Well, this is new - Operation Amalgam Virgo

Arus808 · 18th July 2010, 10:57 AM

This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001.

http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194

... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.

Dog Town · 18th July 2010, 11:04 AM

Originally Posted by Arus808

... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.

And this is the least complex version?

Quote:

Without going off the deep end with possible definitions and connections (Occam's razor) the simplest picture generated directly connects this so-called "hypothetical exercise" to a pre-planned picture; the picture I tried to get across in my January post. What I had said back then, in essence, was that 911 was a "signed" work. In other words, the sky at the time of the first 911 plane hit was identical to the sky at SUNRISE, on the VERNAL EQUINOX, as also viewed from NY, back in 23,615 BC, also known as the great year, as deliberately reverse calculated by the Maya Long Count from 2012. That sky had Virgo EXACTLY on the horizon in both pictures, ancient and modern.

This is an esoteric approach - hello - anyone listening?

Not so much!

Orphia Nay · 19th July 2010, 01:50 AM

So Virgo was on the horizon at a completely different time and date to the first plane hit??????!!!!!!!OMGBBQ!!!!111!!

Hans · 19th July 2010, 04:18 AM

Quote:

the sky at the time of the first 911 plane hit was identical to the sky at SUNRISE, on the VERNAL EQUINOX, as also viewed from NY, back in 23,615 BC

No not really it wouldn't be identical due to the expansion of space(very very tiny)and the gravity interaction of the the stars within the milky way with other stars. It would be slightly different not to mention the Novas that has snuffed out some stars and the birth of new stars.

Comsat Angel · 19th July 2010, 04:37 AM

Originally Posted by Arus808

This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001.

http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194

... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.

Say what?

Could you explain this - don't tell me there are Twoofers who believe 911 happened three months early!

BigAl · 19th July 2010, 04:56 AM

Originally Posted by Arus808

This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001.

http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194

... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.

There was lots of hard information to show the need for counter-terrorism drills prior to 9/11/2001, especially in NYC.

BenBurch · 19th July 2010, 06:08 AM

In June of that year I was on the radio discussing the missile defense and how it does not address a realistic terrorist threat. I was asked what a realistic threat was and I replied "Stealing an airliner and crashing it into a target of high value."

So I guess that means I plotted this whole thing for the NWO, right?

Similarly ANY exercise could be "foreshadowing" or "preparation" if you already think that its a vast governmental conspiracy.

Rolfe · 19th July 2010, 07:16 AM

You know, I read the thread title as "Operation Anagram", and wondered what the hell the investigation into Peter Tobin's serial killing and his possible earlier cereer as Bible John had to do with 9/11....

Rolfe.

onlychild · 20th July 2010, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by Arus808

This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001.

... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.

I would be more than happy to explain it - if you wish. I had to cut out the URL in the quote it seems, but you can find it in the original post.

Orphia Nay · 20th July 2010, 09:38 PM

Originally Posted by onlychild

I would be more than happy to explain it - if you wish. I had to cut out the URL in the quote it seems, but you can find it in the original post.

Welcome to the forum, onlychild.

Is this the link you want posted?

http://dhost.info/onlychild/

I have to go out in a minute, but I'll have a read of your page as soon as I can.

Orphia Nay · 20th July 2010, 10:43 PM

From that link:

Quote:

If we were to look at SUNRISE on the VERNAL EQUINOX in the year 23,615 BC (the very month we landed on above) we would need to ask one single question: WHY is the sky represented at that time THE EXACT SAME SKY as the September 11, 2001 sky at the time of the very first plane crash into the World Trade Center tower? Both views are from the same NY coordinates.

Onlychild, you are committing the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy.

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/texsharp.html

Quote:

The Texas sharpshooter is a fabled marksman who fires his gun randomly at the side of a barn, then paints a bullseye around the spot where the most bullet holes cluster. The story of this Lone Star state shooter has given its name to a fallacy apparently first described in the field of epidemiology, which studies how cases of disease cluster in a population.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy

Quote:

The Texas sharpshooter fallacy is a logical fallacy in which information that has no relationship is interpreted or manipulated until it appears to have meaning. The name comes from a joke about a Texan who fires some shots at the side of a barn, then paints a target centered on the biggest cluster of hits and claims to be a sharpshooter.

