What piece of Boeing is this?

ref · 11th May 2007, 12:15 AM

This was presented at LC website by Dylan. Out of plain interest, some airline experts out there. What is this? It was supposedly found on top of a cop car at WTC.

Furcifer · 11th May 2007, 12:26 AM

I think i saw this on a website, i believe it was part of an aluminum housing for an overhead light.

qarnos · 11th May 2007, 12:34 AM

I found a very long discussion about it at letsrollforums.com - it's mainly a bunch of troofers deciding what the letters must stand for in order to prove an inside job. There was, however, one post towards the end which seemed to have some useful information. I haven't checked the veracity of it, but the post was made by someone who made the account, made this one post, and hasn't posted since, so I don't think it is a troofer source.

Originally Posted by Beonoid @ letsrollforums

I can't believe I'm wasting time replying to a post this old, BUT...

The part number appears to be 250T1115-2

This would be a valid Boeing part number for a 767 (or 757, as noted below)

The part number is structured using something called WBS, where each part of the number has a meaning. The "2" at the beginning means it is a Systems part. (it would be a "1" for structure, and a "4" for a payloads interiors part).

The "5" specifies a particular subsystem. I think "5" is Electrical subsystems. And the remaining number before the "T is chosen by the major design group to mean whatever they want. The digits after the letter are chosen by subgroups to mean whatever they want.

The "T" by the way stands for 767. "N" is for 757, "W" is for 777, and "A" is for 737 "new generation" airplanes circa 1997. In all cases, "SCD" parts (parts order to spec, as opposed to built to print) have one fewer digit after the letter, and an optional preceding "S": for example, S253T123-2.

Old 737's (pre-1996) and 747's still use the older numbering system: 65B12345 or 69B12345-0.

And just to confuse things more, the 757 and 767 were designed at the same time, and LOTS of the 757 parts have 767 "T" part numbers. This is most noticable in the engines, hydraulics, air conditioning and other "systems" parts. The 757 interior, however, is common to the 737, so you can have some "A" part numbers on 757's and "N" part numbers on 737's.

link to 13th page of the thread. Scroll 2/3 down for the post. The rest of the thread is junk.

Furcifer · 11th May 2007, 12:43 AM

based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing.

qarnos · 11th May 2007, 12:50 AM

Originally Posted by 3bodyproblem

based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing.

I've seen some references to "CSTG" meaning "casting" as in, the part was cast, rather than machined.

No one who claims this has cited a source, so make of it what you will.

Mind you, the "casting" idea is a lot better than this one (from the above thread):

Originally Posted by hdhntr (gee I wonder who that is!)

I was initially struck dumb when I saw this. Then I saw the C but maybe, just maybe, the STG could still stand for Systems Technology Group.

Systems, the word, has been coming up a lot lately in some threads.

This plane was most definitely re-configured by SOME type of Militarily connected program management and systems integration company, or a secret consortium, which would most definitely have had a whole series of directly, or loosely connected ties to the Military, Boeing and the Tanker Consortium, and the Bush Administration's innermost inner circle, including Cheney and Perle.

If legit, I believe that the STG may very well stand for Systems Technology Group, but that is still speculative at this point...

The Great Hairy One · 11th May 2007, 04:10 AM

Originally Posted by qarnos

I've seen some references to "CSTG" meaning "casting" as in, the part was cast, rather than machined.

No one who claims this has cited a source, so make of it what you will.

Mind you, the "casting" idea is a lot better than this one (from the above thread):

Wow, I love how "hdhntr" comes to the conclusion that the plane was reconfigured to some fantasy military getup because some tiny little part may - no confirmation at the time of his post - may have the word "system" in it. By the holy nostrils... Never ceases to amaze me.

Cheers,
TGHO

qarnos · 11th May 2007, 04:21 AM

Originally Posted by The Great Hairy One

Wow, I love how "hdhntr" comes to the conclusion that the plane was reconfigured to some fantasy military getup because some tiny little part may - no confirmation at the time of his post - may have the word "system" in it. By the holy nostrils... Never ceases to amaze me.

Cheers,
TGHO

Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward?

The Great Hairy One · 11th May 2007, 04:51 AM

Originally Posted by qarnos

Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward?

Don't make me beat you, you latte-swilling Melbournian.

Cheers,
TGHO

qarnos · 11th May 2007, 04:59 AM

Originally Posted by The Great Hairy One

Don't make me beat you, you latte-swilling Melbournian.

