View Full Version : Take The 9/11 Challenge!
cyclonic
8th November 2007, 01:45 PM
CLUNKITY CLUNK FAN SpudXXXX just posted this video!
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=VjLGmmXQRTQ
Horatius
8th November 2007, 01:55 PM
Yet Another Self Debunking 9/11 Video.
DGM
8th November 2007, 02:03 PM
OK
Try to say "bang" 15 times in one second.
Can't do it?
Well then an m-16 can't shoot 900 rounds a min. then.
Makes about the same sense.
Dumb All Over
8th November 2007, 02:04 PM
Please, everyone, offer up a big round of clapping for the dumbest troofer video I've ever seen.
uk_dave
8th November 2007, 02:04 PM
OK
Try to say "bang" 15 times in one second.
Can't do it?
Well then an m-16 can't shoot 900 rounds a min. then.
Makes about the same sense.
['truther'] But...but... but.... bullets have explosives in them!!!111eleventy!!!11!! [/'truther']
Unsecured Coins
8th November 2007, 02:23 PM
Just because this guy can do it and you can't, means that just because only certain people can do it it and unless you're someone who can, then you can't cause like, that would mean that it's common and stuff like that isn't common so... 9/11 was an inside job!
*face explodes*
PhantomWolf
8th November 2007, 02:27 PM
Well then an m-16 can't shoot 900 rounds a min. then.
They can't. High capacity magazines only carry 90 rounds. Let's see you reload 9 times in one minute. :p
DGM
8th November 2007, 02:32 PM
They can't. High capacity magazines only carry 90 rounds. Let's see you reload 9 times in one minute. :p
OK, I should have specified "rate of fire" not actual shots. :boxedin:
PhantomWolf
8th November 2007, 02:39 PM
OK, I should have specified "rate of fire" not actual shots. :boxedin:
Ahh so now you're backpeddling on it and changing your story hmmm... that proves you're just a Government shill. :p
Redtail
8th November 2007, 02:45 PM
I for one would like to thank spudxxx because now I truly understand that line "... This isn't right... This isn't even wrong."
DGM
8th November 2007, 02:56 PM
Ahh so now you're backpeddling on it and changing your story hmmm... that proves you're just a Government shill. :p
Had to back down after my experiments with the MOAC (Mother Of All Clips, 900 rds) melted the barrel! But then I had to argue fire melting steel! I just can't win.:rolleyes:
JMarshall
8th November 2007, 03:01 PM
They can't. High capacity magazines only carry 90 rounds. Let's see you reload 9 times in one minute. :p
Actually high capacity magazines only hold 30 rounds, while C-mags can carry 90, C-mags aren't standard. The other magazines that are standard are 10 round, and 20 round magazines. C-mags were created by after market suppliers.
Other than that, yes sustained fire is a bit hard to accomplish when changing magazines...
defaultdotxbe
8th November 2007, 03:04 PM
i think we are all ignoring the real issue here
why does the "music" in that video sound like a retard mimicking a baby asking for a bottle?
PhantomWolf
8th November 2007, 03:25 PM
Actually high capacity magazines only hold 30 rounds, while C-mags can carry 90, C-mags aren't standard. The other magazines that are standard are 10 round, and 20 round magazines. C-mags were created by after market suppliers.
Other than that, yes sustained fire is a bit hard to accomplish when changing magazines...
I knew they weren't standard, I was looking for the largest I could find to decrease the number of reload times. here's the webpage. (http://www.mwgco.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=MWG/PROD/90-Rounder/MWG-223-90A)
cyclonic
8th November 2007, 03:51 PM
i think we are all ignoring the real issue here
why does the "music" in that video sound like a retard mimicking a baby asking for a bottle?
lol, it must be a sheeple song.
Bell
8th November 2007, 03:53 PM
Yet Another Self Debunking 9/11 Video.
Hell yeah.
And I clap my hands 11 times a second for that.
Gravy
8th November 2007, 04:18 PM
What, no furries? That's the worst pron video I've seen all year.
Gravy
8th November 2007, 04:23 PM
I knew they weren't standard, I was looking for the largest I could find to decrease the number of reload times. here's the webpage. (http://www.mwgco.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?page=MWG/PROD/90-Rounder/MWG-223-90A)"Advanced space-age materials." Translation: "Welcome to 50 years ago!"
"Always avoid lethal situations whenever possible." What the hell kind of rampage will that be?
Gravy
8th November 2007, 04:29 PM
Just watched the video again. Fear of guys like Ken is why I didn't go to massage therapy school.
I can't believe the doofus blew the chance to use something by "Clap your hands say yeah!"
rcronk
8th November 2007, 04:42 PM
Wow! That was the stupidest video I've ever seen. I think I'm dumber for having watched it. That must be the truthers' new plan - post dumb videos to make debunkers as dumb as a truther.
Horatius
8th November 2007, 04:58 PM
Actually high capacity magazines only hold 30 rounds, while C-mags can carry 90, C-mags aren't standard. The other magazines that are standard are 10 round, and 20 round magazines. C-mags were created by after market suppliers.
Other than that, yes sustained fire is a bit hard to accomplish when changing magazines...
These landed in the hastily cleared street and began disgorging native
Company soldiers--Kragan mercenaries, he noted with satisfaction. They
carried a modified version of the regular Terran Federation infantry
rifle, stocked and sighted to conform to their physical peculiarities,
with long, thorn-like, triangular bayonets. One platoon ran forward,
dropped to one knee, and began firing rapidly into what was left of
the mob. Four-handed soldiers can deliver a simply astonishing volume
of fire, particularly when armed with auto-rifles having twenty-shot
drop-out magazines which can be changed with the lower hands without
lowering the weapon.