Onlychild, you have not turned the clock back exactly 25,627 years (The Long Count). You have turned it back, then turned it again to a spot where you are claiming 'bullseye'.

You did not hit the bullseye. You just painted a target where you wanted a bullseye to be.

marplots · 20th July 2010, 10:48 PM

The Frances Bacon quote at the end of the post says it all for me.

onlychild · 21st July 2010, 07:07 AM

I find it amazing that people continually make the remarks they do, which would presuppose that said people understood where the error was in the data pile they were looking at.

So I will sit back and allow you to teach me where the error in a 36 year personal research project lies.

T.A.M. · 21st July 2010, 09:41 AM

You could spend 36 years researching unicorns or santa claus...that does not make them any more real. Provide concrete physical evidence (not the usual supposition and speculation) and you'll have our attention.

So far, you fail.

TAM

onlychild · 21st July 2010, 10:35 AM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

You could spend 36 years researching unicorns or santa claus...that does not make them any more real. Provide concrete physical evidence (not the usual supposition and speculation) and you'll have our attention.

So far, you fail.

TAM

So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention.

9/11 Chewy Defense · 21st July 2010, 10:46 AM

Originally Posted by onlychild

So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention.

Using astrology as "evidence" of anything doesn't prove jack. So you're proved wrong, reguardless of what you might think or say about 9/11. You simply have no evidence to back up any claims or theories that you might have.

As for my astrology sign, I'm a Virgo, I was born Sept. 12th. So you think I helped "plan" 9/11?

T.A.M. · 21st July 2010, 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by onlychild

So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention.

You are the one making the claim. The burden of proof is upon you. You will get no discussion worth having until you realize this and bring your evidence.

TAM

onlychild · 21st July 2010, 02:05 PM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

You are the one making the claim. The burden of proof is upon you. You will get no discussion worth having until you realize this and bring your evidence.

TAM

You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices.

I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument.

You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here.

9/11 Chewy Defense · 21st July 2010, 02:12 PM

Originally Posted by onlychild

You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices.

I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument.

You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here.

You can't make people follow your "line". They have their own lines to follow & there's nothing you can do to stop them doing it.

Get some evidence & you'll earn respect!

Dog Town · 21st July 2010, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by onlychild

I said I would explain it if anyone was interested.

People took enough interest to call you out on it! Were you only going to "explain", if everyone here gave you a "Hoo-Rah", instead of a "boo-hoo"?
If so, you badly misjudged your audience. Perhaps you should have observed a bit longer? Nah...doubt you would still get it!

Quote:

You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here.

For the record:
Respect is earned, and if you want it here, you better bring the heat, cuz all of us can hit, sliders, and change-ups! But don't be surprised, if we send your fast ball out of the park, as well!
Oh' and no one older than US, talks like that! See ya, wouldn't want to...

dudalb · 21st July 2010, 04:10 PM

Originally Posted by BenBurch

In June of that year I was on the radio discussing the missile defense and how it does not address a realistic terrorist threat. I was asked what a realistic threat was and I replied "Stealing an airliner and crashing it into a target of high value."

So I guess that means I plotted this whole thing for the NWO, right?

Similarly ANY exercise could be "foreshadowing" or "preparation" if you already think that its a vast governmental conspiracy.

And Tom Clancy in a 1994 novel beat you to the punch.......

Orphia Nay · 21st July 2010, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by onlychild

I find it amazing that people continually make the remarks they do, which would presuppose that said people understood where the error was in the data pile they were looking at.

So I will sit back and allow you to teach me where the error in a 36 year personal research project lies.

You've known about 9/11 for 36 years? You were in on it!

I'm reporting you to the FBI.

