Szamboti's Hypothesis

9/11 Chewy Defense · 8th July 2010, 09:08 AM

Mr. Szamboti's hypothesis on this PDF website: http://thewarofterror.livelyblog.com...twintowers.pdf

Yeah I know it's from 2007, gimme a break!

Here's an example of his hypothesis:

Quote:

The fact that the twin towers both collapsed due to a cause, which must obey the laws of physics, cannot be disputed. It is that cause which some claim is in dispute at the moment. The alternative collapse causation theories, which have been proposed to counter the insufficient U.S. government theory, are

1. A directed energy weapon was used to destroy the towers.
2. Mini-nukes were used to destroy the towers.
3. The towers were destroyed via controlled demolition with the use of incendiaries and explosives.

In all seriousness WTH does an "energy weapon" have to do with gravity being the cause of collaspe? First off, nothing! A crazy person would have to prove that an energy weapon does exist. Simply talking about it doesn't make it real.

Mini-nukes are another wonder blunder of an insane theory. Questions abound as to: Who made the mini-nukes, who planted them & who witnessed the perpatraitors planting said devices throughout two 110 story buildings without being seen?

A controlled demolition would still require teams of people & manpower to accomplish, let alone silence those who saw the CD charges being planted.

I've only got 1 question: Why would anyone be crazy enough to risk their job on baseless facts that have no evidence, what-so-ever, to back them up?

If you're a structural engineer & know that the plane damage, fires & gravity were the direct result of the WTCs' collapsing, you've risked nothing for the truth. Those that don't believe that plane damage, fires & gravity didn't cause the WTCs' to collapse have risked everything for an insane theory.

carlitos · 8th July 2010, 09:10 AM

delete

9/11 Chewy Defense · 8th July 2010, 09:13 AM

I'd like to hear what Mr. Szamboti has to say on his part!

Seymour Butz · 8th July 2010, 09:23 AM

Originally Posted by 9/11 Chewy Defense

I've only got 1 question: Why would anyone be crazy enough to risk their job on baseless facts that have no evidence, what-so-ever, to back them up?

He sounds like he's looking for a career change from engineer > conspiracy peddler.

Consider the fact that Tony appears to be of middle age and doesn't have a job that takes much ability. To me, this indicates that his engineering ability has taken him as far as it ever will > designing antennas. He realizes that he'll never make it to any type of prestige job nor management. His failure to produce anything of any scientific merit nor weight speaks volumes to this.

He sees folks that I'm sure he sees as absolute dolts - like Gage and Jones - making an easy living off the stupidity of others and is jealous. He's jealous of newbies like Derek Johnson being promoted by Gage as the next wunderkind.

Combine the lack of engineering skilz and what amounts to envy, and to me, it's clear that he's shooting himself in the foot so he can claim martyr to twoofs and become their next hero.

Grizzly Bear · 8th July 2010, 09:25 AM

In defense of Szamboti although I think his controlled demolition arguments are insane he does not support the "directed energy weapon" or "mini-nuke" theories. If you're going to criticize the man at least direct your criticism to the claims that he supports and understand what he wrote; It's not that difficult. We already have a ton of threads dealing with the claims he's repeated ad nauseum, I doubt we need yet another, and I don't see how adding material artificially to the already insane demolition theory is going to bolster or serve anything.

Architect · 8th July 2010, 10:39 AM

He asked me to look at some arguments about detailed safety factors once but, to be honest, I got caught up actually designing buildings and never got around to a response.

beachnut · 8th July 2010, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by 9/11 Chewy Defense

Mr. Szamboti's hypothesis on this ...

Most people keep their fantasy to movies and books; 911 truth and Tony ,the "real CD deal", let fantasy rule their lives as paranoid conspiracy theorists.

911 truth make up lies like this big lie by Tony.

Quote:

The evidence, which has surfaced in support of the controlled
demolition hypothesis, in the last two years, is overwhelming.

Big lies are the only thing 911 truth does, Tony is 911 truth. Where is the overwhelming evidence? Where is the evidence? In their heads!

... the paranoid conspiracy theorist making up more lies, trying to explain why did the US government did 911...

Quote:

soon to be built U.S. oil company controlled gas pipeline in Afghanistan

8 years of failure, a flashback to 6 years of failure.

Another delusional paper, and old delusional paper. No effort was taken in researching the paper, it was made up off the cuff using opinions based on hearsay, lies and fantasy.

9/11 Chewy Defense · 9th July 2010, 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear

In defense of Szamboti although I think his controlled demolition arguments are insane he does not support the "directed energy weapon" or "mini-nuke" theories. If you're going to criticize the man at least direct your criticism to the claims that he supports and understand what he wrote; It's not that difficult. We already have a ton of threads dealing with the claims he's repeated ad nauseum, I doubt we need yet another, and I don't see how adding material artificially to the already insane demolition theory is going to bolster or serve anything.

Just as long as Mr. Szamboti continues to pursue his fantasies that something other than plane damage, fires & gravity were the main cause of the WTCs' collapse. There will be people who will continue to disagree with his theories, no matter how absurd or insane they might be.

