evidence against flight 93 shoot down - Page 13

Jonnyclueless · 10th September 2008, 06:46 PM

"Come on people, get on board the modified explodable plane, no asking questions..."

Bobert · 10th September 2008, 06:49 PM

Everytime the host asks Dom a question where he would have to supply facts he responds "well I talked to this guy......"

beachnut · 10th September 2008, 06:50 PM

Originally Posted by Bobert

WOW!
According to Dom he "knows for a fact" that the white plane was at the crash site because a witness told him this.

The white plane was there, it was a Falcon 20. Sad, TC says the pilot is a liar.

Funny stuff, big white plane, small white plane.

Close, far.

TC is not very good!

Dom, and Domer ideas.

PhantomWolf · 10th September 2008, 06:50 PM

It depends on if you think of "Blah Blah Blah" as "Blah+Blah+Blah" or "Blah.Blah.Blah"

Jonnyclueless · 10th September 2008, 06:54 PM

Every time a crackpot says "doomsday plane" a clown gets his nose.

Bobert · 10th September 2008, 07:01 PM

"What do you think happened?"
Dom then goes on to say how a majority of people who he has spoken with say it was shot down.
And of course he goes on about how the passengers revolted so they had to shoot it down.
Suuuuuuuure Dom!

Ok now the host is talking about holograms.
Dom is soooo desparate that he needs to embrace the space beamers and hologramers.
Koo Koo Koo Koo
Time to go.

WildCat · 10th September 2008, 07:01 PM

Originally Posted by beachnut

Little white plane. A window.

Oh, I missed it! Did Dom really say the little plane that flew under the wires had a window?! Who the hell was piloting it, Lilliputians?

WildCat · 10th September 2008, 07:04 PM

Originally Posted by Bobert

"What do you think happened?"
Dom then goes on to say how a majority of people who he has spoken with say it was shot down.
And of course he goes on about how the passengers revolted so they had to shoot it down.
Suuuuuuuure Dom!

I still don't see how this makes any sense. If the plane had actual hijackers under the control of the government, they could have just crashed it. If it was remote-controlled, it would be unaffected by the passenger revolt. So why a shoot-down?

This doesn't make any sense at all!

Crazytimes · 11th September 2008, 07:28 AM

Originally Posted by WildCat

I still don't see how this makes any sense. If the plane had actual hijackers under the control of the government, they could have just crashed it. If it was remote-controlled, it would be unaffected by the passenger revolt. So why a shoot-down?

This doesn't make any sense at all!

Not only that, why didnt they have the plane hit a target like the rest of them ? Why not admit they shot it down to prevent it from hitting a target.

These nutjobs cannot connect the dots on their theories.

Disbelief · 15th September 2008, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by TC329

somehow 100tons disappeared into an 8 foot deep hole and it didn't even displace the appropriate amount of dirt to accomodate it. weird, huh?

Dom, are you ever going to show your math for this claim? Do you need help?

Your parameters so far are:

length = 20 ft
depth = 8 ft
width = ???

So, since you can't seem to solve this, how about some assistance:

We will assume the width as 8 ft also, though all of your numbers appear lower than the published info, including from your buddy Killtown's site.

20ft*8ft*8ft=1280 ft^3
1280ft^3*100 lbs/ft^3 (average weight of one cubic foot of dirt)=128000 lbs
128000 lbs / 2000 lbs = 64 tons

So, since you stated that at least 50 tons would have to be displaced, your numbers show that the correct amount of dirt was displaced. However, if we use more realistic parameters based on published reports (though erring on the conservative side), we have:

length = 30 ft (published reports say 30-40)
width = 10 ft (published reports say 15)
depth = 8 ft (published reports say 18)

30*10*8 = 2400 cubic feet
2400*100/2000= 120 tons

So, where is your math showing that an incorrect amount of dirt was displaced?

10th September 2008, 06:49 PM	#482
Bobert Government Loyalist Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Kennesaw GA Posts: 4,146	Everytime the host asks Dom a question where he would have to supply facts he responds "well I talked to this guy......"
	__________________ CIT CULT founder Ranke responding to where Flight 77 is"I'm not aware of any "theories" nor am I interested in theorizing about what method was used to murder them ." CIT CULT MEMEMBER ROUNDHEAD Suck on one weenie, you are a weenie sucker for life CIT CULT founder Aldo Marquis :You're going to regret. Don't forget we have your info too pal. Think about your kid and family

10th September 2008, 06:50 PM	#484
PhantomWolf Philosopher Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base Posts: 9,962	It depends on if you think of "Blah Blah Blah" as "Blah+Blah+Blah" or "Blah.Blah.Blah"
	__________________ It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My Apollo Page. 1 on 1 Debating Forum for Skeptics and sceptics.

