Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal of Microchopped Population - Page 2

Alt+F4 · 1st February 2007, 06:43 PM

Originally Posted by ktesibios

...if you Google "Nick Rockefeller", you come up with multiple pages of conspiracist cybermetastasis of Russo's claim.

Very true. There is NO evidence that the Nick Rockefeller Russo refers to is a member of the John D. Rockefeller family.

T.A.M. · 1st February 2007, 07:12 PM

The only question worth asking on this is...

Which one is lieing? Paul Watson (likely)? Russo (very likely)? Nick Rockefeller (possible, but likely not)?

TAM

WildCat · 1st February 2007, 07:43 PM

I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats.

JonnyFive · 2nd February 2007, 06:36 AM

Originally Posted by WildCat

I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats.

But you wouldn't want them to have kittens.

We had our new cat microchopped a couple months ago. They took her little cat ovaries and now she doesn't pee on the bed anymore.

JonathanClement · 6th August 2008, 02:03 AM

http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/

Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.

TimB1 · 6th August 2008, 02:11 AM

Originally Posted by Firestone

And can he just do it? Is this covered by free speech, or can Nick Rockefeller sue him for this? (Theoretically speaking, I guess that Rockefeller will not sue a nobody like Russo.)

My understanding is that you can't sue dead people - certainly that's how it is in the UK, don't know about elsewhere.

JonnyFive · 6th August 2008, 05:32 AM

Originally Posted by JonathanClement

http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/

Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.

Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah...

Originally Posted by Whois lookup

Registrant:
Zaba, Inc.

2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: NICHOLASROCKEFELLER.NET
Created on: 13-Mar-07
Expires on: 13-Mar-09
Last Updated on: 13-Mar-08

Administrative Contact:
Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com
Zaba, Inc.
2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States
(310) 691-2373

Technical Contact:
Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com
Zaba, Inc.
2828 Cochran St.
Suite 397
Semi Valley, California 93065
United States
(310) 691-2373

Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org which is listed as "another" site on the .net.

However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California."

Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection?

Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up?

Alt+F4 · 7th August 2008, 12:45 AM

Originally Posted by JonathanClement

http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/

Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.

I saw no evidence on that page that the person in question in a member of the John D. Rockefeller family. Anyone put a link to John D. Rockefeller on a website.

Blender Head · 7th August 2008, 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah...

Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org which is listed as "another" site on the .net.

However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California."

Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection?

Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up?

Funny, that site went up less than a few months after the late Russo's PP article.

dudalb · 7th August 2008, 12:10 PM

Did Rockerfeller hire Jarvis Twitch, aka "The Mad Hatter" to design his mind control chips?
IF so, someone tell Batman, for Heaven's sake.
At times I really think CTers take a LOT of their theories from Comic Books.

JonathanClement · 7th August 2008, 01:42 PM

Not mind controll. "Tracking chips".

boloboffin · 7th August 2008, 08:44 PM

Nick Rockefeller? I thought it was Julian Rockefeller that wanted to microchop everybody.

albie · 8th August 2008, 02:52 AM

So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying.

albie · 8th August 2008, 03:02 AM

"it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model."

I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents.
Can't say that I love the state though.
Nor do most people.

I suppose they are talking about nursery school. Who could afford that?

JonnyFive · 8th August 2008, 07:21 AM

Originally Posted by albie

So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying.

Other than the fact that no evidence seems to exist to verify what he says, and all the "evidence" shown seems to lead in a circle back to various non-authorities, and the fact that nobody can even verify that Nicholas Rockefeller is even who Russo says he is...

No, other than those things I guess we can't discredit Russo. Like, Russo hasn't actually said "yeah, all that stuff I said was a load of crap."

Still, he's pretty much batting 0.000 here.

Well, maybe 0.010 since there does seem to actually be a "Nicholas Rockefeller" somewhere out there.

JonnyFive · 8th August 2008, 07:23 AM

Originally Posted by albie

"it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model."

I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents.

Eh? I don't recall any of my schooling being designed to indoctrinate me into accepting the state as anything.

Beerina · 8th August 2008, 10:56 AM

Originally Posted by stateofgrace

And what,exactly,is wrong with microchip implants?

Ehhh, only if you like ultra-gorgeous females with huge lips, long blonde hair, and magnificent, curvy hips who are physically strong enough to throw you around and do what they want with you.

...if you are lucky.

I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101.