9/11 Chewy Defense · 9th July 2010, 08:52 AM

Originally Posted by beachnut

Most people keep their fantasy to movies and books; 911 truth and Tony ,the "real CD deal", let fantasy rule their lives as paranoid conspiracy theorists.

911 truth make up lies like this big lie by Tony.

Big lies are the only thing 911 truth does, Tony is 911 truth. Where is the overwhelming evidence? Where is the evidence? In their heads!

... the paranoid conspiracy theorist making up more lies, trying to explain why did the US government did 911...
8 years of failure, a flashback to 6 years of failure.

Another delusional paper, and old delusional paper. No effort was taken in researching the paper, it was made up off the cuff using opinions based on hearsay, lies and fantasy.

Mr. Szamboti is like Richard Gage, in a way. Both of them get this silly theory & run with it, then they pursuade the gullible into thinking somethings "amist" & they feed this garbage to them. They both have nothing to gain!

9/11 Chewy Defense · 9th July 2010, 08:59 AM

Originally Posted by Seymour Butz

He sounds like he's looking for a career change from engineer > conspiracy peddler.

Consider the fact that Tony appears to be of middle age and doesn't have a job that takes much ability. To me, this indicates that his engineering ability has taken him as far as it ever will > designing antennas. He realizes that he'll never make it to any type of prestige job nor management. His failure to produce anything of any scientific merit nor weight speaks volumes to this.

He sees folks that I'm sure he sees as absolute dolts - like Gage and Jones - making an easy living off the stupidity of others and is jealous. He's jealous of newbies like Derek Johnson being promoted by Gage as the next wunderkind.

Combine the lack of engineering skilz and what amounts to envy, and to me, it's clear that he's shooting himself in the foot so he can claim martyr to twoofs and become their next hero.

If I were Mr. Szamboti, I would've given up this charade long ago. And if I recieved money from gullible people & not given any to the 9/11 Families or charity, I would consider myself a fraud & a liar. Everyone remembers what happened to Al Capone when he didn't pay Uncle Sam the percentage from the booze he sold. It's something the Truthers should know, it's called tax evasion!

8th July 2010, 09:08 AM	#1
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Szamboti's Hypothesis Mr. Szamboti's hypothesis on this PDF website: http://thewarofterror.livelyblog.com...twintowers.pdf Yeah I know it's from 2007, gimme a break! Here's an example of his hypothesis: Quote: The fact that the twin towers both collapsed due to a cause, which must obey the laws of physics, cannot be disputed. It is that cause which some claim is in dispute at the moment. The alternative collapse causation theories, which have been proposed to counter the insufficient U.S. government theory, are 1. A directed energy weapon was used to destroy the towers. 2. Mini-nukes were used to destroy the towers. 3. The towers were destroyed via controlled demolition with the use of incendiaries and explosives. In all seriousness WTH does an "energy weapon" have to do with gravity being the cause of collaspe? First off, nothing! A crazy person would have to prove that an energy weapon does exist. Simply talking about it doesn't make it real. Mini-nukes are another wonder blunder of an insane theory. Questions abound as to: Who made the mini-nukes, who planted them & who witnessed the perpatraitors planting said devices throughout two 110 story buildings without being seen? A controlled demolition would still require teams of people & manpower to accomplish, let alone silence those who saw the CD charges being planted. I've only got 1 question: Why would anyone be crazy enough to risk their job on baseless facts that have no evidence, what-so-ever, to back them up? If you're a structural engineer & know that the plane damage, fires & gravity were the direct result of the WTCs' collapsing, you've risked nothing for the truth. Those that don't believe that plane damage, fires & gravity didn't cause the WTCs' to collapse have risked everything for an insane theory.
	Last edited by 9/11 Chewy Defense; 8th July 2010 at 09:09 AM.

8th July 2010, 09:13 AM	#3
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	I'd like to hear what Mr. Szamboti has to say on his part!
	Last edited by 9/11 Chewy Defense; 8th July 2010 at 09:14 AM.

8th July 2010, 09:23 AM	#4
Seymour Butz Muse Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 650	Originally Posted by 9/11 Chewy Defense I've only got 1 question: Why would anyone be crazy enough to risk their job on baseless facts that have no evidence, what-so-ever, to back them up? He sounds like he's looking for a career change from engineer > conspiracy peddler. Consider the fact that Tony appears to be of middle age and doesn't have a job that takes much ability. To me, this indicates that his engineering ability has taken him as far as it ever will > designing antennas. He realizes that he'll never make it to any type of prestige job nor management. His failure to produce anything of any scientific merit nor weight speaks volumes to this. He sees folks that I'm sure he sees as absolute dolts - like Gage and Jones - making an easy living off the stupidity of others and is jealous. He's jealous of newbies like Derek Johnson being promoted by Gage as the next wunderkind. Combine the lack of engineering skilz and what amounts to envy, and to me, it's clear that he's shooting himself in the foot so he can claim martyr to twoofs and become their next hero.
Seymour Butz Muse Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 650

8th July 2010, 09:25 AM	#5
Grizzly Bear このマスクによっ Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 5,690	In defense of Szamboti although I think his controlled demolition arguments are insane he does not support the "directed energy weapon" or "mini-nuke" theories. If you're going to criticize the man at least direct your criticism to the claims that he supports and understand what he wrote; It's not that difficult. We already have a ton of threads dealing with the claims he's repeated ad nauseum, I doubt we need yet another, and I don't see how adding material artificially to the already insane demolition theory is going to bolster or serve anything.
Grizzly Bear このマスクによっ Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 5,690	__________________ Graduation on 8/13/2011 8D Last edited by Grizzly Bear; 8th July 2010 at 09:26 AM.

