Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it' - Page 37

brazenlilraisin · 4th July 2012, 10:20 PM

Because silence is awkward....?

Bell · 5th July 2012, 08:15 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place?

What story?

DGM · 5th July 2012, 09:09 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place?

Why do you think he was "lucky"?

I showed RedIbus he lost money. Do you need to be shown the facts of the day also?

NoahFence · 5th July 2012, 09:38 AM

Only a sick, sick individual would term Larry Silverstein lucky on 9-11.

Dude lost friends, and countless money.

000063 · 5th July 2012, 10:45 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place?

Better question; how could any answer to that question be relevant?

I like how you use the name "Lucky Larry" for a guy who actually lost a shedload of money.

plague311 · 5th July 2012, 11:02 AM

Originally Posted by 000063

Better question; how could any answer to that question be relevant?

I like how you use the name "Lucky Larry" for a guy who actually lost a shedload of money.

The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor.

He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died.

Takes a special person.

The Platypus · 5th July 2012, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by DGM

Why do you think he was "lucky"?

Because that's what he's been told to think by his conspiracy cult's crap.

twinstead · 5th July 2012, 02:17 PM

Originally Posted by The Platypus

Because that's what he's been told to think by his conspiracy cult's crap.

Yea. And they call US sheep

Bell · 5th July 2012, 02:19 PM

Originally Posted by twinstead

Yea. And they call US sheep

That's because sheep make you sleep. You need to wake up!

cjnewson88 · 5th July 2012, 06:00 PM

It saddens me this thread is still active

1337m4n · 6th July 2012, 07:01 PM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place?

You tell me.

ozeco41 · 7th July 2012, 01:00 AM

Originally Posted by cjnewson88

It saddens me this thread is still active

The base problem is that we of the debunker camp are split into two main camps plus a few minorities.

Camp 1 - probably the larger demographic - comprises those who enjoy pointing out the stupidity of truther OR troll claims;

Camp 2 - those like me who support the philosophy of "Ignore the Clowns"

For Camp 1 the sillier the topic the less effort it takes to pour ridicule on the clowns.

And us Camp 2 folk know we are outnumbered and caught in an ironic trap of our own making. Simply put if we post 'Stop feeding the trolls' in a thread we are feeding the trolls....

.....cornered. And no easy way out.

....and, as several members have said, this "pull it" thread must be the most idiotic bit of nonsense....

grandmastershek · 10th July 2012, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by plague311

The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor.

He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died.

Takes a special person.

Indeed...you are very special for drawing such conclusions. If Larry died it would be suspicious for whoever the next surviving person in succession was. However, we do know that plenty of high power executives died that day.

But yeah...you're right. As we all know insurance companies readily pay out on fraud and murder. It's just good business.

twinstead · 10th July 2012, 11:34 AM

Originally Posted by grandmastershek

But yeah...you're right. As we all know insurance companies readily pay out on fraud and murder. It's just good business.

LOL

RedIbis · 11th July 2012, 06:42 PM

Originally Posted by plague311

The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor.

He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died.

Takes a special person.

How do you figure he lost money?

NoahFence · 11th July 2012, 07:37 PM

Originally Posted by RedIbis

How do you figure he lost money?

Paying leases on buildings that no longer exist. You know this. Don't be stupid.

Cl1mh4224rd · 11th July 2012, 10:08 PM

Originally Posted by RedIbis

How do you figure he lost money?

You might want to reread the thread. We've been over this. Perhaps, afterwards, you might consider scheduling an appointment with your physician and tell him or her about your memory troubles.

twinstead · 12th July 2012, 03:40 AM

Originally Posted by RedIbis

How do you figure he lost money?

Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed.

Clayton Moore · 12th July 2012, 03:50 AM

Originally Posted by twinstead

Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed.

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

tsig · 12th July 2012, 04:00 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

What you think has no bearing on reality.

Have you ever made an insurance claim? I have and they didn't just write me a check but wanted estimates for the repairs and receipts for all money spent.

twinstead · 12th July 2012, 04:30 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

I would have expected you to counter with evidence that Larry made money, instead of asking a stupid question, making an irrelevant and purposefully loaded statement, and prefacing another statement with the immortal "I don't think" but that's just me.

Unless you think insurance companies regularly pay out claims when there's even a hint of fraud, or Larry did any better than break even, or you have ANY compelling evidence whatsoever that the man was somehow in on a plot to kill thousands of people so he could "make out like a bandit", then nobody really cares about what you think.

