JREF Forum - View Single Post - Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

desertyeti · 21st December 2006, 08:08 AM

Originally Posted by Diogenes

Talk about repeatable.. All so called Bigfoot dermals, except where they can be shown to be human contamination, look just like the artifacts Matt duplicated.

Of course it could just be a coincidence ..

Yep!
I've made them in dry sand, on moist sand, on dry silt, and even dry mud. All it takes is some sort of dessicant in the matrix. This can be elevated salinity, or mineralogical composition as is the case when certain clay minerals like illite or kaolinite or smectite are present, or simply degree of dry-ness of the matrix. Very repeatable and very open-and-shut. The Onion Mtn. and other casts listed above show dessication, not dermals...case closed.

On to the Patterson Film!

21st December 2006, 08:08 AM	#5059
desertyeti Muse Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: down by the river Posts: 834	Originally Posted by Diogenes Talk about repeatable.. All so called Bigfoot dermals, except where they can be shown to be human contamination, look just like the artifacts Matt duplicated. Of course it could just be a coincidence .. Yep! I've made them in dry sand, on moist sand, on dry silt, and even dry mud. All it takes is some sort of dessicant in the matrix. This can be elevated salinity, or mineralogical composition as is the case when certain clay minerals like illite or kaolinite or smectite are present, or simply degree of dry-ness of the matrix. Very repeatable and very open-and-shut. The Onion Mtn. and other casts listed above show dessication, not dermals...case closed. On to the Patterson Film!