PDA

View Full Version : Dolly Parton believes God proven to exist by John Cabot’s cabin boy’s conversion to a


Lothian
31st October 2007, 07:07 AM
I don’t think Doc has started a thread today so I thought I would save it the effort.




Shame the full title would not fit in.

Dolly Parton believes God proven to exist by John Cabot’s cabin boy’s conversion to abstinence being the foundation of democracy.

Garrette
31st October 2007, 07:27 AM
Far too many humorous responses involving Dolly Parton and paradise-on-earth came to mind to list them all or to even pick a good representative.

Kindly insert your own Dolly-Parton's-chest-is-heavenly-proof-itself comment here.

madurobob
31st October 2007, 07:32 AM
Well, from what I've read Dolly is no Christian (http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/CCM/dolly_parton-exposed.htm):
In an interview by Rick Clark, Dolly Parton revealed that she is NO Christian. I do not write articles to be unkind, but out of necessity to expose those who masquerade as Christians. Anyone who knows anything about the history of rock-n-roll knows that the band Led Zeppelin is Satanic to the core.

Someone was very upset that Dolly covered "Stairway to Heaven". As if that in and of itself was not a sign of the apocalypse.

Lothian
31st October 2007, 07:51 AM
Well, from what I've read Dolly is no Christian (http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/CCM/dolly_parton-exposed.htm):..but without god there would be no Dolly, he made them both in his image.

Beerina
31st October 2007, 08:11 AM
Dolly Parton believes God proven to exist by John Cabot’s cabin boy’s conversion to abstinence being the foundation of democracy.

Technically, she's correct, if you interpret "abstinence" as a euphamism for the use of religion by the political class to gain and maintain power via control of the masses.

J. Arthur Hastur
31st October 2007, 04:11 PM
The girls with giant breasts always turn out to be with Satan.

Redtail
31st October 2007, 04:22 PM
Dolly Parton could breast feed Ethiopia.

Tanstaafl
31st October 2007, 05:41 PM
Dolly Parton could breast feed Ethiopia.


LOL. :D

ChristineR
31st October 2007, 07:00 PM
They're implants, you men, you! She couldn't breastfeed anyone, implants that large require destroying the nipple.

Gord_in_Toronto
31st October 2007, 08:35 PM
They're implants, you men, you! She couldn't breastfeed anyone, implants that large require destroying the nipple.

Oh noes. Don't tell me things like that. I just want to dream. :blush:

Redtail
31st October 2007, 09:32 PM
They're implants, you men, you! She couldn't breastfeed anyone, implants that large require destroying the nipple.

Listen you woman you! I watch a lotta porn and their nipples are fine!:p

madurobob
31st October 2007, 09:47 PM
..but without god there would be no Dolly, he made them both in his image.

Yes, god was a Nashville plastic surgeon in the late 60s. Sadly, he's branched out to other fields since then.

Oh noes. Don't tell me things like that. I just want to dream.
Oh, come-on, the motor-boatin' would still be just as fun. :)

One of her famous quotes goes something like "Are they mine? Of course they are - bought and paid for!" Thats one investment that really paid off... I mean, she's a talented country & bluegrass singer/musician, but would she have an amusement park in Tennessee if she didn't have volleyballs pinned to her chest?

triadboy
31st October 2007, 10:37 PM
They're implants, you men, you! She couldn't breastfeed anyone, implants that large require destroying the nipple.


Then could she lubricate small engines?

JEROME DA GNOME
31st October 2007, 10:41 PM
They might be real.

1972
http://www.printcenter.org/ExhibitsPics/Dolly%20Parton%201972.jpg

Marquis de Carabas
31st October 2007, 10:44 PM
They might be real.

1972
http://www.printcenter.org/ExhibitsPics/Dolly%20Parton%201972.jpg
Those were. She lost a lot of weight after she became a superstar, apparently too much for her own taste in the bust, so she had her breasts augmented in the 80s to bring them back up to standard.

