Mercutio
20th October 2007, 08:54 PM
This week, Daniel Loxton (editor of Junior Skeptic) offers his own
personal perspective on the future of skepticism as a movement.
Presented as an original full-length audio article his op-ed essay
argues that the search for a "new skepticism" is misguided—and that
the early titans of skepticism had it right in the first place.
Then, Derek and Swoopy sit down with Daniel to talk about the skeptics
paradox: that so many people feel exhausted and fed up by the
paranormal, at the very time that the most exciting new
developments—from podcasts to conferences to community—are firmly
focused on our core paranormal concerns.
Has classic skepticism run its course? According to Daniel, we're only
now getting ready to start.
personal perspective on the future of skepticism as a movement.
Presented as an original full-length audio article his op-ed essay
argues that the search for a "new skepticism" is misguided—and that
the early titans of skepticism had it right in the first place.
Then, Derek and Swoopy sit down with Daniel to talk about the skeptics
paradox: that so many people feel exhausted and fed up by the
paranormal, at the very time that the most exciting new
developments—from podcasts to conferences to community—are firmly
focused on our core paranormal concerns.
Has classic skepticism run its course? According to Daniel, we're only
now getting ready to start.