NoahFence · 12th July 2012, 07:11 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

16.5 · 12th July 2012, 07:27 AM

Originally Posted by RedIbis

How do you figure he lost money?

How did you figure he made out like a bandit and received a windfall?

Remember like you've claimed and ignored.

/It takes some balls for a guy like RI to ask a question about Larry's finances and expect an answer. See my sig.

twinstead · 12th July 2012, 07:36 AM

No one has provided a bit of evidence that Larry made any money that day. Red, you shouldn't act as if any of us has forgotten that fact.

DGM · 12th July 2012, 09:31 AM

Originally Posted by NoahFence

Paying leases on buildings that no longer exist. You know this. Don't be stupid.

Originally Posted by Cl1mh4224rd

You might want to reread the thread. We've been over this. Perhaps, afterwards, you might consider scheduling an appointment with your physician and tell him or her about your memory troubles.

Originally Posted by twinstead

Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed.

This may be a hard pill to swallow but, RedIbis is right.

It is very un-likely that he actually lost money. He would have made money by now if 9/11 never happened.

He absolutely did not profit from this.

DGM · 12th July 2012, 09:34 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority.

Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion".

I bet you won't.

000063 · 12th July 2012, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by NoahFence

Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

But, but, he's a rich Jew! The Jews run the system, remember?

twinstead · 12th July 2012, 12:33 PM

Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system.

DGM · 12th July 2012, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by twinstead

Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system.

The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP).

They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006.

Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap.

DGM · 12th July 2012, 01:44 PM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

Originally Posted by DGM

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority.

Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion".

I bet you won't.

Wow!

I'm totally shocked that Clayton Moore can not back up his claim.

As we all knew, He pulled this out of his butt, like he does all his claims.

twinstead · 12th July 2012, 02:00 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP).

They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006.

Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap.

Yes, but you don't know about the secret Jew Agreement made in 2007 that stipulates the insurance companies will allow Larry to demolish his own buildings and collect the insurance money as a reward for his Jewness.

WAKE UP!

Redwood · 12th July 2012, 02:22 PM

Originally Posted by NoahFence

Bolded part:

I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost.

Those are TIRES.
For a CAR.

And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?

Didn't the insurance companies have a long wrangle with Deutsche Bank? And wasn't there also one with 1 Meridian Plaza in Philly?

Redwood · 12th July 2012, 02:26 PM

I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm?

Bell · 12th July 2012, 02:33 PM

Originally Posted by Redwood

I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm?

They are too busy preparing their evidence to hand over to KSM's lawyers

dc1971 · 15th July 2012, 01:11 PM

Originally Posted by tsig

What you think has no bearing on reality.

Have you ever made an insurance claim? I have and they didn't just write me a check but wanted estimates for the repairs and receipts for all money spent.

It's a pain in the nether regions when you have to file an insurance claim.

Last time I was in an accident, I told the lady who hit me "I'll forget about it if you forget about it." She obliged.

Two reasons I did this - the car was fine just some scuffs which I could remove with hot soap and water and the other reason was I really did not want to deal with the insurance company again. Too much paperwork, too much waiting around for evaluations, estimates and waiting on payments to my mechanic. It sucks!

I could just imagine what Larry Silverstein had to deal with.

DGM · 15th July 2012, 02:10 PM

Originally Posted by dc1971

I could just imagine what Larry Silverstein had to deal with.

For WTC7 it would have been fairly straight forward, He owned the asset.

For the rest of the complex he was just the lease holder. He was never in control of the payments. The insurers obligations are to the owner first. The NY/NJ PA own the properties. Larry Silverstein never controlled the payouts for anything other than WTC7.

This is a very simplie thing to understand that seams to escape the simple minds of the average "truther". Larry Silverstein made no profit on what he did not own.

Simple fact. Larry Silverstein would have made more money if 9/11 never happened.

Anyone wanting to argue against this better be ready with lots of facts (not going to happen).

Bell · 15th July 2012, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

For WTC7 it would have been fairly straight forward, He owned the asset.

Yes, and him "admitting to have pulled WTC7" didn't raise any suspicion with the insurers

DGM · 15th July 2012, 02:25 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

Yes, and him "admitting to have pulled WTC7" didn't raise any suspicion with the insurers

....................so he can break even on a building.

Only a "truther" could suggest something so stupid.

OCaptain · 15th July 2012, 06:07 PM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

Are you freakin' serious?

What do you think the insurance policies were for?

You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late.

I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.

