JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » JREF Topics » Latest Commentary Issues
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags natural , selection , side

Reply
Old 12th October 2006, 12:42 PM   #41
Orb
Dust Mote
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Posts: 324
Originally Posted by rjh01 View Post
I like the two answers above. Which leads to the next question - what is the future of religion in the USA?

(I have no answers myself)
Oprahism
Orb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th October 2006, 12:57 PM   #42
John Hewitt
Muse
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 924
I really have just two comments really. First, it seems to be a fact that our ancestry has become very much more intelligent over the past few million years by a mechanism of sexual selection. There is no reason to expect that to stop soon and, by current measures our IQ is rising by 3 points per decade. I believe this is called the Flynn effect.

Whether or not you believe any particular religion, religion as a general phenomenon is something that seems to be in our makeup. So America is likely to remain religious and those few parts of the world that are presently faithless are likely to rejoin some faithful flock or other.
John Hewitt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th October 2006, 09:15 PM   #43
Skeptic Ginger
formerly skeptigirl
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shifting through paradigms
Posts: 40,799
It may depend on the time frame you look at, John. I don't think many people still believe Zeus throws lightning bolts around. I see the current Evangelical movement as still within a two steps forward one step back (guess which direction we are going ) type of cyclical trend. If you look back in history, religion has had many a revival but advances in science have not really been stopped, and they would almost have to stop for the human race to embrace religion totally.

This may be a frustrating time for the science crowd, but I certainly don't think it is anything permanent. After all, even the Jerry Falwells, Pat Robertsons, and the Ralph Reeds are likely to pray but still go to the hospital for the latest science can offer them should they need it. They may be too stupid to realize the same genetic research that resulted in the latest cancer treatment required evolutionary theory as its base, but when push comes to shove, do you think they would turn that treatment down if they needed it?

Stem cell research has resulted in breaking ranks and global warming and pollution have as well when those Evangelicals begin to suffer the consequences personally of their anti-science positions. Denial only goes so far before reality interferes.
__________________
(*Tired of continuing to hear the "Democrat Party" repeatedly I've decided to adopt the name, Pubbie Party, Repubs "Republics" and Republic Party in response.)
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th October 2006, 07:56 AM   #44
Crowbot
Thinker
 
Crowbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by Dave1001 View Post
I am really looking forward to seeing the movie Idiocracy.
A dark disturbing look at America that parallels my own life.
__________________
I've noticed that there are two types of applicants; those who cannot do what they claim and those who cannot claim what they do.
Crowbot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th October 2006, 02:48 PM   #45
JackPT
Scholar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
There exists right now an extensive and powerful global community that puts everyone in touch, enables almost-instantaneous transfer of data and ideas, and forces reality on us all. It’s getting harder to be a fool. Those religious zealots who choose to mumble against progress, cannot long prevail; their days are numbered by simple Darwinian selection, though we might wish it were a faster process.

I took James Randi to mean that the zealots can no longer isolate their flocks. Some of the high profile ex-Scientology people were liberated by their exposure to information on the Internet that ran counter to doctrine. I'm sure many of the woo-woos that troll posts here are actually curious about views that oppose them. Which is a start. I don't think James Randi was talking about woo-woos being numbered in general, rather specifically those that try to shut out the truth. Whether the truth has any impact is a different matter.
JackPT is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th October 2006, 12:48 AM   #46
AgingYoung
Muse
 
AgingYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 973
Quote:
The USA is still a young country.
What country on earth is there that has an older form of government than America?

Gene

edit: the 1800 Act of Union included Ireland under the Parliament of the United Kingdom. That was 24 years after America declared it's independance.

Turkish Empire, existed from 1299 AD to 1923 AD. The boundries of the middle east were carved out of that.
__________________
If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?

Last edited by AgingYoung; 20th October 2006 at 12:57 AM.
AgingYoung is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » JREF Topics » Latest Commentary Issues

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.