Oliver Stone...9-11 Cover-up Conspirator???

Thunder · 14th October 2008, 12:16 PM

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/

seems like the Truthers (or just Marc Dice) is furious at Oliver Stone for nor including any stupid 9-11 conspiracy stuff in his new movie "W".

If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems.

Or maybe his real name...is Oliver Stein? Hmmmmm....

roundhead · 14th October 2008, 12:23 PM

Originally Posted by parky76

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/

seems like the Truthers (or just Marc Dice) is furious at Oliver Stone for nor including any stupid 9-11 conspiracy stuff in his new movie "W".

If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems.

Or maybe his real name...is Oliver Stein? Hmmmmm....

Or perhaps he just was concerned about the movie being allowed in theatres

Drudgewire · 14th October 2008, 12:29 PM

First sentence:

Quote:

Thousands in the 9/11 Truth Movement are angry with Oliver Stone over his new biopic film of George W. Bush, for not producing a 9/11 conspiracy movie similar to his film JFK in 1991.

Would you believe it gets less accurate from there?

Best part is, what with no reference link or anything, it appears to be a press release written by Dice. If that's the case, this is most embarrassingly pathetic case of verbal self-fellating I've seen at least this year.

Thunder · 14th October 2008, 12:34 PM

Is it possible that Marc Dice is like that character in X-Men 3....who can make hundreds or even thousands of copies of himself?

Na....I doubt it. Im sure hundreds if not thousands of Truthers will be out protesting "W".

Mince · 14th October 2008, 12:40 PM

Originally Posted by parky76

If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems.

Especially since Stone reviles W. so much.

dudalb · 14th October 2008, 12:44 PM

I have to agree: When Oliver Stone thinks a conspiracy theory is a bunch of crap, it has to have a level of crappiness that is truly remarkable.

Mince · 14th October 2008, 12:44 PM

Originally Posted by roundhead

Or perhaps he just was concerned about the movie being allowed in theatres

Yeah. An Oliver Stone directed movie not being allowed in theaters.

Sheeeeeeah. Riiiiigggghhhht.

Stone could film himself taking a dump for two hours and it would be "allowed in theaters".

Thunder · 14th October 2008, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by Mince

Yeah. An Oliver Stone directed movie not being allowed in theaters.

Sheeeeeeah. Riiiiigggghhhht.

Stone could film himself taking a dump for two hours and it would be "allowed in theaters".

I have to agree. Done with as much tact and facts and sensitivity as possible, Oliver Stone could very well put a 9-11 conspiracy movie in thousands of theatres across the country.

But, I guess, Oliver Stone is a patriot American and doesn't feel like going down this road.

Drudgewire · 14th October 2008, 01:45 PM

Originally Posted by parky76

I have to agree. Done with as much tact and facts and sensitivity as possible, Oliver Stone could very well put a 9-11 conspiracy movie in thousands of theatres across the country.

Of course, by that standard the movie would be 18 seconds long.

PhantomWolf · 14th October 2008, 03:14 PM

You do remember that Oliver Stone has already done a 9/11 movie?

Drudgewire · 14th October 2008, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by PhantomWolf

You do remember that Oliver Stone has already done a 9/11 movie?

Oh, the suave pick-up artist made sure we didn't forget.

Quote:

Many believe that Stone not only missed the boat on this one, but that he is purposefully avoiding the difficult issues surrounding 9/11, and has now become an accomplice in the 9/11 cover-up. In 2006, Stone directed a film titled World Trade Center, which focused on the rescue of two port authority workers following the attacks, making this new film his second whitewash of Bush and 9/11.

What a douche.

TexasJack · 14th October 2008, 03:50 PM

Apparently Stone used the wrong screenwriters.

"There has GOT to be scripts about this floating around Hollywood. Stone could have gotten Alex Jones, David Ray Griffen, or the Loose Change guys as script consultants, and had a couple of writers knock out a script in a few months"

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/

Drudgewire · 14th October 2008, 03:57 PM

Having read Stone's book (he's awesome. LOVE his 80s and 90s work, even the critically-panned stuff like Any Given Sunday), I really hope Oliver responds to this.

Cuz he'll

ing go OFF on these morons.

Arus808 · 14th October 2008, 04:27 PM

this is a hoot:

Quote:

producing a 9/11 conspiracy movie similar to his film JFK in 1991.

UH NEWS FOR YOU...JFK was a FICTIONAL movie about the conspiracies surrounding the assassination of JFK!

This is when you can tell that these idiots do not know fact from fiction; reality from fantasy.

