ae911truth.... the Unknown Comics?

[Mr.Herbert]

Next Speaking Engagement:
Brown Bag Lunch Discussion Group
(2nd Tue. of each month) – Richard Gage, AIA
Tue, Nov 13, 2007 • 12:00 noon
1301 Clay St., Oakland (http://www.ae911truth.org/speakings.php#speak35)

Brown bag Lunch Discussion?

Does anyone know how many ended up at their last discussion this past weekend?

I signed up for their group over two months ago and finally got a reply today:

My name is Doug Plumb and I am working with the ae911truth group to verify members that have signed onto the web site. Before I can display your name I need to speak with you.

You can call me at

[T.A.M.]

Not that I personally mind, but are you sure he wanted his phone number posted publicly?

Just thought I'd mention it.

TAM:)

[boloboffin]

Gage is literally out for a free lunch. What a schmuck.

[qarnos]

They should consider changing their name to Architects Engineering 9/11 Truth.

[Mr.Herbert]

Not that I personally mind, but are you sure he wanted his phone number posted publicly?

Just thought I'd mention it.

TAM:)


Good point.... all better :)

They posted my name within 12 hours of me signing up without verification! (no it wasn't my real name)

[JimBenArm]

To totally derail this thread:
Mr. Herbert, you want to feel my paper-throwing arm?
(Love the avatar!)

[Mr.Herbert]

I have lots of popsicles in my basement... :p

[beachnut]

Good point.... all better :)

They posted my name within 12 hours of me signing up without verification! (no it wasn't my real name)
There are a lot of people who do not know they are nut cases as their "friends" have signed them up for this dumb group.

[boloboffin]

They should consider changing their name to Architects Engineering 9/11 Truth.

I am stealing that.

[bofors]

They should consider changing their name to Architects Engineering 9/11 Truth.

Cute...

[Jonnyclueless]

And fitting...

[beachnut]

They should consider changing their name to Architects Engineering 9/11 Truth.
Yes, their other name is ironic, since they regurgitate old lies from made up junk of 9/11 truth.

Your new name is perfect. Why are they passing on old lies; not too original.

A&E9/11 guys selling truth (DVD with lies) - 15 dollars. The real meaning of 9/11 truth – bamboozle/bilk/con/dupe/swindle the dummies. http://www.ae911truth.org/dvdorder.php Pay for lies, or just google the crap for free.

Presenting the new 9/11 Truth DVD from AE911Truth.org: Just 15 dollars. Notice the "new", it means old junk. Like truth means lies, "new" means old. There is a term for this tripe.

[Mr.Herbert]

....and funny

[bofors]

Good point.... all better :)

They posted my name within 12 hours of me signing up without verification! (no it wasn't my real name)

Let me get this straight...

You claim to have bogusly joined AE911Truth?

If 9/11 Truth is such a week and pathetic movement, tell me, why do feel the need to engage in this type of immoral behavior?

You make me sick...

[Minadin]

Well, I could actually join the group, with credentials and etc, but they'd paste my name over a whole bunch of bull-poop theories and other nonsense I don't agree with, so why should I?

I mean, I'm for truth in all things, including / especially the attacks on Sept. 11th 2001, but I've serious doubts that AE911truth shares my goals. They are going to have to convince me.

[Jonnyclueless]

Let me get this straight...

You claim to have bogusly joined AE911Truth?

If 9/11 Truth is such a week and pathetic movement, tell me, why do feel the need to engage in this type of immoral behavior?

You make me sick...


To prove that their whole requirement process is a fraud. What's immoral is touting to be a group of so called experts when really the criteria is that you peddle these BS Woo theories. Bogusly joining proves that.

Running a web site that peddles the same exact Woo as all the other tabloids, but trying to mislead people under this pretext of being professionals makes ME sick.

[beachnut]

Let me get this straight...

You claim to have bogusly joined AE911Truth?

... 9/11 Truth is such a week and pathetic movement ...

You make me sick...
I think most of the people who joined are bogus. The ideas of AE911LIES are bogus.

AE911Truth - is just a money making project - they sell lies for 15 dollars, call it the "truth", and bilk idiots out of their money. Do you know any idiots who have bought the 15 dollar "truth"?

You know you are missing critical knowledge when you up buy a 15 dollar DVD from these liars.