T.A.M. · 22nd July 2010, 12:20 PM

Originally Posted by onlychild

You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices.

I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument.

You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here.

okie dokie, don't let the door hit you on the way out. Not sure what you expected of your visit here, but I hope it was entertaining.

You are still wrong until you prove differently through the presentation of evidence.

As for your age, on the internet you are the same as everyone else, and must earn respect. You are a newbie who came here responding to justified skepticism over your evidenceless, supposition of a theory that has not a flicker of proof to back it up...what did you expect?

TAM

KingMerv00 · 22nd July 2010, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Operation Amalgam Virgo

Operation magnetic poetry.

18th July 2010, 10:57 AM	#1
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	Well, this is new - Operation Amalgam Virgo This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001. http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194 ... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims.
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	__________________ Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato. “Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.” “Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”

18th July 2010, 11:04 AM	#2
Dog Town Space for Rent Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Sunny blue sky, cold water. Posts: 4,461	Originally Posted by Arus808 ... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims. And this is the least complex version? Quote: Without going off the deep end with possible definitions and connections (Occam's razor) the simplest picture generated directly connects this so-called "hypothetical exercise" to a pre-planned picture; the picture I tried to get across in my January post. What I had said back then, in essence, was that 911 was a "signed" work. In other words, the sky at the time of the first 911 plane hit was identical to the sky at SUNRISE, on the VERNAL EQUINOX, as also viewed from NY, back in 23,615 BC, also known as the great year, as deliberately reverse calculated by the Maya Long Count from 2012. That sky had Virgo EXACTLY on the horizon in both pictures, ancient and modern. This is an esoteric approach - hello - anyone listening? Not so much!
	__________________ "Yes. I often wonder why it is that the nutjobs, who clearly think they're among a tiny handful of people who "get it", are wholly incapable of communicating effectively enough so that other people can understand them and "get it", too." Gee Mack, JREF 5/15/09

19th July 2010, 01:50 AM	#3
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 28,345	So Virgo was on the horizon at a completely different time and date to the first plane hit??????!!!!!!!OMGBBQ!!!!111!!
	__________________ Are you an ex-Truther? Please share your story. ~ The Australasian Skeptics Forum.

19th July 2010, 04:37 AM	#5
Comsat Angel Muse Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 893	Originally Posted by Arus808 This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001. http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194 ... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims. Say what? Could you explain this - don't tell me there are Twoofers who believe 911 happened three months early!
Comsat Angel Muse Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 893

19th July 2010, 04:56 AM	#6
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	Originally Posted by Arus808 This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001. http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?t=8194 ... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims. There was lots of hard information to show the need for counter-terrorism drills prior to 9/11/2001, especially in NYC.
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	__________________ ------ Eric Pode of Croydon Chief Assistant to the Assistance Chief, Dept of Redundancy Dept.

19th July 2010, 04:18 AM	#4
Hans Master Poster Join Date: May 2007 Location: NW United States Posts: 2,782	Quote: the sky at the time of the first 911 plane hit was identical to the sky at SUNRISE, on the VERNAL EQUINOX, as also viewed from NY, back in 23,615 BC No not really it wouldn't be identical due to the expansion of space(very very tiny)and the gravity interaction of the the stars within the milky way with other stars. It would be slightly different not to mention the Novas that has snuffed out some stars and the birth of new stars.

19th July 2010, 06:08 AM	#7
BenBurch Gatekeeper of The Left Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one. Posts: 32,090	In June of that year I was on the radio discussing the missile defense and how it does not address a realistic terrorist threat. I was asked what a realistic threat was and I replied "Stealing an airliner and crashing it into a target of high value." So I guess that means I plotted this whole thing for the NWO, right? Similarly ANY exercise could be "foreshadowing" or "preparation" if you already think that its a vast governmental conspiracy.
	__________________ Are you IN? Join the IN crowd now!

