IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » Links Directory » Conspiracy Theory - Useful Links » Resources for debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Categories   2.2.9

 
Comments/ratings
5 * LashL 27th November 2006 08:34 PM
This is an invaluable guide to recognizing and debunking the numerous lies and misrepresentations in the Loose Change videos that some may not recognize when they first watch them.

Line by line, sentence by sentence, this guide presents facts and evidence, both of which are sorely lacking in the LC videos, and exposes the reality of the lies and misrepresentations that LC tries to fool its viewers with.

Anyone who is inclined to watch loose change should watch it with this guide at hand. That's the surest and quickest way to comprehend how wrong (deliberately wrong) the lc video gets every salient point upon which it touches.
1 * popscythe 6th December 2009 10:16 PM
This guide is an utter piece of trash. The author quickly expresses his lack of desire to present contradictory evidence in favor of "clever" jibes and continues that trend throughout the document.

I reviewed this guide (and more to the point, this website) with the hopes of finding good, SCIENTIFIC refutations of conspiracy theory. This document is neither good, nor scientific. I am especially unenthusiastic regarding the statement by mark roberts that the guide is "To encourage respect for the victims, living and dead, of the 9/11 attacks" when the majority of the guide is "clever" commentary without actual refutation. A very poor job.

Please do not jump to the conclusion that I support Loose Change instead of this document. I just find this document unprofessional at best and without much competent analysis of the garbage presented in loose change.

 
Sort by

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.