What’s next for the WTC “Truthers”?

[The Man]

What’s next for the WTC “Truthers”?


After making a spectacle of themselves on live TV, what is next?

Perhaps, a clandestine “Controlled” demolition of some other building, just to show how the Twin Towers or building 7 could have been done?

At what point will these people become just like the conspirators they seek to expose?

[kookbreaker]

They'll do something else stupid. Pat themselves on the back for it, and say how they are gaining ground while everyone who sees their antics shakes their heads.

Oh, sorry, did you want something specific?

[CHF]

It seems the 9/11 twoofers no longer see "exposing the REAL 9/11 perps" as being their goal.

Their main priority now is getting back at all the people who destroy their arguments and make them look bad - hense the idiocy directed at Bill Maher or Dylan's obsession with Mark Roberts.

[MarkyX]

Their main priority now is getting back at all the people who destroy their arguments and make them look bad - hense the idiocy directed at Bill Maher or Dylan's obsession with Mark Roberts.


Actions speak louder then words (lol, get it?). The fact that they rather focus their attention on people who point out logical flaws within their argument instead of the "real perps of 9/11" should say a lot to outsiders and those sitting on the fence.

It's pathetic.

[Henry Crun]

It's pathetic.And it´s desperate and - useless.
I made some checks with Alexa on a dozend truther-sites.
The Maher-Show seemed to have zero effect.
The views on LCF didn´t skyrocket neither.

In fact all these sites are not quite popular...
Some had a spike in september but couldn´t keep that level. Their best times are gone.

I am not the IT-wizkid, maybe there are better ways to check traffic, rankings and page visits.
But Alexa told me truthertime time has passed. They do have heavy problems recruiting new costumers.
That does not depend on their method of bringing the twoof - it depends on the twoof itself i think.

[The Man]

It might be better if they were, truly, like the conspirators they seek to expose…

NONEXISTANT.

[BenBurch]

Oh, I have been under attack for opposing these folks for months over on DemocraticWarrior.com

They got pissed off that I wouldn't go away or back down and so they went off and started their own board.

It's pathetic.

[MetalliSociety]

I just went over to Democratic Warrior and saw one of your posts on WTC 7 and someone said something abot the History Channel being "the Nazi Channel" cause it's owned by the Hearst Corporation. Why do they think this group is so terrible?

[SpaceMonkeyZero]

I just went over to Democratic Warrior and saw one of your posts on WTC 7 and someone said something abot the History Channel being "the Nazi Channel" cause it's owned by the Hearst Corporation. Why do they think this group is so terrible?

It really must be nice for truthers to just be able to throw out all rational thought and latch on to *one* thing and stick their fingers in their ears, stomp their feet, close their eyes and go "LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOUUUUU 9/11 INSIDE JOB LA LA LA LA LA BILL MAHER IS AN INSIDE JOB LA LA LA LA LA"

Life would be so much easier.

[Drudgewire]

I just went over to Democratic Warrior and saw one of your posts on WTC 7 and someone said something abot the History Channel being "the Nazi Channel" cause it's owned by the Hearst Corporation. Why do they think this group is so terrible?
I can't speak for them, but a lot of folks joke the "H" logo stands for "Hitler" rather than "History" because of all the specials they run about him and WWII in general.

[uk_dave]

Sharks and Nazis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3m0qKiY_Ek

:D

[jhunter1163]

What’s next for the WTC “Truthers”?

I'm guessing that the phrase "do you want fries with that?" will figure prominently in the careers of many of them.

[BenBurch]

I'm guessing that the phrase "do you want fries with that?" will figure prominently in the careers of many of them.

Except for the few females who likely will be asking "Want a date?" at curbside.

[dudalb]

I just went over to Democratic Warrior and saw one of your posts on WTC 7 and someone said something abot the History Channel being "the Nazi Channel" cause it's owned by the Hearst Corporation. Why do they think this group is so terrible?

Because the reputation and memory of William Randolph Hearst,king of Yellow Journalism, are still strong and the name "Hearst" still raises hackles. Of course the Hearst chain has been no worse then any other Media chain since Hearst's death in 1950. But the memoriesof the Bad Old Days continues.


Drudgewire is right about the Nickname "Hitler Channel" because of the popularity of World War 2 programming on the History channel,but somehow I think the Twoofers nickname "The Nazi Channel" is rooted in conspiracy nonsense.

[Thunder]

They will stop traffic on Broadway, all get arrested, and declare "The War has Begun!!!"

[jhunter1163]

They will stop traffic on Broadway, all get arrested, and declare "The War has Begun... DON'T TASE ME, BRO!!!!"

Fixed that for you.

[tacodaemon]

Because the reputation and memory of William Randolph Hearst,king of Yellow Journalism, are still strong and the name "Hearst" still raises hackles. Of course the Hearst chain has been no worse then any other Media chain since Hearst's death in 1950. But the memoriesof the Bad Old Days continues.


Yeah, Bermas likes to say the same thing about Popular Mechanics because it's a Hearst Corp. publication. He even yelled out something about it being "a Hearst yellow journalism magazine" during the NPR roundtable with him, Dylan, and the two Pop Mech guys.

[Pardalis]

What’s next for the WTC “Truthers”?

For the lucky ones I guess a life, for the stubborn ones... this (http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/88864571f5f0d59e1.png).