19th July 2010, 07:16 AM	#8
Rolfe Anti-homeopathy illuminati member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NT 150 511 Posts: 34,314	You know, I read the thread title as "Operation Anagram", and wondered what the hell the investigation into Peter Tobin's serial killing and his possible earlier cereer as Bible John had to do with 9/11.... Rolfe.
	__________________ "The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

20th July 2010, 03:28 PM	#9
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4	Originally Posted by Arus808 This operation was a response to 9/11 happening in June of 2001. ... I'm just....perplexed at this person's claims. I would be more than happy to explain it - if you wish. I had to cut out the URL in the quote it seems, but you can find it in the original post.
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4

20th July 2010, 09:38 PM	#10
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 28,345	Originally Posted by onlychild I would be more than happy to explain it - if you wish. I had to cut out the URL in the quote it seems, but you can find it in the original post. Welcome to the forum, onlychild. Is this the link you want posted? http://dhost.info/onlychild/ I have to go out in a minute, but I'll have a read of your page as soon as I can.
	__________________ Are you an ex-Truther? Please share your story. ~ The Australasian Skeptics Forum.

20th July 2010, 10:43 PM	#11
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 28,345	From that link: Quote: If we were to look at SUNRISE on the VERNAL EQUINOX in the year 23,615 BC (the very month we landed on above) we would need to ask one single question: WHY is the sky represented at that time THE EXACT SAME SKY as the September 11, 2001 sky at the time of the very first plane crash into the World Trade Center tower? Both views are from the same NY coordinates. Onlychild, you are committing the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy. http://www.fallacyfiles.org/texsharp.html Quote: The Texas sharpshooter is a fabled marksman who fires his gun randomly at the side of a barn, then paints a bullseye around the spot where the most bullet holes cluster. The story of this Lone Star state shooter has given its name to a fallacy apparently first described in the field of epidemiology, which studies how cases of disease cluster in a population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy Quote: The Texas sharpshooter fallacy is a logical fallacy in which information that has no relationship is interpreted or manipulated until it appears to have meaning. The name comes from a joke about a Texan who fires some shots at the side of a barn, then paints a target centered on the biggest cluster of hits and claims to be a sharpshooter. Onlychild, you have not turned the clock back exactly 25,627 years (The Long Count). You have turned it back, then turned it again to a spot where you are claiming 'bullseye'. You did not hit the bullseye. You just painted a target where you wanted a bullseye to be.
	__________________ Are you an ex-Truther? Please share your story. ~ The Australasian Skeptics Forum.

20th July 2010, 10:48 PM	#12
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,367	The Frances Bacon quote at the end of the post says it all for me.
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,367

21st July 2010, 07:07 AM	#13
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4	I find it amazing that people continually make the remarks they do, which would presuppose that said people understood where the error was in the data pile they were looking at. So I will sit back and allow you to teach me where the error in a 36 year personal research project lies.
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4

21st July 2010, 09:41 AM	#14
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	You could spend 36 years researching unicorns or santa claus...that does not make them any more real. Provide concrete physical evidence (not the usual supposition and speculation) and you'll have our attention. So far, you fail. TAM

21st July 2010, 10:35 AM	#15
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4	Originally Posted by T.A.M. You could spend 36 years researching unicorns or santa claus...that does not make them any more real. Provide concrete physical evidence (not the usual supposition and speculation) and you'll have our attention. So far, you fail. TAM So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention.
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4

21st July 2010, 10:46 AM	#16
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Originally Posted by onlychild So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention. Using astrology as "evidence" of anything doesn't prove jack. So you're proved wrong, reguardless of what you might think or say about 9/11. You simply have no evidence to back up any claims or theories that you might have. As for my astrology sign, I'm a Virgo, I was born Sept. 12th. So you think I helped "plan" 9/11?