There are some people signed up as members, and they did not sign up; someone else signed them up. One time most of the members were false; just made up. But when you find out the truth, AE911LIES is out to make 15 dollars off of 45 cent DVDs full of lies; you understand integrity of the members is not critical, nor is reality. This group is telling lies to make money off a the fringe idiots who fall for this type of CT due to bias or stupidity.

Making a film full of lies about 9/11 - $2500
Buying old lies about 9/11 on DVD - $15
Per unit copy of DVD - $0.45
Debunking all the lies of 9/11 truth by diverse set of rational people at JREF - Priceless
For all your debunking - GravyCard - http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home

Being duped by 9/11 truth - Embarrassing
Understanding they are fools, and you have gained experience to avoid future fraud in other forms – Illuminating

[uk_dave]

You make me sick...

Welcome to the real world where no one takes AE911truth seriously.

Seriously.

[leftysergeant]

Richard Gage posts doctored videos to his website in order to make his woo seem less wooish. this is unethical conduct. Since ae911t is mostly his ego trip, we can assume that the entire enterprise is an unethical operation.

Is it unethical to infiltrate an unethical organization with the intent to spy or to monkey wrench it?

I think not.

[defaultdotxbe]

Let me get this straight...

You claim to have bogusly joined AE911Truth?

If 9/11 Truth is such a week and pathetic movement, tell me, why do feel the need to engage in this type of immoral behavior?

You make me sick...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_Ethical_Hacker

its the same concept, we are demonstrating that despite new "confirmations" the system is not immune to simple fraud, therefore we cannot be certain any of the architects and engineers listed are actually architects or engineers

the old system was even worse, i registered with an obviously fake name and it was still displayed on the website, lol

[Dave Rogers]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_Ethical_Hacker

its the same concept, we are demonstrating that despite new "confirmations" the system is not immune to simple fraud, therefore we cannot be certain any of the architects and engineers listed are actually architects or engineers

That's a pretty dodgy rationale. Ethical hackers are under contract to the owners of the systems they're hacking, and it's perfectly clear that no such contract existed between the owners of AE911T and a group of individuals who post on this forum. However, since no damage was caused or attempted to be caused and the website was not used for anything other than its stated purpose of registering those who chose, for whatever reasons, to register under whatever user names they chose, I don't think it's really necessary to make excuses. I would characterise the acts as mischievous rather than immoral.

Dave

[defaultdotxbe]

That's a pretty dodgy rationale. Ethical hackers are under contract to the owners of the systems they're hacking, and it's perfectly clear that no such contract existed between the owners of AE911T and a group of individuals who post on this forum. However, since no damage was caused or attempted to be caused and the website was not used for anything other than its stated purpose of registering those who chose, for whatever reasons, to register under whatever user names they chose, I don't think it's really necessary to make excuses. I would characterise the acts as mischievous rather than immoral.

Dave
well thats why i said its the same concept, it was done without malicious intent (im assuming) simply to demonstrate a vunerability, thats what ethical hacking is (the certified ethical hacker article was the clearest definition of the concept i could find)

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

That's a pretty dodgy rationale. Ethical hackers are under contract to the owners of the systems they're hacking, and it's perfectly clear that no such contract existed between the owners of AE911T and a group of individuals who post on this forum. However, since no damage was caused or attempted to be caused and the website was not used for anything other than its stated purpose of registering those who chose, for whatever reasons, to register under whatever user names they chose, I don't think it's really necessary to make excuses. I would characterise the acts as mischievous rather than immoral.

Dave
Since no attempt was made to continue the subterfuge beyond the initial account creation on the site in question; I would say it is even milder than Randi's Project Alpha.

[negativ]

Silly Truthers and their "Brown Bag Lunches".

I've heard that NWO Kitty is planning a Black Bag Lunch soon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bag_operation). I wonder who's invited?

[Mr.Herbert]

Let me get this straight...

You claim to have bogusly joined AE911Truth?

If 9/11 Truth is such a week and pathetic movement, tell me, why do feel the need to engage in this type of immoral behavior?

You make me sick...

I said i did not use my REAL name.... . Your movement makes me sick. People from the truth movement make death threats, harass innocent people, you name it... they've done it. Immoral behavior??? Removing personal attack