Cheers,
TGHO

Replace "latte" with "beer" and I'll consider that a compliment

Undesired Walrus · 11th May 2007, 06:03 AM

why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove?

ref · 11th May 2007, 06:12 AM

Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus

why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove?

Originally Posted by Dylanysos

I don't think this really needs much explaining. This either came from one of the planes and we can prove once and for all what hit, or this cop stumbled upon a random scrap of Boeing material that happened to be on top of a car.

I posted this a long time ago on Letsroll, but after recent conversations with ScaffoldRider and Terrorcell, I figured I'd give it another go. In fact, I'm pinning this, because I think this is a reasonable endeavor.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...showtopic=8956

Undesired Walrus · 11th May 2007, 06:20 AM

Quote:

dylan avery Posted: May 10 2007, 05:43 PM

Quote:

(Revolutionary91 @ May 10 2007, 10:38 PM)
Oh of course! Silly me.
-Engine
-Landing Gear
-Tis little bit
-Piece of the fuseloge
-Anything else I have forgotten

All planted by the CIA. :P

You forgot the eyewitnesses.

But..somehow in the case of the pentagon and Flight 93, the above isn't good enough for Dylan?

Undesired Walrus · 11th May 2007, 06:21 AM

Originally Posted by ref

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...showtopic=8956

So Avery is now a non no-planer?

ref · 11th May 2007, 06:24 AM

Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus

So Avery is now a non no-planer?

Yep, he actually created a rule that forbid all discussions about no planes at WTC. He has even suspended Killtown and maybe some others for violating that rule.

I don't know his stand on 77 and 93 though.

defaultdotxbe · 11th May 2007, 06:42 AM

Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus

But..somehow in the case of the pentagon and Flight 93, the above isn't good enough for Dylan?

as far as i can tell dylan think 2 757s and 2 767s were involved in 9/11, he just doesnt think they were the passenger jets they were supposed to be

JimBenArm · 11th May 2007, 08:38 AM

Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus

why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove?

That he's the biggest moron on the face of the planet. It's working, too...

apathoid · 13th May 2007, 05:17 AM

Originally Posted by ref

This was presented at LC website by Dylan. Out of plain interest, some airline experts out there. What is this? It was supposedly found on top of a cop car at WTC.

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...4173941139.png

In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref?

qarnos · 13th May 2007, 05:29 AM

Originally Posted by apathoid

In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref?

I'd like to see it, if you can do it.

cloudshipsrule · 13th May 2007, 07:55 AM

Quote:

based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing.

Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees.

gumboot · 13th May 2007, 11:34 AM

Originally Posted by cloudshipsrule

Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees.

One obscure Boeing 767 part - $900
One bucket of dust - $15
One digital camera - $400
Fooling people into thinking a 767 hit the WTC - Priceless

-Gumboot

HeyLeroy · 13th May 2007, 12:23 PM

Quote:

This plane was most definitely re-configured by SOME type of Militarily connected program management and systems integration company, or a secret consortium, which would most definitely have had a whole series of directly, or loosely connected ties to the Military, Boeing and the Tanker Consortium, and the Bush Administration's innermost inner circle, including Cheney and Perle.

Yup, 'cause secret military consortiums would have shelf-loads of nefarious bits, all with serial numbers.

MikeW · 13th May 2007, 12:40 PM

Originally Posted by apathoid

In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref?

Interested? You bet! Anything you can find would be great.

Furcifer · 13th May 2007, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by cloudshipsrule

Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees.

well duh! that goes without saying around here

PhantomWolf · 13th May 2007, 06:29 PM

Quote:

There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s

Heh, and there was my first impression from looking at the image... Why are they looking for a 250T1115-2? It says 256T1115-2

ref · 13th May 2007, 11:16 PM

Originally Posted by apathoid

In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref?

Thanks Apathoid, of course I am interested and others seem to be as well

tacodaemon · 13th May 2007, 11:37 PM

Originally Posted by qarnos

Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward?

Later in that wacky thread, hdhntr decides STG actually stands for "stage", which proves it's from a harpoon missile (because some document on Boeing's Web site about said missile uses "stg" as an abbreviation for "stage"). But someone else points out that the TT on the next line down obviously means "Tanker Transport", which proves a fuel tanker plane was used rather than a passenger plane.

There isn't a

big enough for these people.

gumboot · 13th May 2007, 11:56 PM

I'm actually pretty sure STG stands for Stupid Truther Guppies.

See how easy it is?