That free society economics supports growing a population over the long-term faddish prudery with respect to it really relegates this thought to full-blown woo-woo-ism, both from the CT aspect of it, and the eco-nut aspect of it.

Cuddles · 15th August 2008, 06:26 AM

Originally Posted by Beerina

I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101.

To be fair, shrinking your neighbouring populations would work just as well. Which is presumably why we see the populations of rivals like China and India shrinking so quickly that they are well on their way to becoming the least populous countries in the world. Or something.

Confuseling · 15th August 2008, 07:52 AM

Originally Posted by jhunter1163

There's a setting for "microchop" on my Cuisinart, right next to "frappe". I must have gotten one of the NWO models.

My microwave has a button on it labelled "Chaos defrost". Honestly.

I'm too frightened to press it.

INRM · 17th August 2008, 10:21 AM

Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?

I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?

INRM

Jontg · 17th August 2008, 12:09 PM

They can't--an RFID chip doesn't do that. All it does is verify that the bill is genuine.

Foolmewunz · 17th August 2008, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by INRM

Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?

I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?

INRM

Alex? Alex? Is that you?

That's Prison Planet type gold, that is. RFID can be active or passive. To actively track every bill in circulation would probably cost more than those bills are worth.

"Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells."

ktesibios · 17th August 2008, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Foolmewunz

Alex? Alex? Is that you?
"Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells."

Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads.

JonnyFive · 18th August 2008, 06:59 AM

Originally Posted by INRM

Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money?

I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this?

INRM

I know like three people beat me to it, but RFID chips don't work like that. An active RFID chip requires a power supply to actively transmit, and even so would be limited in range. A long-range transmitter of the type needed to track someone would require a power supply and antenna a bit larger than would conventionally fit into, say, a dollar bill.

The RFID chips being discussed are similar to those you might find a in DVD movie in a store. It will respond to a particular signal within a very short range to allow for bill verification. Any claims of global RFID tracking networks are pure hooey - it simply isn't physically possible with a device that small.

I suppose you could develop an immense network of passive RFID reading stations. You'd need one every thirty feet or so in order to read the RFID tags, and you'd need a way to uniquely identify and track every single piece of money in circulation.

Did I mention that a moderately strong magnet will fry the RFID circuit?

Billdave2 · 18th August 2008, 08:48 AM

Originally Posted by ktesibios

Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads.

That lightweight junk? you should do what I do, I have all my assets in these.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones

abenja1 · 18th August 2008, 02:26 PM

Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence.

JonnyFive · 19th August 2008, 05:28 AM

Originally Posted by abenja1

Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence.

The government microwave death rays destroyed all his film, I'm sure.

1st February 2007, 06:43 PM	#41
Alt+F4 diabolical globalist Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Department of Abandoned Places Posts: 9,780	Originally Posted by ktesibios ...if you Google "Nick Rockefeller", you come up with multiple pages of conspiracist cybermetastasis of Russo's claim. Very true. There is NO evidence that the Nick Rockefeller Russo refers to is a member of the John D. Rockefeller family.
	__________________ "My folks touched a lot of kids." - Jerry Sandusky

2nd February 2007, 06:36 AM	#44
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by WildCat I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats. But you wouldn't want them to have kittens. We had our new cat microchopped a couple months ago. They took her little cat ovaries and now she doesn't pee on the bed anymore.
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

6th August 2008, 02:03 AM	#45
JonathanClement Thinker Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 210	http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/ Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family.
JonathanClement Thinker Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 210

6th August 2008, 02:11 AM	#46
TimB1 Student Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 37	Originally Posted by Firestone And can he just do it? Is this covered by free speech, or can Nick Rockefeller sue him for this? (Theoretically speaking, I guess that Rockefeller will not sue a nobody like Russo.) My understanding is that you can't sue dead people - certainly that's how it is in the UK, don't know about elsewhere.
TimB1 Student Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 37

6th August 2008, 05:32 AM	#47
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by JonathanClement http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/ Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family. Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah... Originally Posted by Whois lookup Registrant: Zaba, Inc. 2828 Cochran St. Suite 397 Semi Valley, California 93065 United States Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: NICHOLASROCKEFELLER.NET Created on: 13-Mar-07 Expires on: 13-Mar-09 Last Updated on: 13-Mar-08 Administrative Contact: Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com Zaba, Inc. 2828 Cochran St. Suite 397 Semi Valley, California 93065 United States (310) 691-2373 Technical Contact: Zakari, Robert domain.admin@zabasearch.com Zaba, Inc. 2828 Cochran St. Suite 397 Semi Valley, California 93065 United States (310) 691-2373 Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org which is listed as "another" site on the .net. However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California." Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection? Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up?
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al. Last edited by JonnyFive; 6th August 2008 at 05:36 AM.