Drudgewire · 14th October 2008, 04:34 PM

Originally Posted by Arus808

UH NEWS FOR YOU...JFK was a FICTIONAL movie about the conspiracies surrounding the assassination of JFK!

This is when you can tell that these idiots do not know fact from fiction; reality from fantasy.

Years back I took a speech class where someone did his persuasive speech on the JFK assassination. I stopped him in his tracks when his visual aid was not the Zapruder film BUT THE

ING OLIVER STONE VERSION OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM!!

PhantomWolf · 14th October 2008, 05:01 PM

For those that haven't seen it.

100 Errors in JFK movie

dudalb · 14th October 2008, 05:08 PM

I have the same feelings about Oliver Stone and "JFK" I do about Leni Reifensthal and "Triumph Of The Will": a brilliant piece of filmmaking but a total twisting and distorting of the truth.
And on a Non CT note I have issues with the way Stone Blew it with "Alexander". IF there was ever good subject matter for great historical epic it is Alexander the Great; but Stone managed to blow it bigtime. Yesh, a couple of the Battle scenes are great (Gaugamela is incredible) but the film overall is a confused mess.

moon1969 · 14th October 2008, 05:39 PM

Oliver Stone is a joo so of course he was involved with Jack Abramoff and mossad. Those sneaky joo. Even if there are 1.3 billion muslims and only 13-14million jews still them joos are sneak. Maher is a joo and so is Larry King. Clear proof that joos rule the media. Its scary to thing that so many people think like people in the Nazi Germany. Obama is not Hitler but the comments that Jesse Jackson made about Obama and the "zionists" now that is scary.

Thunder · 14th October 2008, 05:52 PM

What Truthers FAIL to realize..and FAIL to ask..is why should Stone do a movie about 9-11 conspiracies if he doesn't believe in them???

Duhh!!

Mince · 14th October 2008, 09:58 PM

Originally Posted by Drudgewire

Of course, by that standard the movie would be 18 seconds long.

Including previews.

14th October 2008, 12:16 PM	#1
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Queens Posts: 34,947	Oliver Stone...9-11 Cover-up Conspirator??? http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/ seems like the Truthers (or just Marc Dice) is furious at Oliver Stone for nor including any stupid 9-11 conspiracy stuff in his new movie "W". If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems. Or maybe his real name...is Oliver Stein? Hmmmmm....

14th October 2008, 12:23 PM	#2
roundhead Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 824	Originally Posted by parky76 http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/ seems like the Truthers (or just Marc Dice) is furious at Oliver Stone for nor including any stupid 9-11 conspiracy stuff in his new movie "W". If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems. Or maybe his real name...is Oliver Stein? Hmmmmm.... Or perhaps he just was concerned about the movie being allowed in theatres
roundhead Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 824

14th October 2008, 12:29 PM	#3
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	First sentence: Quote: Thousands in the 9/11 Truth Movement are angry with Oliver Stone over his new biopic film of George W. Bush, for not producing a 9/11 conspiracy movie similar to his film JFK in 1991. Would you believe it gets less accurate from there? Best part is, what with no reference link or anything, it appears to be a press release written by Dice. If that's the case, this is most embarrassingly pathetic case of verbal self-fellating I've seen at least this year.
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

14th October 2008, 12:40 PM	#5
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019	Originally Posted by parky76 If even Oliver Stone doesn't believe your conspiracy theory, you KNOW you got problems. Especially since Stone reviles W. so much.
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019

14th October 2008, 12:44 PM	#7
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019	Originally Posted by roundhead Or perhaps he just was concerned about the movie being allowed in theatres Yeah. An Oliver Stone directed movie not being allowed in theaters. Sheeeeeeah. Riiiiigggghhhht. Stone could film himself taking a dump for two hours and it would be "allowed in theaters".
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019	Last edited by Mince; 14th October 2008 at 12:45 PM.

14th October 2008, 12:34 PM	#4
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Queens Posts: 34,947	Is it possible that Marc Dice is like that character in X-Men 3....who can make hundreds or even thousands of copies of himself? Na....I doubt it. Im sure hundreds if not thousands of Truthers will be out protesting "W".

14th October 2008, 12:44 PM	#6
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,804	I have to agree: When Oliver Stone thinks a conspiracy theory is a bunch of crap, it has to have a level of crappiness that is truly remarkable.

