| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
Windows 8 Consumer Preview Questions...
I just downloaded and installed Windows 8 Consumer Preview. I have been getting familiar with the new Metro interface and getting more acquainted with some of the new features. My initial reaction is that I'm very surprised and excited about how well this works on a desktop computer.
I have yet to try it out on a tablet or laptop but I'm looking forward to the full release (apparently slated for fall of this year). Some questions I have and not sure if all can be answered here... Why is it that some third party programs have security issues? An example would be having problems logging in to iTunes, accessing web pages on G-Chrome, and content pop-ups on Internet Explorer. Is there something I'm missing? Also, there are many warnings telling me that I should Activate Windows yet when I perform activation it throws back an error. There is no option to call support with an activation code so I'm just curious as to why they would make a big deal about activation if there is no option to do so? Some of the Metro apps won't connect including the Microsoft Store. Should I be registering a Microsoft account in order to use this app or is the connection to the store presently disabled? Anyone here tinkering around with Windows 8? Am interested in any reactions you may have. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
Questions about Windows 8 Consumer Preview...
I just downloaded and installed Windows 8 Consumer Preview. I have been getting familiar with the new Metro interface and getting more acquainted with some of the new features. My initial reaction is that I'm very surprised and excited about how well this works on a desktop computer.
I have yet to try it out on a tablet or laptop but I'm looking forward to the full release (apparently slated for fall of this year). Some questions I have and not sure if all can be answered here... Why is it that some third party programs have security issues? An example would be having problems logging in to iTunes, accessing web pages on G-Chrome, and content pop-ups on Internet Explorer. Is there something I'm missing? Also, there are many warnings telling me that I should Activate Windows yet when I perform activation it throws back an error. There is no option to call support with an activation code so I'm just curious as to why they would make a big deal about activation if there is no option to do so? Some of the Metro apps won't connect including the Microsoft Store. Should I be registering a Microsoft account in order to use this app or is the connection to the store presently disabled? Anyone here tinkering around with Windows 8? Am interested in any reactions you may have. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
Sorry I can't answer your questions. I am sure the issues with the major 3rd party apps. will be resolved when Win 8 is released. Though, it does tell you something about how much of a headache this new level of security is going to be for developers.
I haven't had any Activation issues. But, so far, I can't say I'm a fan of Windows 8. At least not for desktops. The interface is non-intuitive for use with keyboards and mice, and the Metro interface does not integrate well with the Desktop interface. (And, it looks ugly, too. But, that's just a superficial point.) Visual Studio 11 has some good stuff going for it, at least. That's the beta I've been playing with the most. |
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,920
|
|
|
__________________
Trakar AKA/formerly TShaitanaku "Dubitanda quippe ad inquisitionem venimus; inquirendo veritatem percipimus." (By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth.) — Peter Abelard |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
|
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
After further exploration of the new interface, the Start Metro and the Desktop now being considered an "app" of sorts, my 2 cents is that Windows 8 will not only change our familiarity of GUI's past but this is by far the best version of Windows ever!
I'm sure there are those who won't agree but I've given some time to tinker around with the Consumer Preview and it has not disappointed me at all. Sure, there are a few bugs to work out - specifically with some of the apps downloadable from the MS Store - but all in all Microsoft has hit a home run with their new OS. I have been an Apple user for years and own both PC and Mac computers. I was driven to my passion for computers, gaming, and technology through Apple computers. Microsoft came along and created an OS very similar to what was so familiar on the Mac however there was always this "feel" for the intuitive on the Mac that was just never there with the Windows OS. Call me a Mac cultist but I could always see what they meant by 'it just works'. Should I say that once Windows 8 is released, Apple is going to have a big challenge on their hands? First off, Windows 8 will be device compatible as well as sync capable. In other words, if I install Windows on a tablet, I will be able to sync everything to another device such as a desktop, laptop, or other portable Windows device including a phone. You cannot do that with an iPad. Secondly, I think they're taunting the Android market considering you will be able to install Windows 8 on ARM devices. This means if you feel Android just isn't cutting it, you can replace it with Windows. Google, unlike Apple, has a device compatible operating system however there's nothing specifically for laptop or desktop computers. There are many other features that I can explain here however there will also be more to discover in the months ahead up to the actual release of Win8. Apple will definitely have to step it up, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
post-pre-born
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 16,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The White Zone
Posts: 42,264
|
|
|
__________________
If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
I have a Mac.
Two. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,920
|
No doubt, but 7 is fully functional and a pleasure to use and 8 is especially accomodating to mobile, but more limited, platforms. I see nothing wrong with them doing a bit of specialization with 8 and varients being specialized to mobile applications and 7 running more to the desktop and laptop systems. I don't much like shifting software every two years as it is, going in a couple of directions on a staggered basis with new software coming out every 4-6 years should be a much better arrangement, at least until the mobile devices themselves become capable of handling more true laptop/desktop functionality.
|
|
__________________
Trakar AKA/formerly TShaitanaku "Dubitanda quippe ad inquisitionem venimus; inquirendo veritatem percipimus." (By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth.) — Peter Abelard |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,920
|
|
|
__________________
Trakar AKA/formerly TShaitanaku "Dubitanda quippe ad inquisitionem venimus; inquirendo veritatem percipimus." (By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth.) — Peter Abelard |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In the land of the Shatner stealing Mexico touchers
Posts: 5,313
|
Windows 8 is meant for desktop also. It's has optimization for tablets and other mobile devices. There are also alot of people complaining that Win8 is awkward on a desktop.