1st February 2007, 07:12 PM	#42
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	The only question worth asking on this is... Which one is lieing? Paul Watson (likely)? Russo (very likely)? Nick Rockefeller (possible, but likely not)? TAM

1st February 2007, 07:43 PM	#43
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Albany Park, Chicago Posts: 49,053	I had one of my cats microchipped last week, but I would never, ever microchop one of my cats.

7th August 2008, 12:45 AM	#48
Alt+F4 diabolical globalist Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Department of Abandoned Places Posts: 9,780	Originally Posted by JonathanClement http://www.nicholasrockefeller.net/ Got this... Looks like Nick Rockefeller IS on the CFR and from what I can tell, IS in the John D. Rockefeller family. I saw no evidence on that page that the person in question in a member of the John D. Rockefeller family. Anyone put a link to John D. Rockefeller on a website.
	__________________ "My folks touched a lot of kids." - Jerry Sandusky

7th August 2008, 08:17 AM	#49
Blender Head Muse Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 682	Originally Posted by JonnyFive Yeah... not that I'm saying that website isn't a reliable source of information or anything but... yeah... Interestingly enough, this is also the registration info for www.nicholasrockefeller.org which is listed as "another" site on the .net. However, they did in fact link to a NY Times article that confirms that yes, Nicholas is "a lawyer in California." Anyone got a good CFR source for this threads glorious ressurrection? Edit: Also, searching the CFR website gets 0 matches on that name. That is zero, as in "none." Anyone got confirmation on his membership besides some random website that some guy set up? Funny, that site went up less than a few months after the late Russo's PP article.
Blender Head Muse Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 682	__________________ "As you know, Bush never attempted to link Saddam to the 9/11 attacks." -Ron Wieck "The only way for there to be no conspiracy is for nothing to exist." -Travis [DRG] is a follower of Jesus Christ and the Truth, so I will follow St. Griffin as well in this regard. -Galileo

7th August 2008, 12:10 PM	#50
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,843	Did Rockerfeller hire Jarvis Twitch, aka "The Mad Hatter" to design his mind control chips? IF so, someone tell Batman, for Heaven's sake. At times I really think CTers take a LOT of their theories from Comic Books.

7th August 2008, 01:42 PM	#51
JonathanClement Thinker Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 210	Not mind controll. "Tracking chips".
JonathanClement Thinker Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 210

7th August 2008, 08:44 PM	#52
boloboffin Guest Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 5,001	Nick Rockefeller? I thought it was Julian Rockefeller that wanted to microchop everybody.

8th August 2008, 02:52 AM	#53
albie Scholar Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 79	So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying.
albie Scholar Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 79

8th August 2008, 03:02 AM	#54
albie Scholar Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 79	"it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model." I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents. Can't say that I love the state though. Nor do most people. I suppose they are talking about nursery school. Who could afford that?
albie Scholar Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 79	Last edited by albie; 8th August 2008 at 03:05 AM.

8th August 2008, 07:21 AM	#55
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by albie So we cannot actually discredit Russo with this? I suppose we'll just have to hope he was crazy or lying. Other than the fact that no evidence seems to exist to verify what he says, and all the "evidence" shown seems to lead in a circle back to various non-authorities, and the fact that nobody can even verify that Nicholas Rockefeller is even who Russo says he is... No, other than those things I guess we can't discredit Russo. Like, Russo hasn't actually said "yeah, all that stuff I said was a load of crap." Still, he's pretty much batting 0.000 here. Well, maybe 0.010 since there does seem to actually be a "Nicholas Rockefeller" somewhere out there.
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

8th August 2008, 07:23 AM	#56
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by albie "it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model." I've got to admit that does make some sense. Maybe I just hate my parents. Eh? I don't recall any of my schooling being designed to indoctrinate me into accepting the state as anything.
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

8th August 2008, 10:56 AM	#57
Beerina Sarcastic Conqueror of Notions Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: A floating island above the clouds Posts: 23,835	Originally Posted by stateofgrace And what,exactly,is wrong with microchip implants? Ehhh, only if you like ultra-gorgeous females with huge lips, long blonde hair, and magnificent, curvy hips who are physically strong enough to throw you around and do what they want with you. ...if you are lucky. I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101. That free society economics supports growing a population over the long-term faddish prudery with respect to it really relegates this thought to full-blown woo-woo-ism, both from the CT aspect of it, and the eco-nut aspect of it.
	__________________ "Great innovations should not be forced [by way of] slender majorities." - Thomas Jefferson The government should nationalize it! Socialized, single-payer video game development and sales *now!* More, cheaper, better games, right? Right?