You do know that your personal thoughts on Silverstein's obligations to rebuild or repay the insurance moneys informed noone with regard to NYC insurance regulations?

You'd have loved it if he had made out like a bandit, of course, because that gives you one more reason to hate those Joos!

Robrob · 15th July 2012, 09:13 PM

Originally Posted by OCaptain

You do know that your personal thoughts on Silverstein's obligations to rebuild or repay the insurance moneys informed noone with regard to NYC insurance regulations?

You'd have loved it if he had made out like a bandit, of course, because that gives you one more reason to hate those Joos!

It's the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy at work. Normal people know life is nothing but an undending stream of coincidences and random occurrences. Silverstein survives 9/11 = conspiracy. If Silverstein had died, do you think it would have = no conspiracy or would the CT loons simply found another imaginary scapegoat? Odds are they'd have found a way to imagine his death as intentional.

4th July 2012, 10:20 PM	#1441
brazenlilraisin ...tart Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 548	Because silence is awkward....?
brazenlilraisin ...tart Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 548

5th July 2012, 08:15 AM	#1442
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place? What story?
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

5th July 2012, 09:09 AM	#1443
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,347	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place? Why do you think he was "lucky"? I showed RedIbus he lost money. Do you need to be shown the facts of the day also?
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

5th July 2012, 09:38 AM	#1444
NoahFence Psycho Kitty Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Patriot Nation Posts: 9,329	Only a sick, sick individual would term Larry Silverstein lucky on 9-11. Dude lost friends, and countless money.
	__________________ Our truest life is when we are in our dreams awake. -Henry David Thoreau

5th July 2012, 10:45 AM	#1445
000063 Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Not America. Posts: 4,738	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place? Better question; how could any answer to that question be relevant? I like how you use the name "Lucky Larry" for a guy who actually lost a shedload of money.
	__________________ No, I'd like you to answer the question in two, simple, coherent sentences. ... That's how you present credible arguments in written form. -ergo, on me giving him a 2 digit number I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. - ergo

5th July 2012, 11:02 AM	#1446
plague311 Muse Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Yankees Universe Posts: 894	Originally Posted by 000063 Better question; how could any answer to that question be relevant? I like how you use the name "Lucky Larry" for a guy who actually lost a shedload of money. The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor. He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died. Takes a special person.
	__________________ "What is stopping you from taking action? Did you try CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, etc? Do you have a plan? Are you going to take action? What is your goal? 10 years of failure, no action." - The best question to the "truth" movement, phrased by Beachnut

5th July 2012, 11:14 AM	#1447
The Platypus Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,787	Originally Posted by DGM Why do you think he was "lucky"? Because that's what he's been told to think by his conspiracy cult's crap.
	__________________ I'll go with the qualified experts, over some ranting guy on the internet that claims he has "the truth". Always beware of those that overuse, capitalize and blanket themselves in them word "truth". I may not always know the truth, but i do know when i'm being lied too.

5th July 2012, 02:17 PM	#1448
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Originally Posted by The Platypus Because that's what he's been told to think by his conspiracy cult's crap. Yea. And they call US sheep
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

5th July 2012, 02:19 PM	#1449
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by twinstead Yea. And they call US sheep That's because sheep make you sleep. You need to wake up!
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

5th July 2012, 06:00 PM	#1450
cjnewson88 Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: The van with the big antenna Posts: 1,285	It saddens me this thread is still active
	__________________ Common sense has clearly been snuck up on from behind beaten several times on the head and left to bleed. Over 140 pieces of evidence showing American 77 hit the Pentagon http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/ http://www.youtube.com/user/cjnewson88

6th July 2012, 07:01 PM	#1451
1337m4n Alphanumeric Anonymous Stick Man Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,499	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore So why did Lucky Larry tell the story in the first place? You tell me.
	__________________ http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...2b728514ea.gif "The evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were an inside job just keeps not coming in." --pomeroo

7th July 2012, 01:00 AM	#1452
ozeco41 Illuminator Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia Posts: 3,655	Originally Posted by cjnewson88 It saddens me this thread is still active The base problem is that we of the debunker camp are split into two main camps plus a few minorities. Camp 1 - probably the larger demographic - comprises those who enjoy pointing out the stupidity of truther OR troll claims; Camp 2 - those like me who support the philosophy of "Ignore the Clowns" For Camp 1 the sillier the topic the less effort it takes to pour ridicule on the clowns. And us Camp 2 folk know we are outnumbered and caught in an ironic trap of our own making. Simply put if we post 'Stop feeding the trolls' in a thread we are feeding the trolls.... .....cornered. And no easy way out. ....and, as several members have said, this "pull it" thread must be the most idiotic bit of nonsense....
	Last edited by ozeco41; 7th July 2012 at 01:03 AM.

