pomeroo
10th November 2007, 01:22 PM
Chillzero offered an excellent suggestion. She advised me to try again and make the point of the thread more precise. I have her permission to mention our discussion to prevent someone from reporting this new thread as spam.
Yesterday, I posted an e-mail exchange between David Griffin and me, commenting that "it speaks for itself." I was being lazy. It speaks for itself only if you are familiar with my dealings with Griffin up to the September 4 e-mail. The people who argued from the start that he would never submit to a serious interview deserve the opportunity to say "I-told-you-so."
Here, I want to contend that in ducking out Griffin clearly reneged on an agreement. More importantly, I want his followers to come to terms with his unwillingness to defend views that he peddles to them for twenty bucks a book.
Yesterday, I posted an e-mail exchange between David Griffin and me, commenting that "it speaks for itself." I was being lazy. It speaks for itself only if you are familiar with my dealings with Griffin up to the September 4 e-mail. The people who argued from the start that he would never submit to a serious interview deserve the opportunity to say "I-told-you-so."
Here, I want to contend that in ducking out Griffin clearly reneged on an agreement. More importantly, I want his followers to come to terms with his unwillingness to defend views that he peddles to them for twenty bucks a book.