FREE TAPATALK APP

MRC_Hans · 27th September 2011, 06:32 AM

Deleted. Coming in too late.

Hans

BStrong · 27th September 2011, 06:37 AM

Originally Posted by Dash80

Our NWO contracts require us to spread various types of disinfo. To balance out the number of different truther theories out there.

SShhhh...They're already on to us.

jaydeehess · 27th September 2011, 03:11 PM

Originally Posted by bill smith

But not so many problems that she couldn't make her way with her baby to the initial 16 foot hole that the plane apparently made. And then pass her baby down and drop the ten feet to the lawn outside. Relatively speaking no problem I would say.

post 328

I have , I believe, also asked you a question bill.

You balked at the suggestion of 'high explosives' and also pooh-pooh the idea that it was a 757, yet have not offered up an explanation that satisfies the conditions that Gallop and her compatriots suffered. Note that I will expect that your suggestion can also account for 100 feet of missing ground floor exterior wall.

You also seem fixated on the fact that Gallop did not die (or suffer absolutly greivious injury) when if it had been an explosive detonated several dozen feet from her location she would have even less chance of survival than the ramming of a 757 into the structure several dozen feet from her location. In this fixation you seem to be ignoring the fact that there were others not far from her location who did die..
By your 'logic' the fact that some people survive earthquake collapsed structures would have to be suspicious since being in a building that collapses due to an earthquake kills people.

zeusbheld · 29th September 2011, 12:53 AM

Originally Posted by little grey rabbit

Hundreds of people have claimed to have had sex with the Devil, doesn't make it true.

so eyewitness reports are utterly worthless in your book, yet your spurious, evidence-free claim that Lt. Col. O'Brien fired a missile somehow is worthy of contemplation?

something you may not have considered before pulling that hypothesis of yours out of your colon: how often do military aviators fly a variety of aircraft? in other words, could a pilot who regularly flies a C-130 be assigned to fly something with missiles? and if so, why would he, as opposed to oh, i don't know, a pilot who regularly flies aircraft that fire missiles?

hey, just asking questions.

cjnewson88 · 29th January 2012, 01:27 AM

I don't think I've ever faced palmed quite so much as I did reading the first four pages of this forum post. My god ergo.. just.. my god.

27th September 2011, 06:32 AM	#361
MRC_Hans Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Whithin earshot of the North Sea Posts: 16,604	Deleted. Coming in too late. Hans
	__________________ Don't. Just don't.

29th January 2012, 01:27 AM	#365
cjnewson88 Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: The van with the big antenna Posts: 1,309	I don't think I've ever faced palmed quite so much as I did reading the first four pages of this forum post. My god ergo.. just.. my god.
	__________________ Common sense has clearly been snuck up on from behind beaten several times on the head and left to bleed. Over 140 pieces of evidence showing American 77 hit the Pentagon http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/ http://www.youtube.com/user/cjnewson88

27th September 2011, 06:37 AM	#362
BStrong Illuminator Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: California Posts: 4,047	Originally Posted by Dash80 Our NWO contracts require us to spread various types of disinfo. To balance out the number of different truther theories out there. SShhhh...They're already on to us.

27th September 2011, 03:11 PM	#363
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,966	Originally Posted by bill smith But not so many problems that she couldn't make her way with her baby to the initial 16 foot hole that the plane apparently made. And then pass her baby down and drop the ten feet to the lawn outside. Relatively speaking no problem I would say. post 328 I have , I believe, also asked you a question bill. You balked at the suggestion of 'high explosives' and also pooh-pooh the idea that it was a 757, yet have not offered up an explanation that satisfies the conditions that Gallop and her compatriots suffered. Note that I will expect that your suggestion can also account for 100 feet of missing ground floor exterior wall. You also seem fixated on the fact that Gallop did not die (or suffer absolutly greivious injury) when if it had been an explosive detonated several dozen feet from her location she would have even less chance of survival than the ramming of a 757 into the structure several dozen feet from her location. In this fixation you seem to be ignoring the fact that there were others not far from her location who did die.. By your 'logic' the fact that some people survive earthquake collapsed structures would have to be suspicious since being in a building that collapses due to an earthquake kills people.

29th September 2011, 12:53 AM	#364
zeusbheld Critical Thinker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: onna yott on the Muddy Geranium Posts: 303	Originally Posted by little grey rabbit Hundreds of people have claimed to have had sex with the Devil, doesn't make it true. so eyewitness reports are utterly worthless in your book, yet your spurious, evidence-free claim that Lt. Col. O'Brien fired a missile somehow is worthy of contemplation? something you may not have considered before pulling that hypothesis of yours out of your colon: how often do military aviators fly a variety of aircraft? in other words, could a pilot who regularly flies a C-130 be assigned to fly something with missiles? and if so, why would he, as opposed to oh, i don't know, a pilot who regularly flies aircraft that fire missiles? hey, just asking questions.