
I registered on the Loose Change (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?) site about five minutes ago. Let's see how long it lasts.

Fnord
11th October 2007, 10:08 AM
I registered on the Loose Change (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?) site about five minutes ago. Let's see how long it lasts.

The first response contained a link to Google, which contains several other links back to JREF. I've been outed.

nicepants
11th October 2007, 10:13 AM
I registered on the Loose Change (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?) site about five minutes ago. Let's see how long it lasts.

Be sure to PM me your address so we can get your weekly "NWO Schill"[sic] paycheck sent out.

negativ
11th October 2007, 10:16 AM
He doesn't know that we secretly put Ipecac (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrup_of_ipecac) in teh Internetz. Muwahaha!

Maybe we should consider adding magnesium citrate (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_citrate) too. Maybe it would help rid them of that which they are so desperately full of.

lordofwaffles
11th October 2007, 10:19 AM
The A2 is nice, the TUSK kit actually has components that go to all the M1 series tanks (loader's gunshield, some ERA, slat armor for the aft, etc, etc). I'm really a big fan of being able to run the .50 from inside the tank like on the A1 though. That and it's the Joes inside the tank that make it kick ass. I'd be more worried facing down a Sherman driven by Americans or Israelis than one of the Egyptian run Abrams.

Star Destroyers do have a distinct appeal, but they seem to suffer from a ship-based stormtrooper effect. I can't recall them actually hitting a target in any of the movies (I take that back, maybe in the very opening of Episode IV, but that really wasn't much of a fight).

lapman
11th October 2007, 10:24 AM
yeah, but the AT-AT is vunerable to a dart with a string on it


I customized mine with nano-thermite string cutters on the legs. Those rebel scum will never bring it down! MMMWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!:degrin:

zombiebex
11th October 2007, 10:39 AM
Aha, the Clerks clip. Language warning.

n6lzEhoXads

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6lzEhoXads
Sorry, I've never used the YT tag before....

SpaceMonkeyZero
11th October 2007, 10:50 AM
Aha, the Clerks clip. Language warning.

n6lzEhoXads
fixed?