10th July 2012, 11:14 AM	#1453
grandmastershek Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Where you look at a thigh, and blacken an eye... Posts: 1,324	Originally Posted by plague311 The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor. He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died. Takes a special person. Indeed...you are very special for drawing such conclusions. If Larry died it would be suspicious for whoever the next surviving person in succession was. However, we do know that plenty of high power executives died that day. But yeah...you're right. As we all know insurance companies readily pay out on fraud and murder. It's just good business.
	__________________ For as the NWO are higher than the people, so are their ways higher than your ways, and their thoughts than your thoughts. (A amalgam of Isaiah 55:9 & truther logic)

10th July 2012, 11:34 AM	#1454
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Originally Posted by grandmastershek But yeah...you're right. As we all know insurance companies readily pay out on fraud and murder. It's just good business. LOL
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

11th July 2012, 06:42 PM	#1455
RedIbis Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,829	Originally Posted by plague311 The only reason I can think to call him lucky is that he was supposed to be at the building that morning, but his wife MADE him go see a doctor. He not only lost money but several friends. People he knew for years died. Takes a special person. How do you figure he lost money?
RedIbis Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,829	__________________ (RedIbis, on the other hand, exists to me only in quoted form). - Gravy (Mark Roberts)

11th July 2012, 07:37 PM	#1456
NoahFence Psycho Kitty Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Patriot Nation Posts: 9,329	Originally Posted by RedIbis How do you figure he lost money? Paying leases on buildings that no longer exist. You know this. Don't be stupid.
	__________________ Our truest life is when we are in our dreams awake. -Henry David Thoreau

11th July 2012, 10:08 PM	#1457
Cl1mh4224rd Philosopher Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Pennsylvania, USA Posts: 6,618	Originally Posted by RedIbis How do you figure he lost money? You might want to reread the thread. We've been over this. Perhaps, afterwards, you might consider scheduling an appointment with your physician and tell him or her about your memory troubles.

12th July 2012, 03:40 AM	#1458
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Originally Posted by RedIbis How do you figure he lost money? Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

12th July 2012, 03:50 AM	#1459
Clayton Moore Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 6,195	Originally Posted by twinstead Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed. Are you freakin' serious? What do you think the insurance policies were for? You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late. I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money.
	__________________ Shitat Matzliach is why the Holohoax works. The same neoconservative scum who engineered 9/11 and got the US into two wars want American troops to sacrifice their lives in Syria and Iran. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhc7M...Mc4eb2TClVRQws http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/#aevideo http://www2.ae911truth.org/actionale...rBuilding7.php

12th July 2012, 04:00 AM	#1460
tsig a carbon based life-form Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 26,791	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore Are you freakin' serious? What do you think the insurance policies were for? You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late. I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money. What you think has no bearing on reality. Have you ever made an insurance claim? I have and they didn't just write me a check but wanted estimates for the repairs and receipts for all money spent.

12th July 2012, 04:30 AM	#1461
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore Are you freakin' serious? What do you think the insurance policies were for? You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late. I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money. I would have expected you to counter with evidence that Larry made money, instead of asking a stupid question, making an irrelevant and purposefully loaded statement, and prefacing another statement with the immortal "I don't think" but that's just me. Unless you think insurance companies regularly pay out claims when there's even a hint of fraud, or Larry did any better than break even, or you have ANY compelling evidence whatsoever that the man was somehow in on a plot to kill thousands of people so he could "make out like a bandit", then nobody really cares about what you think.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

12th July 2012, 07:11 AM	#1462
NoahFence Psycho Kitty Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Patriot Nation Posts: 9,329	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore Are you freakin' serious? What do you think the insurance policies were for? You do know that Lucky Larry and his two adult children met for breakfast every day at the tower restaurant. Larry was at the doctors and his children were running late. I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money. Bolded part: I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost. Those are TIRES. For a CAR. And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex?
	__________________ Our truest life is when we are in our dreams awake. -Henry David Thoreau

12th July 2012, 07:27 AM	#1463
16.5 Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,798	Originally Posted by RedIbis How do you figure he lost money? How did you figure he made out like a bandit and received a windfall? Remember like you've claimed and ignored. /It takes some balls for a guy like RI to ask a question about Larry's finances and expect an answer. See my sig.
16.5 Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,798