That's the official version, at least.

JEROME DA GNOME
31st October 2007, 10:48 PM
Those were. She lost a lot of weight after she became a superstar, apparently too much for her own taste in the bust, so she had her breasts augmented in the 80s to bring them back up to standard.

That's the official version, at least.

Neat story. Sounds plausible.

Thanks!

bruto
31st October 2007, 11:15 PM
I heard an interview with Dolly Parton on Fresh Air a few years ago, in which she remarked (accuracy not guaranteed) "It costs a lot of money to look this cheap." I thought that was kind of funny.

timhau
31st October 2007, 11:24 PM
..but without god there would be no Dolly, he made them both in his image.

I always thought God was a boob.

ChristineR
1st November 2007, 07:43 AM
There's another version that says she got her first pair at age 22, which would be 1968, which is possible, but does seem pretty unlikely. If she really did have sixties era implants it's safe to assume she has had complications. :(

Anyhow it's quite possible for a woman that age and size to have natural breasts that big, but it doesn't really fit with the claim that they got smaller when she lost weight. She's not overweight in that old picture, and most women do not get proportionally bigger breasts when they gain weight.

This Guy
1st November 2007, 08:05 AM
Being from Nashville, I have it on good authority that they may not be all natural. But I too like to dream ;)

She is a very sweet lady though. Anyone I've ever talked to that had any dealings with her only have nice things to say about her.

Some quotes (as best my memory will allow) -

When one of her worker's (forget what the lady did) house burnt down, Dolly took up a collection from the other workers, and then matched (or put in more) what they gave, to help her get set back up.

When one of her niece's had a birthday, she had a Limos go pick up all the guest and bring them to the party.

I've heard other stories, but can't bring any to mind now. I actually dated someone, for awhile, that was very close to her. She spent a lot of time with Dolly, here in Tennessee, and when Dolly traveled. She only had great things to say about her.

I'm mostly an old rock and roll fan, but of the few country singers I like, Dolly is right up there on top of the list. :)

Lothian
1st November 2007, 08:07 AM
Please don’t derail this thread. This is, following Doc’s example, about God existence being scientifically proven through appeals to authority, appeals to tradition, Argumentum ad populum and other fallacies not falsies.

Please refrain from discussing Ms Parton’s chest* here.







*although I suppose posting lots more pictures merely to illustrate points already made would be fine.

Beerina
1st November 2007, 10:28 AM
There's another version that says she got her first pair at age 22, which would be 1968, which is possible, but does seem pretty unlikely. If she really did have sixties era implants it's safe to assume she has had complications. :(

Anyhow it's quite possible for a woman that age and size to have natural breasts that big, but it doesn't really fit with the claim that they got smaller when she lost weight. She's not overweight in that old picture, and most women do not get proportionally bigger breasts when they gain weight.

Dammit, now you've made me think about this.

Hmmm, with no other knowledge, it's reasonable to assume fat is deposited proportionally all over the body. Fat is almost all of the breast tissue, although it's far from almost all of the body in general.

Hence if a person increased their fat by 30% (vs. fat they used to have, not vs. body mass as a whole) then every place that gains fat will gain 30% more fat.

Presuming the body as a whole is 40% fat, then that 40% will gain an additional 30% (of that 40%) bringing the 40% volume (whatever that is) to 1.3x(40%, whatever that is) volume. This amounts to an additional 12% w.r.t. the body fat %, so the person's body is now 52% body fat.

So the body as a whole got a little fatter.

However, the breast, basically 100% fat, now has 130% fat. It has gained 30% volume, compared to the body as a whole gaining 12% volume.


So I conclude that as a woman gains weight, her breast size must grow proportionally faster than her overall size.


Which isn't the real world :( , so a premise must be mistaken. Either a breast isn't mostly fat (it would actually have to have less % fat than the body as a whole) or it is deposited in the breast more slowly than elsewhere (and the assumption that fat is deposited uniformly at all fat-depositing locations is incorrect.)