-Gumboot

hellaeon · 14th May 2007, 12:03 AM

Hey im confused. What happened to the Blueprints smoking gun, and then the other Emergency worker that blue the lid on wtc 7 demolition?

I thought he would have gone to the authorities with his hinted evidence of a cover up?

This is like a snake oil salesman.

qarnos · 14th May 2007, 12:08 AM

Originally Posted by hellaeon

Hey im confused. What happened to the Blueprints smoking gun, and then the other Emergency worker that blue the lid on wtc 7 demolition?

I thought he would have gone to the authorities with his hinted evidence of a cover up?

This is like a snake oil salesman.

I think it's more like a religion. They must keep the faith that it was an inside job.

apathoid · 14th May 2007, 06:26 AM

Well, I didn't get a chance to actually find the mystery part as installed and photograph it because there wasn't a 767 with the forward bag bin ceiling opened up(there usually is) and I was pretty busy all night(installing landing gear wiring harnesses.....fun!). But I did print out the relevant IPC figure as well as the item text page. I also pulled a page out of my 767 school training manual that shows where the part is located(sort of) on the airplane.

This last image isn't exactly accurate as to the location, the slat aft quadrant is actually much farther down, closer to the wing root than where it's depicted below.

uk_dave · 14th May 2007, 06:31 AM

Crikey! And we trust our lives to a couple of wheels and a length of string

ref · 14th May 2007, 06:33 AM

Thank Apathoid!

That was quite satifying

Mystery solved. Dylan will hear of this sooner or later too, I think.

apathoid · 14th May 2007, 06:41 AM

Originally Posted by uk_dave

Crikey! And we trust our lives to a couple of wheels and a length of string

Pretty much.

apathoid · 14th May 2007, 06:49 AM

Originally Posted by ref

Thank Apathoid!

That was quite satifying

Mystery solved. Dylan will hear of this sooner or later too, I think.

Anytime.

LashL · 14th May 2007, 08:11 AM

Nice work, apathoid.

qarnos · 14th May 2007, 02:19 PM

Good stuff, apathoid. The truthers have been working on this one for at least 3 years.

It's funny how if you actually look for answers, you can find them.

gumboot · 14th May 2007, 02:41 PM

The truth is so boring sometimes...

-Gumboot

Furcifer · 14th May 2007, 03:41 PM

Originally Posted by gumboot

The truth is so boring sometimes...

-Gumboot

Amazon.com:
"Boeing Parts Cross Reference Guide" (Softcover)
by Black-Ops publishing
Selected Chapters: 17-"Slat Actuators" 23-"Pods"
List Price: $23.95
Check for Used here
Check out what readers are saying: Be the first (and last) to write a review of this book here
Usually ships: hand delivered right to your door
Customers who bought this item also bought
"An Introductory Guide to Death Ray Guns"
"Home Holography"
"The Complete Idiots Guide to Conspiracy"
"Covering Your Tracks, What Everyone Needs to Know" (discontinued 1999)

WildCat · 14th May 2007, 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by apathoid

But I did print out the relevant IPC figure as well as the item text page.

OMG, it's part of the remote control system!!!!1111Conspiracy1!!1!!!!1

WildCat · 14th May 2007, 05:53 PM

I love how Dylan "investigates" this part:

Originally Posted by Dylan Avery

I got a free DVD request back on 9/26/2006 from someone whose father used to work for Raytheon and Boeing...

I just dropped him an e-mail to touch base. We'll see...

11th May 2007, 12:15 AM	#1
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	What piece of Boeing is this? This was presented at LC website by Dylan. Out of plain interest, some airline experts out there. What is this? It was supposedly found on top of a cop car at WTC.
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	__________________ 9/11 Guide homepage Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit. - Chief Daniel Nigro

