Good Lt
15th October 2007, 07:31 PM
What to do when "everything's been said already? (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=17213)"
We need a New Pearl Harbor like we need another 911....
but if we are going to get Justice for those who have fallen....
We need something with MORE GAS.... any ideas... post them please.....
Brain...activity...failing...
it's hard when slam dunk evidence is met by closed eyes
What evidence would that be?
we've said everything already. there's no argument we can give that hasn't been posted here a hundred times already.
I thought you guys were on the cutting edge every day...maybe you should ask your Dear Leaders why they haven't shown you the primrose path yet.
Of course, when all else fails, you could compose a "Grand Unified Theory" of 9-11 Woo Woo:
1) Organize. Get your people together and form a steering committee.
2) Let that steering committee determine what information will be "Canonical" and what will be heresy. Remember, it must all be consistant, and devoid of self-contradictory theories and statements. [ed. - complete the transition from a loose conglomeration of cranks to a full blown cult. Check.]
3) Form a constituency. These people will provide financial support for research and development of one, single "Grand Unified Theory" on what really happened that day. [ed. - Ya think? getting around to telling everyone what really happened might be good...6 years in to your little fantasy club]
4) Hire a lawyer - or an entire law firm - to present your evidence in a court of law - if not in this country, then in Helsinki where the "World Court" has tried war criminals. [ed. - :eye-poppi ]
In other words, make a legal case that leads to justice. Right now, your movement is so fragmented and disjointed that no one, single, well-constructed case could ever be brought before a judge or international tribunal. A case that could withstand the best efforts of any skeptic who would tear it apart. Your case must be cohesive, concise, and built along the same laws of reason that the skeptics will surely use against you.
Until then, the cacaphony of your movement will only serve to amuse or annoy the very people who could lend credence to your case. [ed. - :big:]
I don't think this guy's aware of the Citizen's Jury failure, the Kevin Barrett failure or the coming Judy Woo Woo failure:
An army? Not as much as you think. A dozen or so individuals dedicated to your cause and understanding the basics of tort law could get the case heard in court within a year. But first you have to get yourselves organized, then funded, then start collating all of the data into one cohesive step-by-step report, and then presented to a reputable law firm. Only then will your voices be heard as something more than the unrequited rantings of a betrayed people.
Better get started; you've already wasted 6 years! [ed. - this isn't one of you guys, right?]
Keep beating your heads into walls over there - pure gold! :)
We need a New Pearl Harbor like we need another 911....
but if we are going to get Justice for those who have fallen....
We need something with MORE GAS.... any ideas... post them please.....
Brain...activity...failing...
it's hard when slam dunk evidence is met by closed eyes
What evidence would that be?
we've said everything already. there's no argument we can give that hasn't been posted here a hundred times already.
I thought you guys were on the cutting edge every day...maybe you should ask your Dear Leaders why they haven't shown you the primrose path yet.
Of course, when all else fails, you could compose a "Grand Unified Theory" of 9-11 Woo Woo:
1) Organize. Get your people together and form a steering committee.
2) Let that steering committee determine what information will be "Canonical" and what will be heresy. Remember, it must all be consistant, and devoid of self-contradictory theories and statements. [ed. - complete the transition from a loose conglomeration of cranks to a full blown cult. Check.]
3) Form a constituency. These people will provide financial support for research and development of one, single "Grand Unified Theory" on what really happened that day. [ed. - Ya think? getting around to telling everyone what really happened might be good...6 years in to your little fantasy club]
4) Hire a lawyer - or an entire law firm - to present your evidence in a court of law - if not in this country, then in Helsinki where the "World Court" has tried war criminals. [ed. - :eye-poppi ]
In other words, make a legal case that leads to justice. Right now, your movement is so fragmented and disjointed that no one, single, well-constructed case could ever be brought before a judge or international tribunal. A case that could withstand the best efforts of any skeptic who would tear it apart. Your case must be cohesive, concise, and built along the same laws of reason that the skeptics will surely use against you.
Until then, the cacaphony of your movement will only serve to amuse or annoy the very people who could lend credence to your case. [ed. - :big:]
I don't think this guy's aware of the Citizen's Jury failure, the Kevin Barrett failure or the coming Judy Woo Woo failure:
An army? Not as much as you think. A dozen or so individuals dedicated to your cause and understanding the basics of tort law could get the case heard in court within a year. But first you have to get yourselves organized, then funded, then start collating all of the data into one cohesive step-by-step report, and then presented to a reputable law firm. Only then will your voices be heard as something more than the unrequited rantings of a betrayed people.
Better get started; you've already wasted 6 years! [ed. - this isn't one of you guys, right?]
Keep beating your heads into walls over there - pure gold! :)