Thread: Loose Change
View Single Post
Old 27th April 2006, 11:16 AM   #1852
FAQ Creator
Beleth's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not in a cave
Posts: 4,135
Originally Posted by geggy View Post
This was controlled demolition, inc's project. The top portion was deliberately brought down with explosives. The bottom portion were cut by workers with charges in order to weaken the structure fdor the top portion to act as a hammer.
This was the beginning of south tower collapse. The dust ring surrounding the towers were excessively high in volumes.
Again, this is an "affirming the precedent" logical fallacy.

You can't compare what the WTC looked like as it fell to what a controlled demolition looks like to conclude that the WTC was a controlled demolition.

You have to compare what the WTC looked like to what an uncontrolled demolition doesn't look like to conclude that the WTC was a controlled demolition.

Otherwise, you end up proving that parakeets are cats because they both have claws on their feet.
Administrator and Head Moderator, The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe Forum
Big Fan, Stop Sylvia Browne
I will come back only after the words "Hi, Nyarl!" are returned to the post .
Beleth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top