11th May 2007, 12:34 AM	#3
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	I found a very long discussion about it at letsrollforums.com - it's mainly a bunch of troofers deciding what the letters must stand for in order to prove an inside job. There was, however, one post towards the end which seemed to have some useful information. I haven't checked the veracity of it, but the post was made by someone who made the account, made this one post, and hasn't posted since, so I don't think it is a troofer source. Originally Posted by Beonoid @ letsrollforums I can't believe I'm wasting time replying to a post this old, BUT... The part number appears to be 250T1115-2 This would be a valid Boeing part number for a 767 (or 757, as noted below) The part number is structured using something called WBS, where each part of the number has a meaning. The "2" at the beginning means it is a Systems part. (it would be a "1" for structure, and a "4" for a payloads interiors part). The "5" specifies a particular subsystem. I think "5" is Electrical subsystems. And the remaining number before the "T is chosen by the major design group to mean whatever they want. The digits after the letter are chosen by subgroups to mean whatever they want. The "T" by the way stands for 767. "N" is for 757, "W" is for 777, and "A" is for 737 "new generation" airplanes circa 1997. In all cases, "SCD" parts (parts order to spec, as opposed to built to print) have one fewer digit after the letter, and an optional preceding "S": for example, S253T123-2. Old 737's (pre-1996) and 747's still use the older numbering system: 65B12345 or 69B12345-0. And just to confuse things more, the 757 and 767 were designed at the same time, and LOTS of the 757 parts have 767 "T" part numbers. This is most noticable in the engines, hydraulics, air conditioning and other "systems" parts. The 757 interior, however, is common to the 737, so you can have some "A" part numbers on 757's and "N" part numbers on 737's. link to 13th page of the thread. Scroll 2/3 down for the post. The rest of the thread is junk.
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

11th May 2007, 12:50 AM	#5
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	Originally Posted by 3bodyproblem based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing. I've seen some references to "CSTG" meaning "casting" as in, the part was cast, rather than machined. No one who claims this has cited a source, so make of it what you will. Mind you, the "casting" idea is a lot better than this one (from the above thread): Originally Posted by hdhntr (gee I wonder who that is!) I was initially struck dumb when I saw this. Then I saw the C but maybe, just maybe, the STG could still stand for Systems Technology Group. Systems, the word, has been coming up a lot lately in some threads. This plane was most definitely re-configured by SOME type of Militarily connected program management and systems integration company, or a secret consortium, which would most definitely have had a whole series of directly, or loosely connected ties to the Military, Boeing and the Tanker Consortium, and the Bush Administration's innermost inner circle, including Cheney and Perle. If legit, I believe that the STG may very well stand for Systems Technology Group, but that is still speculative at this point...
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

11th May 2007, 04:10 AM	#6
The Great Hairy One Chief Cdr Scientist, NWO Cloning Labs Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,066	Originally Posted by qarnos I've seen some references to "CSTG" meaning "casting" as in, the part was cast, rather than machined. No one who claims this has cited a source, so make of it what you will. Mind you, the "casting" idea is a lot better than this one (from the above thread): Wow, I love how "hdhntr" comes to the conclusion that the plane was reconfigured to some fantasy military getup because some tiny little part may - no confirmation at the time of his post - may have the word "system" in it. By the holy nostrils... Never ceases to amaze me. Cheers, TGHO
	__________________ High Priest of Gzortch, the Demon Prince of Nostrils

11th May 2007, 04:21 AM	#7
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	Originally Posted by The Great Hairy One Wow, I love how "hdhntr" comes to the conclusion that the plane was reconfigured to some fantasy military getup because some tiny little part may - no confirmation at the time of his post - may have the word "system" in it. By the holy nostrils... Never ceases to amaze me. Cheers, TGHO Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward?
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

11th May 2007, 12:26 AM	#2
Furcifer miscreant Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: hohm Posts: 13,149	I think i saw this on a website, i believe it was part of an aluminum housing for an overhead light.

11th May 2007, 12:43 AM	#4
Furcifer miscreant Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: hohm Posts: 13,149	based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing.

11th May 2007, 04:51 AM	#8
The Great Hairy One Chief Cdr Scientist, NWO Cloning Labs Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,066	Originally Posted by qarnos Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward? Don't make me beat you, you latte-swilling Melbournian. Cheers, TGHO
	__________________ High Priest of Gzortch, the Demon Prince of Nostrils

11th May 2007, 04:59 AM	#9
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	Originally Posted by The Great Hairy One Don't make me beat you, you latte-swilling Melbournian. Cheers, TGHO Replace "latte" with "beer" and I'll consider that a compliment
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

11th May 2007, 06:03 AM	#10
Undesired Walrus Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: London Posts: 10,666	why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove?