10th September 2008, 07:01 PM	#486
Bobert Government Loyalist Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Kennesaw GA Posts: 4,146	"What do you think happened?" Dom then goes on to say how a majority of people who he has spoken with say it was shot down. And of course he goes on about how the passengers revolted so they had to shoot it down. Suuuuuuuure Dom! Ok now the host is talking about holograms. Dom is soooo desparate that he needs to embrace the space beamers and hologramers. Koo Koo Koo Koo Time to go.
	__________________ CIT CULT founder Ranke responding to where Flight 77 is"I'm not aware of any "theories" nor am I interested in theorizing about what method was used to murder them ." CIT CULT MEMEMBER ROUNDHEAD Suck on one weenie, you are a weenie sucker for life CIT CULT founder Aldo Marquis :You're going to regret. Don't forget we have your info too pal. Think about your kid and family

15th September 2008, 09:00 AM	#490
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	Originally Posted by TC329 somehow 100tons disappeared into an 8 foot deep hole and it didn't even displace the appropriate amount of dirt to accomodate it. weird, huh? Dom, are you ever going to show your math for this claim? Do you need help? Your parameters so far are: length = 20 ft depth = 8 ft width = ??? So, since you can't seem to solve this, how about some assistance: We will assume the width as 8 ft also, though all of your numbers appear lower than the published info, including from your buddy Killtown's site. 20ft8ft8ft=1280 ft^3 1280ft^3100 lbs/ft^3 (average weight of one cubic foot of dirt)=128000 lbs 128000 lbs / 2000 lbs = 64 tons So, since you stated that at least 50 tons would have to be displaced, your numbers show that the correct amount of dirt was displaced. However, if we use more realistic parameters based on published reports (though erring on the conservative side), we have: length = 30 ft (published reports say 30-40) width = 10 ft (published reports say 15) depth = 8 ft (published reports say 18) 30108 = 2400 cubic feet 2400100/2000= 120 tons So, where is your math showing that an incorrect amount of dirt was displaced?
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	__________________ Zensmack (LastChild, Laughing Assassin, RazetheFlag, Wastrel, TruthbyDecree) - Working his way up the sock puppet chain, trying to overtake P'Doh. Or, are they the same? Quote me where I said conspiracists use evidence. - mchapman

10th September 2008, 06:46 PM	#481
Jonnyclueless Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,360	"Come on people, get on board the modified explodable plane, no asking questions..."

10th September 2008, 06:50 PM	#483
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,902	Originally Posted by Bobert WOW! According to Dom he "knows for a fact" that the white plane was at the crash site because a witness told him this. The white plane was there, it was a Falcon 20. Sad, TC says the pilot is a liar. Funny stuff, big white plane, small white plane. Close, far. TC is not very good! Dom, and Domer ideas.

10th September 2008, 06:54 PM	#485
Jonnyclueless Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,360	Every time a crackpot says "doomsday plane" a clown gets his nose.

10th September 2008, 07:01 PM	#487
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Albany Park, Chicago Posts: 49,102	Originally Posted by beachnut Little white plane. A window. Oh, I missed it! Did Dom really say the little plane that flew under the wires had a window?! Who the hell was piloting it, Lilliputians?

10th September 2008, 07:04 PM	#488
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Albany Park, Chicago Posts: 49,102	Originally Posted by Bobert "What do you think happened?" Dom then goes on to say how a majority of people who he has spoken with say it was shot down. And of course he goes on about how the passengers revolted so they had to shoot it down. Suuuuuuuure Dom! I still don't see how this makes any sense. If the plane had actual hijackers under the control of the government, they could have just crashed it. If it was remote-controlled, it would be unaffected by the passenger revolt. So why a shoot-down? This doesn't make any sense at all!

11th September 2008, 07:28 AM	#489
Crazytimes Critical Thinker Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 348	Originally Posted by WildCat I still don't see how this makes any sense. If the plane had actual hijackers under the control of the government, they could have just crashed it. If it was remote-controlled, it would be unaffected by the passenger revolt. So why a shoot-down? This doesn't make any sense at all! Not only that, why didnt they have the plane hit a target like the rest of them ? Why not admit they shot it down to prevent it from hitting a target. These nutjobs cannot connect the dots on their theories.