15th August 2008, 06:26 AM	#58
Cuddles Decoy Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land full of pink fluffy sheeps and bunnies Posts: 16,586	Originally Posted by Beerina I do note the CT nature of this with the "population reduction" issue. Anybody power-hungry person knows you need to grow your population to keep ahead of the neighboring rulers. That's part of Evil Mastermind 101. To be fair, shrinking your neighbouring populations would work just as well. Which is presumably why we see the populations of rivals like China and India shrinking so quickly that they are well on their way to becoming the least populous countries in the world. Or something.
	__________________ I am not a little teapot.

15th August 2008, 07:52 AM	#59
Confuseling Irreligious fanatic Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,243	Originally Posted by jhunter1163 There's a setting for "microchop" on my Cuisinart, right next to "frappe". I must have gotten one of the NWO models. My microwave has a button on it labelled "Chaos defrost". Honestly. I'm too frightened to press it.
	__________________ Drs_Res: "P.S. You have a right to free speech, but you don't have a right to be listened to." link Join my petition. Fight the vile slurp spider scourge. Harass Darat. Can you afford not to?

17th August 2008, 10:21 AM	#60
INRM Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 5,490	Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money? I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this? INRM
INRM Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 5,490

17th August 2008, 12:09 PM	#61
Jontg The Bear Skeptic Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: A world of kindling. Posts: 926	They can't--an RFID chip doesn't do that. All it does is verify that the bill is genuine.
	__________________ All that is sacred must burn.

17th August 2008, 04:21 PM	#62
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,520	Originally Posted by INRM Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money? I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this? INRM Alex? Alex? Is that you? That's Prison Planet type gold, that is. RFID can be active or passive. To actively track every bill in circulation would probably cost more than those bills are worth. "Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells."
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

17th August 2008, 05:33 PM	#63
ktesibios Worthless Aging Hippie Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,493	Originally Posted by Foolmewunz Alex? Alex? Is that you? "Yeah, that's why I don't use government issued currency, loyal listeners. I trade in pookah shells." Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads.
	__________________ Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst, where there ain't no ten commandments and a man can raise a small, bristly mustache.

18th August 2008, 06:59 AM	#64
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by INRM Isn't that a serious problem, having RFID chips in money? I know counterfeiting is a b*tch, but I don't think it's right for the government to be able to track every single dollar moving throughout the country. Why does the government need to know this? INRM I know like three people beat me to it, but RFID chips don't work like that. An active RFID chip requires a power supply to actively transmit, and even so would be limited in range. A long-range transmitter of the type needed to track someone would require a power supply and antenna a bit larger than would conventionally fit into, say, a dollar bill. The RFID chips being discussed are similar to those you might find a in DVD movie in a store. It will respond to a particular signal within a very short range to allow for bill verification. Any claims of global RFID tracking networks are pure hooey - it simply isn't physically possible with a device that small. I suppose you could develop an immense network of passive RFID reading stations. You'd need one every thirty feet or so in order to read the RFID tags, and you'd need a way to uniquely identify and track every single piece of money in circulation. Did I mention that a moderately strong magnet will fry the RFID circuit?
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

18th August 2008, 08:48 AM	#65
Billdave2 Muse Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Anderson, South Carolina Posts: 591	Originally Posted by ktesibios Feh. Real paranoids keep their assets in Flainian Pobble Beads. That lightweight junk? you should do what I do, I have all my assets in these. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones
	__________________ “Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.” -Winston Churchill "Universal affirmatives can only be partially converted: all of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan." - A Professional Logician

18th August 2008, 02:26 PM	#66
abenja1 Muse Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 780	Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence.
abenja1 Muse Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 780	__________________ My Blog: http://andrews-views.blogspot.com/ JihadJane actually thinks its okay for truthers to call for the murder of people they disagree with. 911-Investigator believes that Jews should have no rights of any kind, even those dictated by the Constitution.

19th August 2008, 05:28 AM	#67
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by abenja1 Of course Aaron Russo, being in the film industry should know that recording something on film could be used as evidence. The government microwave death rays destroyed all his film, I'm sure.
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.