12th July 2012, 07:36 AM	#1464
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	No one has provided a bit of evidence that Larry made any money that day. Red, you shouldn't act as if any of us has forgotten that fact.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

12th July 2012, 09:31 AM	#1465
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,347	Originally Posted by NoahFence Paying leases on buildings that no longer exist. You know this. Don't be stupid. Originally Posted by Cl1mh4224rd You might want to reread the thread. We've been over this. Perhaps, afterwards, you might consider scheduling an appointment with your physician and tell him or her about your memory troubles. Originally Posted by twinstead Are you freakin' serious? Wash, rinse, repeat indeed. This may be a hard pill to swallow but, RedIbis is right. It is very un-likely that he actually lost money. He would have made money by now if 9/11 never happened. He absolutely did not profit from this.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

12th July 2012, 09:34 AM	#1466
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,347	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money. You have no idea what you are talking about. I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority. Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion". I bet you won't.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

12th July 2012, 12:28 PM	#1467
000063 Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Not America. Posts: 4,738	Originally Posted by NoahFence Bolded part: I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost. Those are TIRES. For a CAR. And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex? But, but, he's a rich Jew! The Jews run the system, remember?
	__________________ No, I'd like you to answer the question in two, simple, coherent sentences. ... That's how you present credible arguments in written form. -ergo, on me giving him a 2 digit number I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. - ergo

12th July 2012, 12:33 PM	#1468
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

12th July 2012, 12:43 PM	#1469
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,347	Originally Posted by twinstead Yup, that must be the reason why the insurance companies aren't paying attention to the handful of truthers who claim that it's obvious Larry committed fraud. It must be some kind of rich Jew honor system. The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP). They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006. Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

12th July 2012, 01:44 PM	#1470
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,347	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore I don't think Lucky Larry had any obligation to rebuild with the insurance money. Originally Posted by DGM You have no idea what you are talking about. I'd bet you don't even know what his agreement is with the Port Authority. Why don't you try to impress us and give a little evidence for your "opinion". I bet you won't. Wow! I'm totally shocked that Clayton Moore can not back up his claim. As we all knew, He pulled this out of his butt, like he does all his claims.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

12th July 2012, 02:00 PM	#1471
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Originally Posted by DGM The reality is, the insurers never did pay out what the "truthers" claim they paid Silverstein Properties (SP). They don't consider the fact that all insurance payouts have to go through the PA and be used to rebuild what was originally insured. This is all spelled out in the SP/PA agreement made in 2006. Anyone saying Larry made out is full of crap. Yes, but you don't know about the secret Jew Agreement made in 2007 that stipulates the insurance companies will allow Larry to demolish his own buildings and collect the insurance money as a reward for his Jewness. WAKE UP!
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

12th July 2012, 02:22 PM	#1472
Redwood Muse Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 555	Insurance Payout Fights Originally Posted by NoahFence Bolded part: I got all 4 tires stolen from my car a few years back. They did NOT pay the total cost to have them replaced. As a matter of fact, I was personally on the hook for over 50% of the cost. Those are TIRES. For a CAR. And you think the insurance company would pay in its entirety, and then some, for the WTC complex? Didn't the insurance companies have a long wrangle with Deutsche Bank? And wasn't there also one with 1 Meridian Plaza in Philly?
Redwood Muse Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 555

12th July 2012, 02:26 PM	#1473
Redwood Muse Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 555	I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm?
Redwood Muse Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 555

12th July 2012, 02:33 PM	#1474
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by Redwood I understand that insurance companies offer handsome rewards to informants in cases of fraudulent claims. Why don't the Truthers try taking their claims to the insurance companies, hmm? They are too busy preparing their evidence to hand over to KSM's lawyers
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

15th July 2012, 01:11 PM	#1475
dc1971 Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 3,033	Originally Posted by tsig What you think has no bearing on reality. Have you ever made an insurance claim? I have and they didn't just write me a check but wanted estimates for the repairs and receipts for all money spent. It's a pain in the nether regions when you have to file an insurance claim. Last time I was in an accident, I told the lady who hit me "I'll forget about it if you forget about it." She obliged. Two reasons I did this - the car was fine just some scuffs which I could remove with hot soap and water and the other reason was I really did not want to deal with the insurance company again. Too much paperwork, too much waiting around for evaluations, estimates and waiting on payments to my mechanic. It sucks! I could just imagine what Larry Silverstein had to deal with.
dc1971 Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 3,033