Uller Uprising (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19474/19474.txt), by H. Beam Piper.
Not really relevant, but that's what I thought of....
tacodaemon
8th November 2007, 05:32 PM
I think I'm going to start using SpudXXXX's "you can't clap as fast as this guy, therefore I am right, and also I'm right even if you can clap as fast as this guy" line of reasoning in other areas of my life.
T.A.M.
8th November 2007, 05:36 PM
Omg...
TAM:)
PhantomWolf
8th November 2007, 05:42 PM
What, no furries? That's the worst pron video I've seen all year.
Well that's your problem right there.
LashL
8th November 2007, 11:39 PM
That video has to be a joke.
Yes, yes, I know that most twoofers are crazy, but if that video is not a joke, twoofers have just been elevated to a new stratosphere of crazy.
A W Smith
8th November 2007, 11:49 PM
What, no furries? That's the worst pron video I've seen all year.
ok heres a safe harmless kitty furry (http://www.rainbowsaber.com/costume/zanbestpose.jpg)
hey some of them are kinda cute!
Ravenwood
9th November 2007, 12:09 AM
They can't. High capacity magazines only carry 90 rounds. Let's see you reload 9 times in one minute. :p
AHEM...:http://www.dndguns.com/shrike.htm
cyclonic
9th November 2007, 12:26 AM
That video has to be a joke.
Yes, yes, I know that most twoofers are crazy, but if that video is not a joke, twoofers have just been elevated to a new stratosphere of crazy.
check out his 9/11 laser weapons video which includes a
"video polygraph" lol.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=OrY2OrL6szw
Plantfoam
9th November 2007, 02:04 AM
check out his 9/11 laser weapons video which includes a
"video polygraph" lol.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=OrY2OrL6szw
Oh man, that laser video is simply intellectual rape. Apparently, a laser hit the towers right before the planes hit, because umm.....I guess a 100 ton high speed jet impact is not sufficient.
It's also rather funny to see how he attacks people leaving negative comments by claiming that they have government IP addresses.
cyclonic
9th November 2007, 04:20 AM
omg, he is so smart! see his latest comment on his laser weapons video:
"Anyone who goes to a Physciatrist needs their head examined."
Sabrina
9th November 2007, 07:59 AM
"Physciatrist"?
I know, I know; it's a horrible typo, but it made me think of a physicist and a psychiatrist all rolled up into one, and then my head exploded from the paradox of combining those two fields. *LOL*
Speaking from experience on firing an M-16 (qualified sharpshooter last time I fired, before the whole profile thing that says I can't wear my gear, much less carry my danged weapon) it's almost impossible to eject the mag and reload in less than five-seven seconds. You can fire pretty fast, especially if you use the "burst" versus "semi" selection on the safety switch, but changing the magazine takes time. There ain't no way in H-E-double-hockeysticks that you could EVER fire an M-16 900 times in a minute. I fired in a simulator during my last drill, come to think of it, where I had to "reload" several times (we were using actual modified weapons in the simulator), and I never could reload faster than seven seconds. Maybe he was thinking of an M-249, not an M-16?
rcronk
9th November 2007, 09:11 AM
Has anyone done any research on the effects and link between of pot-induced paranoia and the population of truthers? I'm just saying... And this isn't ad hominem, I really think there may be a link, because I can't think of any other explanation. Perhaps I'm arguing from incredulity.
Kiosk
9th November 2007, 10:38 AM
Has anyone done any research on the effects and link between of pot-induced paranoia and the population of truthers? I'm just saying... And this isn't ad hominem, I really think there may be a link, because I can't think of any other explanation. Perhaps I'm arguing from incredulity.
Discussion of that here. (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=98173) General consensus, amid the disagreement: if you're going to come out with stupid like this, you probably have to be an idiot before you pick up the bong.
SpaceMonkeyZero
9th November 2007, 10:44 AM
Where's teh Micro Machines guy when you need him to debunk Judy Wood?
BenBurch
9th November 2007, 10:46 AM
Please, everyone, offer up a big round of clapping for the dumbest troofer video I've ever seen.
:bigclap
BenBurch
9th November 2007, 10:47 AM
Has anyone done any research on the effects and link between of pot-induced paranoia and the population of truthers? I'm just saying... And this isn't ad hominem, I really think there may be a link, because I can't think of any other explanation. Perhaps I'm arguing from incredulity.
I think we beat that to death a few days ago. There appear to be as many skeptic potheads as truther potheads, but its generally agreed we have the best stash here.
BenBurch
9th November 2007, 10:49 AM
Had to back down after my experiments with the MOAC (Mother Of All Clips, 900 rds) melted the barrel! But then I had to argue fire melting steel! I just can't win.:rolleyes:
Water jackets, my friend. Water jackets.
BenBurch
9th November 2007, 10:52 AM
Just watched the video again. Fear of guys like Ken is why I didn't go to massage therapy school.
An ex sweetie of mine has a massage therapy school here in Chicago... She won't go all truther on you, but she will ladle out the Wicca-woo.
SpaceMonkeyZero
9th November 2007, 10:58 AM
Where's teh Micro Machines guy when you need him to debunk Judy Wood?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Moschitta%2C_Jr.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.