11th May 2007, 06:12 AM	#11
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove? Originally Posted by Dylanysos I don't think this really needs much explaining. This either came from one of the planes and we can prove once and for all what hit, or this cop stumbled upon a random scrap of Boeing material that happened to be on top of a car. I posted this a long time ago on Letsroll, but after recent conversations with ScaffoldRider and Terrorcell, I figured I'd give it another go. In fact, I'm pinning this, because I think this is a reasonable endeavor. http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...showtopic=8956
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	__________________ 9/11 Guide homepage Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit. - Chief Daniel Nigro

11th May 2007, 06:20 AM	#12
Undesired Walrus Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: London Posts: 10,666	Quote: dylan avery Posted: May 10 2007, 05:43 PM Quote: (Revolutionary91 @ May 10 2007, 10:38 PM) Oh of course! Silly me. -Engine -Landing Gear -Tis little bit -Piece of the fuseloge -Anything else I have forgotten All planted by the CIA. :P You forgot the eyewitnesses. But..somehow in the case of the pentagon and Flight 93, the above isn't good enough for Dylan?

11th May 2007, 06:21 AM	#13
Undesired Walrus Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: London Posts: 10,666	Originally Posted by ref http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...showtopic=8956 So Avery is now a non no-planer?

11th May 2007, 06:24 AM	#14
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus So Avery is now a non no-planer? Yep, he actually created a rule that forbid all discussions about no planes at WTC. He has even suspended Killtown and maybe some others for violating that rule. I don't know his stand on 77 and 93 though.
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	__________________ 9/11 Guide homepage Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit. - Chief Daniel Nigro

11th May 2007, 06:42 AM	#15
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Dark Side of the Sun Posts: 7,482	Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus But..somehow in the case of the pentagon and Flight 93, the above isn't good enough for Dylan? as far as i can tell dylan think 2 757s and 2 767s were involved in 9/11, he just doesnt think they were the passenger jets they were supposed to be
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

11th May 2007, 08:38 AM	#16
JimBenArm Sir Barbarella of Corndogia Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Kansas City, MO Posts: 12,240	Originally Posted by Undesired Walrus why is dylan posting this? What's he trying to prove? That he's the biggest moron on the face of the planet. It's working, too...
	__________________ *"JimBenArm is right"* Hokulele Mom

13th May 2007, 05:17 AM	#17
apathoid Government Loyalist Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Virgo Supercluster Posts: 2,691	Originally Posted by ref This was presented at LC website by Dylan. Out of plain interest, some airline experts out there. What is this? It was supposedly found on top of a cop car at WTC. http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...4173941139.png In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref?
	__________________ Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken

13th May 2007, 05:29 AM	#18
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	Originally Posted by apathoid In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref? I'd like to see it, if you can do it.
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

13th May 2007, 07:55 AM	#19
cloudshipsrule Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,171	Quote: based on that post and the STG, safeTglo, a lighting supplier to boeing, i'm willing to bet it is actually part of a overhead light housing. Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees.

13th May 2007, 11:34 AM	#20
gumboot lorcutus.tolere Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: New Zealand Posts: 21,985	Originally Posted by cloudshipsrule Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees. One obscure Boeing 767 part - $900 One bucket of dust - $15 One digital camera - $400 Fooling people into thinking a 767 hit the WTC - Priceless -Gumboot
	__________________ O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi. A fan of fantasy? Check out Project Dreamforge.

13th May 2007, 12:23 PM	#21
HeyLeroy Vegan Cannibal Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Going off the rails on the Crazy Train. Posts: 5,553	Quote: This plane was most definitely re-configured by SOME type of Militarily connected program management and systems integration company, or a secret consortium, which would most definitely have had a whole series of directly, or loosely connected ties to the Military, Boeing and the Tanker Consortium, and the Bush Administration's innermost inner circle, including Cheney and Perle. Yup, 'cause secret military consortiums would have shelf-loads of nefarious bits, all with serial numbers.
	__________________ Cows are in large numbers, and do not serve any other purpose, other than to eat grass, and moo -- makaya325 I ♥ my kids. I ♠ my dog. I ♣ my baby Harp Seal.

13th May 2007, 12:40 PM	#22
MikeW Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,898	Originally Posted by apathoid In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref? Interested? You bet! Anything you can find would be great.
MikeW Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,898

13th May 2007, 03:10 PM	#23
Furcifer miscreant Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: hohm Posts: 13,149	Originally Posted by cloudshipsrule Or just a really good copy planted by the NWO worker bees. well duh! that goes without saying around here

13th May 2007, 06:29 PM	#24
PhantomWolf Philosopher Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base Posts: 8,195	Quote: There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s Heh, and there was my first impression from looking at the image... Why are they looking for a 250T1115-2? It says 256T1115-2
	__________________ It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My Apollo Page. 1 on 1 Debating Forum for Skeptics and sceptics.

