View Full Version : Why did the US stop the 24 Brits from blowing up those airliners?
Undesired Walrus
18th November 2007, 02:24 PM
Do you remember in 2006 when there was that massive liquid bomb plot? They arrested 24 people from London and surrounding areas from carrying out attacks which would have been far bigger than 9/11. Just think of all the lovely laws you could rush through congress!
What was the NWO up to on those days?
jhunter1163
18th November 2007, 02:27 PM
This is a good point. Even if they'd only stopped most of them, allowing one or two to get blown up, they'd have justification for a whole new round of civil liberty violations. But they screwed up and stopped the plot.
Damn that NWO, can't seem to get anything right.
Horatius
18th November 2007, 02:31 PM
What was the NWO up to on those days?
Damage control.
All our, "9/11 made them look like incompetent idiots" arguments really hit home, so they had to waste a whole false-flag attack just to make themselves look better.
Now don't you feel guilty, you evil JERFer, you!
Big Les
18th November 2007, 02:33 PM
Interesting point. But I don't know about it being worse than 9/11. Several commentators (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/) were sceptical that the binary liquid weapons would have been viable in any case. It seemed to me to be amateur hour, handily stopped by the intelligence community but then used for serious brownie points by the authorities - "look what we did! We aren't a total waste of space after all!".
Undesired Walrus
18th November 2007, 02:36 PM
Trial starts in January...
Half of London is going to be behind bars at this rate!
jhunter1163
18th November 2007, 02:40 PM
Interesting point. But I don't know about it being worse than 9/11. Several commentators (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/) were sceptical that the binary liquid weapons would have been viable in any case. It seemed to me to be amateur hour, handily stopped by the intelligence community but then used for serious brownie points by the authorities - "look what we did! We aren't a total waste of space after all!".
Perhaps, but if you wanted to justify action against Iran, say, all you would have needed to do was let one work and posit some phony link with the Iranians. But that didn't happen; it was stopped before any of them made it onto planes.
If you're going to have a false flag operation, shouldn't you at least have something bad happen?
GreNME
18th November 2007, 03:37 PM
Err... how many of those 24 did they let go without charge? How many actually made it to court? Are any of them still being held?
njslim
18th November 2007, 06:50 PM
New book - THE TERROSIST WATCH by Ronald Kessler goes into efforts by FBI, CIA, MI5
to foil terrorist plots around the world. Skimmed through copy last night in book store
Goes into detail about airline plot. Another good source is British magazine EYE SPY
which covers intelligence operations.
http://www.amazon.com/Terrorist-Watch-Inside-Desperate-Attack/dp/0307382133
chillzero
19th November 2007, 02:38 AM
I thought that the conspiracy was to stop the British public feeling secure - to invoke fear, and ensure that security was clamped down further; disrupting travel plans, allowing luggage to be checked more thoroughly, etc...
Bell
19th November 2007, 02:44 AM
I thought that the conspiracy was to stop the British public feeling secure - to invoke fear, and ensure that security was clamped down further; disrupting travel plans, allowing luggage to be checked more thoroughly, etc...
Even my mother thought that! :rolleyes:
Either the gubmint let/made the attacks happen (ie 9/11) or they stop it, and both MOs are meant to instill fear. Those nutty CTs can't loose.
Big Les
19th November 2007, 04:50 AM
It's just like all the other CTs. People mistake governmental (with the emphasis on "mental") incompetence and the subsequent damage-limitation/making of political mileage, for deliberate false-flag. The former happens all the time, the latter - not so much (if at all). The irony is that all the attention given to the CT is less attention given to the cock-ups and cover-ups that the government(s) might actually be committing.
What if CTs are the real CT? I think my brain just exploded.
uk_dave
19th November 2007, 05:30 AM
What if CTs are the real CT? I think my brain just exploded.
You mean the 911 ct is just a ruse to divert the incisive, investigatory powers of the typical 'truther' from discovering the real corruption and cock-ups in government?
Seriously?
They need a distraction? 'Truthers'? Ha!..hahaha.....hahahahahahahaha...
.......
..................
:dl:
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.