8th July 2010, 10:39 AM	#6
Architect Chief Punkah Wallah Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: UK Posts: 8,478	He asked me to look at some arguments about detailed safety factors once but, to be honest, I got caught up actually designing buildings and never got around to a response.
	__________________ When the men elected to make laws are but a small part of a foreign parliament, that is when all healthy national feeling dies. James Keir Hardie (1856 - 1915): Politician, Founder of Scottish Labour Party

8th July 2010, 09:10 AM	#2
carlitos "más divertido" Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 11,554	delete

8th July 2010, 10:55 AM	#7
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,902	Originally Posted by 9/11 Chewy Defense Mr. Szamboti's hypothesis on this ... Most people keep their fantasy to movies and books; 911 truth and Tony ,the "real CD deal", let fantasy rule their lives as paranoid conspiracy theorists. 911 truth make up lies like this big lie by Tony. Quote: The evidence, which has surfaced in support of the controlled demolition hypothesis, in the last two years, is overwhelming. Big lies are the only thing 911 truth does, Tony is 911 truth. Where is the overwhelming evidence? Where is the evidence? In their heads! ... the paranoid conspiracy theorist making up more lies, trying to explain why did the US government did 911... Quote: soon to be built U.S. oil company controlled gas pipeline in Afghanistan 8 years of failure, a flashback to 6 years of failure. Another delusional paper, and old delusional paper. No effort was taken in researching the paper, it was made up off the cuff using opinions based on hearsay, lies and fantasy.

9th July 2010, 08:50 AM	#8
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear In defense of Szamboti although I think his controlled demolition arguments are insane he does not support the "directed energy weapon" or "mini-nuke" theories. If you're going to criticize the man at least direct your criticism to the claims that he supports and understand what he wrote; It's not that difficult. We already have a ton of threads dealing with the claims he's repeated ad nauseum, I doubt we need yet another, and I don't see how adding material artificially to the already insane demolition theory is going to bolster or serve anything. Just as long as Mr. Szamboti continues to pursue his fantasies that something other than plane damage, fires & gravity were the main cause of the WTCs' collapse. There will be people who will continue to disagree with his theories, no matter how absurd or insane they might be.

9th July 2010, 08:52 AM	#9
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Originally Posted by beachnut Most people keep their fantasy to movies and books; 911 truth and Tony ,the "real CD deal", let fantasy rule their lives as paranoid conspiracy theorists. 911 truth make up lies like this big lie by Tony. Big lies are the only thing 911 truth does, Tony is 911 truth. Where is the overwhelming evidence? Where is the evidence? In their heads! ... the paranoid conspiracy theorist making up more lies, trying to explain why did the US government did 911... 8 years of failure, a flashback to 6 years of failure. Another delusional paper, and old delusional paper. No effort was taken in researching the paper, it was made up off the cuff using opinions based on hearsay, lies and fantasy. Mr. Szamboti is like Richard Gage, in a way. Both of them get this silly theory & run with it, then they pursuade the gullible into thinking somethings "amist" & they feed this garbage to them. They both have nothing to gain!

9th July 2010, 08:59 AM	#10
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Originally Posted by Seymour Butz He sounds like he's looking for a career change from engineer > conspiracy peddler. Consider the fact that Tony appears to be of middle age and doesn't have a job that takes much ability. To me, this indicates that his engineering ability has taken him as far as it ever will > designing antennas. He realizes that he'll never make it to any type of prestige job nor management. His failure to produce anything of any scientific merit nor weight speaks volumes to this. He sees folks that I'm sure he sees as absolute dolts - like Gage and Jones - making an easy living off the stupidity of others and is jealous. He's jealous of newbies like Derek Johnson being promoted by Gage as the next wunderkind. Combine the lack of engineering skilz and what amounts to envy, and to me, it's clear that he's shooting himself in the foot so he can claim martyr to twoofs and become their next hero. If I were Mr. Szamboti, I would've given up this charade long ago. And if I recieved money from gullible people & not given any to the 9/11 Families or charity, I would consider myself a fraud & a liar. Everyone remembers what happened to Al Capone when he didn't pay Uncle Sam the percentage from the booze he sold. It's something the Truthers should know, it's called tax evasion!
	Last edited by 9/11 Chewy Defense; 9th July 2010 at 09:01 AM.