I've been using it since the developer preview and I personaly don't see thier issue but thats' just me. People tend to be skeptical of change. Win8 is Microsoft's way of dealing with the "Post PC" era. Mobile computing is taking over the industry and companies have to adpat or perish. |
|
__________________
Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,920
|
Largely agreed on all counts. I've played around on the trial versions of 8 just because I am anticipating the flood of Win8 phones and tablets this summer, and it seems more than functional. Depending upon how long MS goes before the next release, I may skip 8 for server and desktops mainly because 7 seems to be such a robust and stable system, at least for everything we require of it.
|
|
__________________
Trakar AKA/formerly TShaitanaku "Dubitanda quippe ad inquisitionem venimus; inquirendo veritatem percipimus." (By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth.) — Peter Abelard |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
Some of my complaints, such as the lack of a Start button is something I might "get used to". Moving to a corner without an icon telling me to move there is going to be weird, but doable.
The whole reason the Taskbar and Start Button were invented was to make it easier for people to see what was open and where to get stuff. In Windows 3.1 this was a problem: Minimized windows weren't easy to see or find, etc. Finding programs and utilities was as small chore. Taking a lot of that out seems like a step backwards to me. But, whatever. Using a scrollwheel to scroll horizontally will bug me more-so, because it's so unnecessary. There is no good reason why Metro has to scroll horizontally on a desktop machine. I had a bigger list of gripes I was forming, some of them more important, I think, but I left it at home. The new instant previewing feature in the IDE The integrated Code Analysis window Multi-browser support for ASP.NET in the IDE The Async features in VB and C# The obligatory improved support for HTML 5 Just to name a few. Also, if you care about C++, you will be happy to know that the development features in VC++ have been upgraded to be on par with those of C# and VB, and that it has better support for C++11 standards. Etc. But, one little thing bugs me: The tool panels ("Solution Explorer", "Toolbox", etc.) all have titles in capital letters, for some reason. It feels like the application is constantly SHOUTING at me! Granted, it's a minor GUI issue. But, it seems kinda stupid that someone, somewhere, thought it would be a good idea to push this less-readable stuff onto us developers. Don't you think?! I will harp on this a little, because I think this might become another standard problem to deal with in a lot of Windows 8 applications. Not just their development tools. The attached images demonstrate this: This first one is from Windows 7 running Visual Studio 2010 Premium Edition. Note that its tool panels are Title Cased, and the icons are colorful, although the contrast in the title bar could use some improvement. And, not everyone liked the purple (though I didn't mind it). (NOTE: You need to be logged in to see these images.) This second one is from Windows 8 Consumer Preview running the current Visual Studio 11 Beta Premium Edition. Note how its panels are ALL IN CAPS, with rather annoying dotted handles. Makes it much more difficult to read. Plus, the icons are drabbier, and missing from the panel tabs. The only visual improvement is the higher contrast in the title bar. And, for some people, the lack of purple might help. |
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In the land of the Shatner stealing Mexico touchers
Posts: 5,313
|
I think the idea was to remove much of the on screen clutter to simplify the view.
This means you have to click or swipe to get the info you once had on constant display. To view open programs you swipe or click on the left edge of the screen. The "start" button is available by swiping or clicking on the right edge of the screen ("charms"). And the Metro tile "Start" screen is essentially all the programs you have installed on your computer presented to you immediately after logon. And clicking the search charm (the magnifying glass icon) makes finding anything on your hard drive quick and easy. (I swear I am not a paid MS shill) It's just the learning curve you have to get past.
Quote:
|
|
__________________
Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 7,228
|
Just what the world needs. An interface that is limited (look ma, no windows) due to the limited screen size of a phone, implemented on large screen. Metro is beyond lame.
|
|
__________________
To survive election season on a skeptics forum, one must understand Hymie-the-Robot (and/or Fat Jack) |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
I understand that. But, for many users it's going to be like Windows 3.1 all over again.
That "clutter" had to be added so people could see it. But, after getting past it, the computer is now left in state that is still less easy to use, in general. This isn't like the Office Ribbon. Yes, there was a learning curve there, but the advantage was that there was MORE visible on the screen, not less. It became easier to use Office (for most people) afterwards. And, more features could be put to better use. Here, with Windows 8, there is less on the screen at any one given time. A typical user is going to use fewer of Windows' features, and they're going to be used a lot less effectively. I don't mind "different". But, "different" shouldn't have to mean "worse off" in something like this. I found it, but it just makes everything tiny and harder to read. It doesn't take a genious to design a better interface: At the very least it could scroll vertically on the Desktop version. |
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
|
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
The Infinitely Prolonged
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester County, NY (when not in space)
Posts: 13,505
|
Actually, there is one aspect of Metro-Style apps. I would like to defend: Statelessness. The idea is that you shouldn't have to worry if a Metro app is actually running or not.
If it hasn't been used in a while, it might be shut down, but the state will be saved, so when it starts up again, it will be as if it wasn't shut down. There is typically, no "exit" or "close" function in a Metro app. That is something I can find value in. The days where an application's settings would only save upon "proper closing" are long gone. But, it didn't have to be slapped into the OS sooo disjointedly! |
|
__________________
WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. SkeptiCamp NYC: http://www.skepticampnyc.org/ An open conference on science and skepticism, where you could be a presenter! By the way, my first name is NOT Bowerick!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,033
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|