13th May 2007, 11:16 PM	#25
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	Originally Posted by apathoid In addition to Beonoid's information which sounds pretty good to me - I did a part number search in the 767 Illustrated Parts Catalog. There is no 250T1115, but there is a 256T1115 installed on our 767s and it's a bracket which is part of a leading edge slat actuator assembly. The illustration of this part seems to be a pretty good match for the picture of mystery part in the OP. I can(maybe) get a picture of one at work tomorrow, or print out the IPC illustration and scan it, if anyone is still interested..Ref? Thanks Apathoid, of course I am interested and others seem to be as well
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	__________________ 9/11 Guide homepage Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit. - Chief Daniel Nigro

13th May 2007, 11:37 PM	#26
tacodaemon Muse Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: DC Posts: 571	Originally Posted by qarnos Well, it didn't have the word "System" in it - it had the letter "S". Obviously, "S" means System, which means 9/11 was an inside job. What could be more straight-forward? Later in that wacky thread, hdhntr decides STG actually stands for "stage", which proves it's from a harpoon missile (because some document on Boeing's Web site about said missile uses "stg" as an abbreviation for "stage"). But someone else points out that the TT on the next line down obviously means "Tanker Transport", which proves a fuel tanker plane was used rather than a passenger plane. There isn't a big enough for these people.
	__________________ "Killtown, your brain is like the four headed, man-eating haddock fish beast of Aberdeen." - Fr Ted @ LCF

13th May 2007, 11:56 PM	#27
gumboot lorcutus.tolere Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: New Zealand Posts: 21,985	I'm actually pretty sure STG stands for Stupid Truther Guppies. See how easy it is? -Gumboot
	__________________ O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi. A fan of fantasy? Check out Project Dreamforge.

14th May 2007, 12:03 AM	#28
hellaeon Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: City of Burning Churches, Australia Posts: 1,493	Hey im confused. What happened to the Blueprints smoking gun, and then the other Emergency worker that blue the lid on wtc 7 demolition? I thought he would have gone to the authorities with his hinted evidence of a cover up? This is like a snake oil salesman.
	__________________ Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. - Carl Sagan I don't exactly have a Phd in physics. I have something much better. Common sense. - pagan How does one change their mind without losing face after staunchly supporting a single point of view for years? It's quite alright, you are expected to maintain your opinion even if those responsible for 9/11 confess to their crimes. - Irony, MirageMemories style

14th May 2007, 12:08 AM	#29
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,982	Originally Posted by hellaeon Hey im confused. What happened to the Blueprints smoking gun, and then the other Emergency worker that blue the lid on wtc 7 demolition? I thought he would have gone to the authorities with his hinted evidence of a cover up? This is like a snake oil salesman. I think it's more like a religion. They must keep the faith that it was an inside job.
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

14th May 2007, 06:26 AM	#30
apathoid Government Loyalist Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Virgo Supercluster Posts: 2,691	Well, I didn't get a chance to actually find the mystery part as installed and photograph it because there wasn't a 767 with the forward bag bin ceiling opened up(there usually is) and I was pretty busy all night(installing landing gear wiring harnesses.....fun!). But I did print out the relevant IPC figure as well as the item text page. I also pulled a page out of my 767 school training manual that shows where the part is located(sort of) on the airplane. This last image isn't exactly accurate as to the location, the slat aft quadrant is actually much farther down, closer to the wing root than where it's depicted below.
	__________________ Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken Last edited by apathoid; 14th May 2007 at 08:19 AM. Reason: above=below

14th May 2007, 06:31 AM	#31
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,397	Crikey! And we trust our lives to a couple of wheels and a length of string
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,397

14th May 2007, 06:33 AM	#32
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	Thank Apathoid! That was quite satifying Mystery solved. Dylan will hear of this sooner or later too, I think.
ref Master Poster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,645	__________________ 9/11 Guide homepage Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit. - Chief Daniel Nigro

14th May 2007, 06:41 AM	#33
apathoid Government Loyalist Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Virgo Supercluster Posts: 2,691	Originally Posted by uk_dave Crikey! And we trust our lives to a couple of wheels and a length of string Pretty much.
	__________________ Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken

14th May 2007, 06:49 AM	#34
apathoid Government Loyalist Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Virgo Supercluster Posts: 2,691	Originally Posted by ref Thank Apathoid! That was quite satifying Mystery solved. Dylan will hear of this sooner or later too, I think. Anytime.
	__________________ Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken

14th May 2007, 08:11 AM	#35
LashL Goddess of Legaltainment™ Administrator Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: NWO AGM Posts: 20,459	Nice work, apathoid.