14th October 2008, 01:39 PM	#8
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Queens Posts: 34,947	Originally Posted by Mince Yeah. An Oliver Stone directed movie not being allowed in theaters. Sheeeeeeah. Riiiiigggghhhht. Stone could film himself taking a dump for two hours and it would be "allowed in theaters". I have to agree. Done with as much tact and facts and sensitivity as possible, Oliver Stone could very well put a 9-11 conspiracy movie in thousands of theatres across the country. But, I guess, Oliver Stone is a patriot American and doesn't feel like going down this road.

14th October 2008, 01:45 PM	#9
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	Originally Posted by parky76 I have to agree. Done with as much tact and facts and sensitivity as possible, Oliver Stone could very well put a 9-11 conspiracy movie in thousands of theatres across the country. Of course, by that standard the movie would be 18 seconds long.
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

14th October 2008, 03:14 PM	#10
PhantomWolf Philosopher Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base Posts: 9,907	You do remember that Oliver Stone has already done a 9/11 movie?
	__________________ It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My Apollo Page. 1 on 1 Debating Forum for Skeptics and sceptics.

14th October 2008, 03:36 PM	#11
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	Originally Posted by PhantomWolf You do remember that Oliver Stone has already done a 9/11 movie? Oh, the suave pick-up artist made sure we didn't forget. Quote: Many believe that Stone not only missed the boat on this one, but that he is purposefully avoiding the difficult issues surrounding 9/11, and has now become an accomplice in the 9/11 cover-up. In 2006, Stone directed a film titled World Trade Center, which focused on the rescue of two port authority workers following the attacks, making this new film his second whitewash of Bush and 9/11. What a douche.
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

14th October 2008, 03:50 PM	#12
TexasJack Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 10,881	Apparently Stone used the wrong screenwriters. "There has GOT to be scripts about this floating around Hollywood. Stone could have gotten Alex Jones, David Ray Griffen, or the Loose Change guys as script consultants, and had a couple of writers knock out a script in a few months" http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChange...opic/739907/1/

14th October 2008, 03:57 PM	#13
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	Having read Stone's book (he's awesome. LOVE his 80s and 90s work, even the critically-panned stuff like Any Given Sunday), I really hope Oliver responds to this. Cuz he'll ing go OFF on these morons.
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

14th October 2008, 04:27 PM	#14
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	this is a hoot: Quote: producing a 9/11 conspiracy movie similar to his film JFK in 1991. UH NEWS FOR YOU...JFK was a FICTIONAL movie about the conspiracies surrounding the assassination of JFK! This is when you can tell that these idiots do not know fact from fiction; reality from fantasy.
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	__________________ Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato. “Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.” “Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”

14th October 2008, 04:34 PM	#15
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	Originally Posted by Arus808 UH NEWS FOR YOU...JFK was a FICTIONAL movie about the conspiracies surrounding the assassination of JFK! This is when you can tell that these idiots do not know fact from fiction; reality from fantasy. Years back I took a speech class where someone did his persuasive speech on the JFK assassination. I stopped him in his tracks when his visual aid was not the Zapruder film BUT THE ING OLIVER STONE VERSION OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM!!
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

14th October 2008, 05:01 PM	#16
PhantomWolf Philosopher Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base Posts: 9,907	For those that haven't seen it. 100 Errors in JFK movie
	__________________ It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My Apollo Page. 1 on 1 Debating Forum for Skeptics and sceptics.

14th October 2008, 05:08 PM	#17
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,804	I have the same feelings about Oliver Stone and "JFK" I do about Leni Reifensthal and "Triumph Of The Will": a brilliant piece of filmmaking but a total twisting and distorting of the truth. And on a Non CT note I have issues with the way Stone Blew it with "Alexander". IF there was ever good subject matter for great historical epic it is Alexander the Great; but Stone managed to blow it bigtime. Yesh, a couple of the Battle scenes are great (Gaugamela is incredible) but the film overall is a confused mess.

14th October 2008, 05:39 PM	#18
moon1969 Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,288	Oliver Stone is a joo so of course he was involved with Jack Abramoff and mossad. Those sneaky joo. Even if there are 1.3 billion muslims and only 13-14million jews still them joos are sneak. Maher is a joo and so is Larry King. Clear proof that joos rule the media. Its scary to thing that so many people think like people in the Nazi Germany. Obama is not Hitler but the comments that Jesse Jackson made about Obama and the "zionists" now that is scary.

14th October 2008, 05:52 PM	#19
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Queens Posts: 34,947	What Truthers FAIL to realize..and FAIL to ask..is why should Stone do a movie about 9-11 conspiracies if he doesn't believe in them??? Duhh!!

14th October 2008, 09:58 PM	#20
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019	Originally Posted by Drudgewire Of course, by that standard the movie would be 18 seconds long. Including previews.
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019