21st July 2010, 10:54 AM	#17
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Originally Posted by onlychild So far, I have done nothing but drop in this forum. My comments were to those who had said whatever written above. It seems people who BOO-HOO something right off the bat imply that they know where the errors are. I say they don't have a clue, but yet, they have things to say. Prove me wrong - and you will have MY attention. You are the one making the claim. The burden of proof is upon you. You will get no discussion worth having until you realize this and bring your evidence. TAM

21st July 2010, 02:05 PM	#18
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4	Originally Posted by T.A.M. You are the one making the claim. The burden of proof is upon you. You will get no discussion worth having until you realize this and bring your evidence. TAM You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices. I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument. You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here.
onlychild New Blood Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4

21st July 2010, 02:12 PM	#19
9/11 Chewy Defense Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Johnstown, PA Posts: 3,593	Originally Posted by onlychild You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices. I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument. You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here. You can't make people follow your "line". They have their own lines to follow & there's nothing you can do to stop them doing it. Get some evidence & you'll earn respect!

21st July 2010, 03:07 PM	#20
Dog Town Space for Rent Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Sunny blue sky, cold water. Posts: 4,461	Originally Posted by onlychild I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. People took enough interest to call you out on it! Were you only going to "explain", if everyone here gave you a "Hoo-Rah", instead of a "boo-hoo"? If so, you badly misjudged your audience. Perhaps you should have observed a bit longer? Nah...doubt you would still get it! Quote: You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here. For the record: Respect is earned, and if you want it here, you better bring the heat, cuz all of us can hit, sliders, and change-ups! But don't be surprised, if we send your fast ball out of the park, as well! Oh' and no one older than US, talks like that! See ya, wouldn't want to...
	__________________ "Yes. I often wonder why it is that the nutjobs, who clearly think they're among a tiny handful of people who "get it", are wholly incapable of communicating effectively enough so that other people can understand them and "get it", too." Gee Mack, JREF 5/15/09

21st July 2010, 04:10 PM	#21
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,782	Originally Posted by BenBurch In June of that year I was on the radio discussing the missile defense and how it does not address a realistic terrorist threat. I was asked what a realistic threat was and I replied "Stealing an airliner and crashing it into a target of high value." So I guess that means I plotted this whole thing for the NWO, right? Similarly ANY exercise could be "foreshadowing" or "preparation" if you already think that its a vast governmental conspiracy. And Tom Clancy in a 1994 novel beat you to the punch.......

21st July 2010, 08:14 PM	#22
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 28,345	Originally Posted by onlychild I find it amazing that people continually make the remarks they do, which would presuppose that said people understood where the error was in the data pile they were looking at. So I will sit back and allow you to teach me where the error in a 36 year personal research project lies. You've known about 9/11 for 36 years? You were in on it! I'm reporting you to the FBI.
	__________________ Are you an ex-Truther? Please share your story. ~ The Australasian Skeptics Forum.

22nd July 2010, 12:20 PM	#23
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Originally Posted by onlychild You have a problem with control, that doesn't work with me. Let me explain this: I observe people. If I ask a question or make a statement, I observe the responses. Sort of like a field sobriety test where the cop wants the person to walk a straight line, I create a line with words. Then I watch to see if said person is able to follow that line, or, if they weave off that line. Sometimes, they try to create their own line, and actually believe no one notices. I came here because of boo-hoo responses to things I had written somewhere else that I noticed on a Google search. I said I would explain it if anyone was interested. What I got was more boo-hooing as if they knew where I was wrong; you can't boo-hoo data if you have no counter-argument. You should be nice to newbies ... some of us are older than you are and would like some respect. I'm out of here. okie dokie, don't let the door hit you on the way out. Not sure what you expected of your visit here, but I hope it was entertaining. You are still wrong until you prove differently through the presentation of evidence. As for your age, on the internet you are the same as everyone else, and must earn respect. You are a newbie who came here responding to justified skepticism over your evidenceless, supposition of a theory that has not a flicker of proof to back it up...what did you expect? TAM

22nd July 2010, 03:03 PM	#24
KingMerv00 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Philadelphia, PA...USA Posts: 14,482	Quote: Operation Amalgam Virgo Operation magnetic poetry.
	__________________ If man came from dust, why is there still dust?